Search

1. CertainTeed WinterGuard Sand
2. CertainTeed WinterGuard HT
3. CertainTeed WinterGuard Granular

2.4

2.5

2.6

PART 3
3.1

3.2

FLASHING MATERIALS

A. Sheet Flashing: ASTM A 361/A361M; 26 Gauge (0.45 mm) steel with
minimum G115/Z350 galvanized coating

B. Sheet Flashing: ASTM B 209; 0.025 (0.63mm) thick aluminum, mill
finish.

C. Sheet Flashing: ASTM B 370; cold rolled copper; 16 ounces per square
foot (0.55mm), natural finish.

D. Bitumious Paint: Acid and alkali resistant type; black color.

E. Tinner’s Paint: Color as selected by Architect to coordinate with shingle
color.

ACCESSORIES

A. Nails: Standard round wire type roofing nails, corrosion resistant; hot
dipped zinc coated steel, aluminum or chormated steel; minimum 3.8
inch (9.5mm) head diameter; minimum 11 or 12 gage (2.5mm) shank
diameter; shank to be sufficient length to penetrate through the roof
sheathing or % inch (19mm) into solid wood, plywood or non-veneer
wood decking.

B. Asphalt Roofing Cement: ASTM D 4586, Type | or II

FLASHING FABRICATION

A. Form flashing to profiles indicated on Drawings and to protect roofing
materials from physical damage and shed water.

B. Form sections square and accurate to profile, in maximum possible
lengths, free from distortion or defects detrimental to appearance or
performance.

EXECUTION

EXAMINATION

A. Verify existing site conditions under provisions of Section 01 70 00.

B. Verify that roof penetrations and plumbing stacks are in place and
flashed to deck surfaces.

C. Verify deck surfaces are dry and free of ridges, warps or voids.

ROOF DECK PREPARATION

073113-6

A. Follow shingle manufacturer's recommendations for acceptable roof
deck material

B. Broom clean deck surfaces under eave protection and underlayment
prior to their application

3.3. INSTALLATION — EAVE ICE DAM PROTECTION

A. Place eave edge and gable metal edge flashing tight with fascia boards.
Weather-lap joints 2 inches (50mm). Secure flange with nails spaced 8 inches (200
mm) on center.

B. Apply CertainTeed “WinterGuard” Waterproofing Shingle Underlayment as
eave protection in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions.
**NOTE** Change dimensions below to 48 inches (1220 mm) or greater for low slope roofs or
severe climatic conditions.
C. Extend eave protection membrane minimum 24 inches (640 mm) up slope
beyond interior face of exterior wall.

3.4. INSTALLATION — PROTECTIVE UNDERLAYMENT
**NOTE* Delete first three paragraphs below if all roof slopes are greater than 4:12 Otherwise,
select either complete WinterGuard underlayment, Roofers Select, Diamond Deck or D4869
underlayment in combination with eave ice damn protection.

A. Roof Slopes between 2:12 and 4:12: Apply one layer of “WinterGuard” over
all areas not protected by WinterGuard at eaves, with end and edges weather
lapped minimum of 19 inches (480 mm) Stagger end laps each consecutive
layer. Nail in place

B. Roof Slopes between 2:12 and 4:12: Apply two layers of Roofer’s Select or
D4869 underlayment over areas not protected my WinterGuard at eaves, with
ends and edges weather-lapped 19 inches (480 mm) .Stagger end laps each
consecutive layer. Nail in place.

C. Roof Slopes between 2:12 and 4:12 — Use of Diamond Deck Synthetic
Roofing Underlayment. Follow manufacturer's printed instructions for low
slope application of this product. Do not use staples on this product.

D. Roof Slopes 4:12 or Greater: Install one layer of asphalt felt shingle
underlayment perpendicular to slope of roof and lap minimum 4 inches (100
mm) over eave protection.

E. Weather-lap and seal watertight with asphalt roofing cement items projecting
through or mounted on roof. Avoid contact or solvent-based cements with
WinterGuard and Diamond Deck

3.5. INSTALLATION — VALLEY PROTECTION

A. For “closed-cut,” “woven,” and “open” valleys, first place one ply of
WinterGuard, minimum 36 inches (910 mm) wide, centered over valleys. Lap
joints minimum of 6 inches (152 mm) Follow instructions of shingle an
waterproofing membrane manufacturer.

3.6 INSTALLATON — METAL FLASHING

A. Weather-lap joints minimum 2 inches (50 mm).

073113-7

3.7

3.8

3.9

B. Seal work projecting through or mounted on roof with asphalt roofing cement
and make weather tight.

INSTALLATION- ASPHALT SHINGLES

A. Install shingles in accordance with manufacturer’s instructions for product
type and application specified.

FIELD QUALITY CONTROL
A. Field inspection will be performed under provisions of Section 01 40 00.

B. Visual inspection of the work will be provided by Owner. If conditions are
unacceptable, Owner will notify the Architect.

PROTECTION OF FINISHED WORK
A. Protect finished work under provisions of Section 01 70 00.

B. Do not permit traffic over finished roof surface.

END OF SECTION

073113-8

Legend
? 14 Court St

! | A
eT Py 4 if, | é i |
i ae a |
| ee hoe
| | H hh | .
5 men | | i henge S ~
> - f == | | } the | / } /
° Boos pas | | | |
a ftaeese
'

CL JEPDM Area

EBEPDM Wall Coverage 1375.7 SQFT[_] wre
.) Shingle Roof 5420.9 SQFT|_|

Reeth
ee

aa a = “, t . = .) Tower Roof Shingles 421.1 SQFT[_| ad
att he a & —. Ari}

.= oe . "ee Gas (“1 Parapet Cap 726.9 FT my
a a a [=1 Wall Tie In's 181.9 FT al |
S35 Se, 5 Se Tp
sana Te a ~

i . Pe,
See a f a — 7
a fi ) \ es Fi ——_ a N

sane ieee | ; ie na =e
Google.Earth mi! ir ~ Pi rae iielehi |

=

Mobile Outreach Services

o LEAD TESTING AT142
2 : 2 ITs WHAT WE DG!

CF:

emt ease

=

}

i
“i | ji ) &

Board of Aldermen — 11/28/17 Page 10
President McCarthy

| don’t know that we can answer.

Alderman Schoneman

Perhaps it’s not imminent. My concern, listening to Mr. Broderick, is that it sounds like other members of their
board would like to be able to weigh in on it. And if Mr. Fredette’s term is not about to expire, | don’t know if

there’s any harm in getting those folks involved with the Finance committee folks just to figure out their overall
plan, so that everyone is moving forward in sync. Would that be possible?

President McCarthy

Are you moving to re-refer this to the committee?

MOTION BY ALDERMAN SCHONEMAN TO RE-REFER R-17-143 TO THE FINANCE COMMITTEE

ON THE QUESTION:

Alderman Clemons

On the Motion to Re-Refer, | would say that it’s sort of an unnecessary step. The reason that | feel that way is
because as Corporation Counsel has pointed out, the other side is going to have to agree to this lease deal
regardless. My feeling is that we ought to send it to them, and if they don’t agree with it, they won't sign it. And
they'll come back with another suggestion. But let’s get the conversation going rather than putting this back
into the committee, and probably what would end up happening is having this go dead until the next Board of
Aldermen comes in.

Alderman Dowd

| was just going to ask for a little clarification from Finance but | think we just got that.

Alderman Wilshire

| agree with Alderman Clemons. Their board came to us to ask for this change. If they don’t agree with the
change we made when we send it back to them, they don’t sign it and they send it back to us. | think that’s the
appropriate move at this point.

Alderman Cookson

We have another piece of legislation coming before us this evening with regard to Absolute Broadcasting. Is
that correct?

President McCarthy

| think so.

Alderman Cookson

Has that already been passed this evening?
Alderman Dowd

That’s one that we already took care of.

City of Nashua

Purchasing Department
Administrative Services Division

229 Main Street - Nashua, NH 03060

May 26, 2021
Memo #21-134

TO: Mayor Donchess
Finance Committee

SUBJECT: 3 Vehicles for Nashua City Schools in the amount of $106,970 funded from accounts CERF/81500
Vehciles

Please see attached communications from Shawn Smith, Plant Operations Director, dated May 26, 2021 for project
specific details related to this purchase. Below please find a summary of the purchase approval request:

Item:

Value:
Vendor:
Department:
Source Fund:

Ordinance:

3 Vehicles: 1-Ford 2021 Escape, 1-Ford 2022 E250 Box Van and 1-Ford 350 Transit Van

$106,970

Grappone Ford of Bow NH
191 School Department

CERF/81500 Vehciles

Pursuant to § 5-78 Major purchases (greater than $10,000) A. All supplies and contractual
services, except as otherwise provided herein, when the estimated cost thereof shall
exceed $10,000 shall be purchased by formal, written contract from the lowest responsible
bidder, after due notice inviting bids.

Quotes from multiple local Ford dealers were solicited and the following quotes were received:

Vendor Location Amount Note

Grappone Ford Bow, NH $106,970

Londonderry Ford Londonderry, NH $73,066* | No bid was offered for the Transit Van
Best Ford Nashua, NH None No bid was offered for these vehicles

We recommend this purchase to be awarded to the lowest total cost vendor who meets the specified requirements.

The Board of Education (5/26/21 BOE meeting), Nashua School District, and the Purchasing Department
respectfully request your approval of this contract.

Regards,

Kelly Parkinson

Purchasing Manager

Ce: S Smith
J Graziano

(603) 589-3330
Fax (603) 594-3233

NASHUA
SCHOOL DISTRICT

aati ah nmi a

Gateway to Opportunity
38 Riverside Street
Nashua, NH 03060 Shawn Smith
603-966-1500, Fax: 603-594-4361 Director, Plant Operations

May 26, 2021
To: Finance Committee
Fm: Shawn M. Smith, Plant Operations Director

Subj: Recommended Capital Equipment Reserve Fund (CERF) Purchases for School Department

The FY21 planned CERF replacements include our 2004 Ford Taurus, 2006 Ford Box Van and a 2007
Chevrolet Cargo Van. Additional information on these vehicles follows:

e Ford Taurus — Used by Plant Operations Supervisor. It has accumulated 51,417 miles. That
isn’t a lot of mileage, but it is all city driving, which is hard on an engine. Well beyond
expected service life. Experiencing a fair amount of rust in undercarriage.

* Ford Box Van —- This van is used by the Food Services staff. It has accumulated 103,436 miles.
Looming repairs necessary if kept on the road, and beyond its expected service life.

* Chevrolet Cargo Van — This van is used by one of our Master Electricians. It has accumulated
84,856 miles. It is beyond its expected service life. Experiencing a fair amount of rust in
undercarriage.

The way we have utilized this program is to “retire” the vehicles being replaced, but hold onto them
as spares and for use by summer grounds personnel. Thus we will actually be trading in vehicles
replaced last fiscal year, specifically a 2003 E350 Cargo Van with 76,815 miles and a 2003 Ford Box Van
with 59,182 miles. In addition to their age and mileage, both vehicles are experiencing a significant
amount of rusting in structural members and would not qualify for a registration sticker. | therefore
doubt much will be realized in trade-in value.

To replace the three vehicles above we originally chose to purchase a Ford Explorer, Ford E250 Box
Van and Ford 350 Transit Van, and solicited bids from three local Ford Dealers (our fleet is 95% Ford),
Best Ford of Nashua, Londonderry Ford and Grappone Ford of Concord. Best Ford chose not to bid on
any of the three vehicles. The bids received are as follows:

Graponne Ford Londonderry Ford.
2021 Ford Explorer $30,110 §30,290
2022 Ford E250 Box $46,424 $46,691
2021 Ford 350 Transit $36.655 No Bid

Subsequent to this process the Board of Education’s finance & operations committee chose not to
approve the Ford Explorer and asked me to look into a vehicle of lessor capability with better gas
mileage. | reached out to the above two vendors who bid and asked them to price a 2021 Ford
Escape. The bids were as follows: