Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 10/10/2017 - P3
Board of Aldermen — 10/09/17 Page 3
MOTION BY ALDERMAN MORIARTY TO ACCEPT AND PLACE ON FILE
MOTION CARRIED
Alderman Moriarty
| was hoping to speak on that. When would be the appropriate time to do that?
President McCarthy
The communication has been accepted by the Board. If you wish to speak, probably under Remarks by
Members of the Board at the end would be appropriate. Did you raise your hand when | asked for
discussion?
Alderman Moriarty
| did, yes. | apologize if it wasn’t high.
President McCarthy
I’ll allow some discussion, but not an entire reading of it because we did vote to read communications by
title only.
Alderman Moriarty
I'll be quick. The more | thought about this, I’m inclined to do nothing and let the voters of Nashua make
up their minds on their own without the interference with the Board of Aldermen. | did find that what we
have is two laws that seem to be inconsistent with each other. We have a state law and we have a city
law. The state law says that city staff are not supposed to do anything ever to effect a ballot question.
Then we have a city law that says that the city staff is supposed to provide pro and con information about
a ballot question. The state law, RSA 659:44-a says that no public employee while in performance of their
duties shall electioneer and such a thing is a misdemeanor. | personally don’t want to encourage any city
staff, Director Cummings or the City Clerk, to do anything that might be in violation of the electioneering
statute, to put them at risk at a misdemeanor.
Meanwhile, we do have a city law that says whenever a measure is submitted to vote by the qualified
voters of the City of Nashua that the city charter and corporation counsel shall prepare pro and con
arguments for this, assuming that that submission is pursuant to Sections 98 through 108 of the city
charter. | went back and read the motion when that was made to put the Performing Arts Center on the
ballot as question, and there is no mention of what section of the Charter was used. | have a question to
Alderman Clemons since he made the motion. I’m not picking on you, but you made the motion. So | will
ask you the question: When you made the motion to create the ballot question, what Charter section were
you using to give the Board of Aldermen the authority to put that question on the ballot?
President McCarthy
I’m going to pose that question to Corporation Counsel, who would be in a better position to know what
our rights are to put questions on the ballot.
Attorney Bolton
| don’t pretend to know what Alderman Clemons was thinking in his own mind as to whether any particular
authorizing legislation was impacted. | would say that if a measure was going to be referred to the voters
pursuant to the Charter provisions, really 102, but 98 all the way through 108, the proper way to do that
would have been to amend the introductory language as the charter provides to say: “Be it resolved by the
