Search

Item No.

632.3118

632.32

632.80

1010.9

DUNN ive Ravi na Cor porativ

City of Nashua, New Hampshire
Division of Public Works
IFB0660-020922
2022 Paving Program

Estimated

Total Price
in figures

$ at So.00

s/ BFS, 60

125,000.00

Item Description Unit Brice
" : p os
Quantity Units in figures
500 LF Retroreflective Thermoplastic Pavement Markings, 18" Line
Ewe. Dollars and ee
Ril a SS CHES $ S © Oo O
250 SF Retroreflective Thermoplastic Symbol
anal @ vy Dollars and an re
Erte ‘ ——= cents $ ‘| > 6)
250 EA Temporary Pavement Markers
No ee _Dollars and sy inlay
Se weave; Exive cents $s | S
400 cy Loam and Seed
F¥line ku t OOY ————--——— Dollars and
Ko 1 __— > cents
1 Allowance Liquid Asphalt Adjustment
One Hundred Twenty-Five Thousand Dollars and
00/100 cents $ 125,000.00 $
85 EA Asphalt Core
if i re Dollars and

POO— : cents

BASE BID SUB-TOTAL $

50.00 : 4 250, CO

SOV-3 of 4

City of Nashua, New Hampshire
Division of Public Works
IFB0660-020922
2022 Paving Program

Estimated Item Description Unit Price Total Price
Item No. Quantity Units a in figures in figures
ADDITIVE ALTERNATE BID ITEM (IF AWARDED BY OWNER)
ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO.1

608.12 450 sy 2" Bituminous Sidewalk

zNrce ars LOO s YFD.DO
608.24 420 SY 4" Reinforced Cement Concrete Sidewalk

et 00s Yan
608.36 370 SY 6" Reinforced Cement Concrete Sidewalk

No = "ass LOO ss 340,00
608.54 100 SY Detectable Warning Device

“Thece OVSE nel | Forty lwo— Pellareand . 2 pYa.o0 . 2 6 y | 2 00. dd

609.5 950 LF Reset Granite Curbing

i =e sl0O 5450.00

ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO. 1 SUB-TOTAL $

TOTAL BID

BASE BID $

FAT, 4/2. SO

ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO.1 $

30, 340, OO

BASE BID + ADDITIVE ALTERNATE NO.1 $

a 5 lod § 50 SO

- fie

Fo or mi liven Five. Hundred Sixty +Wo

TOTAL OF BID ITEMS

Thevsan kh E lent Yundred Two ———

Dollars and

(Words -Base Bid + Additive Alternate No.1) Ly f -
f if”

cents

Sunt M27 Rov ae Cor pony oN

Authorized Signature: d/ ho WA Pre oa “hon +>

Date: Tho 4 eS Gq L207. r=

Address 29 Gonshinhm Dr, Hudsicn AH O365|
dione (o>) BB - S400 |

bob @ » SUNShine pacing CON

Email Address:

SOV-4 of 4

SUNSHINE PAVING CORPORATION
29 CONSTITUTION DRIVE
HUDSON, NH 03051
(603) 886-5400

City of Nashua — Project Awards in the past 5 year

Project Name: 2021 Residential Roadways Paving Program

Scope of Work: Machine Paving, Hand Paving. Joint Adhesive, Cold Planing, Milling of Transitions
Reclamation, Excavation, Gravel Installation, Grading, Structures, Drainage, (leeching Basins, Catch
Basins and Pipe Installation), Granite and Bituminous Curbing, Traffic Loops, Traffic Maintenance,
Loam & Seed, Temporary and Thermoplastic Striping.

Contract Amount: $4,585,195.00

City Project Lead: Mark Saunders, saundersm@nashuanh.gov, (603) 589-3120

Project Name: 2021 Paving Program — Arterial and Collector Roadways

Scope of Work: Machine Paving, Hand Paving. Joint Adhesive, Cold Planing, Milling of Transitions
Reclamation, Excavation, Gravel Installation, Grading, Structures, Drainage, (leeching Basins, Catch
Basins and Pipe Installation), Granite and Bituminous Curbing, Traffic Loops, Traffic Maintenance,
Loam & Seed, Temporary and Thermoplastic Striping.

Contract Amount: $4,191,007.50

City Project Lead: Mark Saunders, , saundersm@nashuanh.gov, (603) 589-3120

Project Name: 2020 Paving Program Contract #1

Scope of Work: Machine Paving, Hand Paving. Joint Adhesive, Cold Planing, Milling of Transitions
Reclamation, Excavation, Gravel Installation, Grading, Structures, Drainage, (leeching Basins, Catch
Basins and Pipe Installation), Granite and Bituminous Curbing, Traffic Loops, Traffic Maintenance,
Loam & Seed, Temporary and Thermoplastic Striping.

Contract Amount: $4,014,750.00

Complete Date: December 15, 2021

City Project Lead: Mark Saunders, saundersm@nashuanh.gov, (603) 589-3120

Project Name: 2020 Paving Program Contract #2

Scope of Work: Machine Paving, Hand Paving. Joint Adhesive, Cold Planing, Milling of Transitions
Reclamation, Excavation, Gravel Installation, Grading, Structures, Drainage, (leeching Basins, Catch
Basins and Pipe Installation), Granite and Bituminous Curbing, Traffic Loops, Traffic Maintenance,
Loam & Seed, Temporary and Thermoplastic Striping.

Contract Amount: $4,262.733.75

Complete Date: December 15, 2021

City Project Lead: Mark Saunders, Saundersm@nashuanh.gov, (603) 589-3120

Project Name: 2019 Local & Collector Roadways

Scope of Work: Machine Paving, Hand Paving. Joint Adhesive, Cold Planing, Milling of Transitions
Reclamation, Excavation, Gravel Installation, Grading, Structures, Drainage, (Catch Basins and Pipe
Installation), Granite and Bituminous Curbing, Traffic Loops, Traffic Maintenance, Loam & Seed,
Temporary and Thermoplastic Striping.

Contract Amount: $4,436,399.97

Completion Date: December 15, 2020

City Project Lead: Mark Saunders, saundersm@nashuanh.gov , (603) 589-3120

City of Nashua

Purchasing Department
Administrative Services Division (603) 589-3330
229 Main Street - Nashua, NH 03060 Fax (603) 594-3233

February 23, 2022
Memo #22-243

TO: Mayor Donchess
Finance Committee

SUBJECT: Pedestrian Infrastructure Conditions Assessment in the amount not to exceed $42,500
funded from 55699 Other Contracted Services/Bond

Please see attached communications from Daniel Hudson, City Engineer, dated February 24, 2022 for
project specific details related to this purchase. Below please find a summary of the purchase approval
request:

Item: Conditions assessment to establish an inventory of pedestrian infrastructure
needs to enhance ADA compliance and identify priorities for improvement &
maintenance planning.

Value: $42,500

Vendor: Nashua Regional Planning Commission

Department: 160 Admin/Engineering

Source Fund: 55699 Other Contracted Services/ Bond

Ordinance: Pursuant to NRO § 5-83 Professional Services (A) In the purchase of accounting,
architectural, auditing, engineering, legal, medical and ambulance services and
purchases of independent professional consultant services for personnel, data
processing, actuarial, planning, management and other comparable purchases
competitive bidding shall not be required.

The Board of Public Works (2/24/2022 BPW meeting), Division of Public Works: Engineering, and the
Purchasing Department respectfully request your approval of this contract.

Regards,
Kelly Parkinson

Purchasing Manager

Ce: D Hudson
C O'Connor

To:

From:

Re:

E. Motion:

Attachment:

Discussion:

City of Nashua, Public Works Division

Board of Public Works Meeting Date: February 24, 2022

Daniel Hudson, P.E., City Engineer
Engineering Department

City-Wide Pedestrian Infrastructure Conditions Assessment and Ranking

To approve the award of the City-Wide Pedestrian Infrastructure Conditions Assessment
and Ranking contract to Nashua Regional Planning Commission (NRPC) of Nashua, NH
in the amount of $42,500. Funding will be through: Department: 161 Streets; Fund: Bond;
Activity: Sidewalk Construction.

Exhibit A - Scope of Work

Nashua is committed to creating accessible paths of travel in the public rights-of-way for
people of all abilities. In order to enhance compliance with the Americans with
Disabilities Act (ADA), a city-wide inventory of pedestrian infrastructure is needed. This
inventory will assist the City in identifying priority locations for improvements and
maintenance and will become the primary input to a comprehensive ADA plan.

The Nashua Regional Planning Commission (NRPC) is an agency that serves as a
resource to support and enhance local transportation planning with an understanding of
State and Federal requirements as well as offering mapping and data services that utilize
the latest technologies. The New Hampshire Department of Transportation (NHDOT)
has developed a GIS data collection framework known as the Statewide Asset Data
Exchange System, or SADES, which has been specifically tailored to capture pedestrian
infrastructure data for ADA compliance. In 2020, NRPC partnered with the City to
conduct a city-wide pedestrian Level of Service Analysis that included 17 miles of
SADES pedestrian infrastructure assessment, which was completed successfully.

The City would like to again contract with NRPC to further the data collection effort
using SADES technology and complete a city-wide inventory, conditions assessment and
ranking in partnership with the Engineering Department for a cost of $42,500. Attached
is the Scope of Work to be completed.

Exhibit A
Scope of Work: City-Wide Pedestrian Infrastructure Conditions Assessment and Ranking

SYNOPSIS:

The City of Nashua, NH (the City) is committed to creating accessible paths of travel in the public right-
of-way for people of all abilities. In order to enhance compliance with the Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA), the City desires to complete a city-wide inventory of pedestrian infrastructure. Once
complete, this inventory will assist the City in identifying priority locations for improvements and
maintenance and will become the primary input to a comprehensive ADA plan.

EXISTING RESOURCES:

The City and The Nashua Regional Planning Commission (NRPC) have a solid base of resources and
expertise to ensure the success of this project. Specifically,

¢ The New Hampshire Department of Transportation (NHDOT) has developed a cloud GIS mobile
data collection framework known as the Statewide Asset Data Exchange System, or SADES, and
made this framework available to the nine RPCs in the state. Built on the ESRI ArcGIS for Server,
ArcGIS Online, and ESRI Collector stack, the SADES system establishes a primary inventory and
maintainable condition assessment process for transportation assets in the state. SADES has
been specifically tailored to capture pedestrian infrastructure data for ADA compliance.

e NRPC is well-versed in SADES. NRPC partnered with the City of Nashua in 2020 to conduct a
city-wide pedestrian Level of Service Analysis that included 17 miles of SADES pedestrian
infrastructure assessment. Additionally, in 2017 NRPC inventoried seven miles of sidewalk, 18
crosswalks, and 103 curb ramps along Daniel Webster Hwy in Merrimack, NH.

e The City has a robust geographic information system (GIS) that includes new city-wide location
data on sidewalks and crosswalks. These features will serve as an important input into the
SADES GIS data model and will be further developed through the course of the project. Any
missing or misclassified sidewalks and crosswalk features will be corrected, all necessary
attributes will be added, and an inventory of curb ramps and pedestrian signals will be created.

PROJECT PHASES
Phase 1: Field Data Collection

In partnership with the City, the Nashua Regional Planning Commission (NRPC) will complete a
comprehensive city-wide program of field data capture for sidewalks, crosswalks, curb ramps, and
pedestrian signals. This infrastructure will be compiled into a spatial database that includes the
presence or absence of features, their relative condition, and associated physical barriers. This work
expands upon the 17 linear miles of sidewalk already surveyed by NRPC during summer of 2020. This
project will primarily consist of an extensive field data collection campaign using state-of-the-art mobile
and cloud-based GIS.

City of Nashua City-Wide Pedestrian Infrastructure Conditions Assessment and Ranking

Nashue
Soff remo}
Paralle
Aspnak
Remo Cond ton Gooe

Crosswalk Dsts Yes

Cond'vors On end OF Asmp = No :
ars Flush ™ Legend

Does Curd Ramp neve

Detectable Warn nas? .

Dereccable Warnings ‘ Town Boundaries _Query result
écle Warning Full W dh .

Dees Ramp have Flared Sites? ay, 4SADES Pedestrian Access Buttons
Do Onhet fonderens *
Zoom to

SADES Curb Ramps

SADES Sidewalks

SADES Crosswalks

Figure 1: Example SADES interactive map of curb ramp ADA attributes.

Phase 2: Data Analysis and Mapping

SADES provides an analytical approach to the ADA assessment of assets. {n addition to a qualitative
categorization (Good/Fair/Poor), NRPC will create a spreadsheet model that maps both binary (yes/no)
and numeric characteristics to ADA ratings, assigned attribute weights, and allows for scoring of
individual assets on a relative scale of 0-100.

All maps, GIS data, and spreadsheets developed under the project will be prepared and delivered to the
City in a compatible ESRI format for integration in the City’s GIS.

pg. 2

Surface
Road Name _* Material
Heritage Rail Tra Asphalt

Central St Asphalt
Main St Concrete
Main St Concrete
Spring St Concrete
Kinsley St Concrete
Main St Concrete
Abbott St Asphalt
Concord St Concrete
Cedar St Concrete
Kinstey St Concrete
Abbott St Asphalt
Palm St Concrete
Donna St Asphalt
Ledge St Concrete
Atwood Ct Asphalt
Garden St Concrete
Palm St Concrete
Lock St Asphalt
Ledge St Concrete
West Hollis St Concrete
West Pearl St Brick
Factory St Concrete
Whitney St Asphalt
Elm St Concrete
Garden St Concrete
West Pearl St — Brick
Kinsley St Concrete
West Hollis St Concrete
Kinsley St Concrete
Grove St Concrete
Amherst St Concrete
Canal St Concrete
Manchester St Concrete
Water St Concrete
West Hollis St Concrete
tock St Asphalt
Palm St Concrete
Garden St Concrete
Garden St Concrete
West Pearl St Brick
Orange St Concrete
Whitney St Asphalt
Walnut St Asphalt
Walnut St Concrete
Factory St Concrete
West Hollis St Concrete

City of Nashua City-Wide Pedestrian Infrastructure Conditions Assessment and Ranking

Sidewal
k Curb
Conditio Conditi
“on _Y_ Surface Defect.” Curb TypL™_ on
Good None None N/A
Fair None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Fair Cracks Granite Good
Good Cracks Concrete Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Fair
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Fair
Good Cracks Other Fair
Good Cracks Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Fair
Good None Concrete Good
Good Cracks Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Fair
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Concrete Good
Good None Concrete Fair
Good Cracks Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good Cracks Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good None Granite Good
Good Cracks Granite Good
Fair Cracks Granite Good
Fair Missing Material Granite Fair
Good Cracks Granite Good
Good None Granite Good

Existence

Minimum Curb ofa
~ Reveal

0 None None
4.75 Bicycle Lan None
5 None Moveable Objec

5.5 Parking Sp. Fixed Object
3 Parking Sp. Utility Pole
4.25 Grass Strip None
4 Parking Sp. Vegetation
S Parking Sp. Utility Pole
3.75 None None
4.5 Parking Sp. Utility Pole
2.5 Parking Sp. Fixed Sign
6 Parking Sp. Hydrant
6.5 Parking Sp. Fixed Sign
5 Grass Strip None
6 Parking Sp. Utility Pole
2.5 Parking Sp. None

2 None None
4.75 None Fixed Sign
0 None None
4,25 None Hydrant
5.25 Parking Sp. None
2 None Fixed Object
2.25 None Moveable Objec
45 None None
2 None None
5.5 Other None

4 Parking Sp. Moveable Objec
6 None None
3 Parking Sp. Fixed Sign

6.5 None Utility Pole
2.25 None None
3.5 None Utility Pole
5 None Fixed Sign
4.5 None Hydrant
4.75 Parking Sp. Fixed Object
4.5 None Utility Pole
3.75 None None
4 Other Fixed Sign
3 None None
7 None Fixed Object

2.75 Parking Sp. Fixed Object
4 Parking Sp. None
2.5 None Utility Pole
2.5 Parking Sp. Utility Pole
3 Parking Sp. Fixed Sign
2.75 None Moveable Objec
5 None Utility Pole

Passable Width
| Buffer _~ Obstructions _¥_ {in.}

Minimum Vertical
x. Clearance
113 Greater than 80 inches
68 Greater than 80 inches
89 Greater than 80 inches
97 Greater than 80 inches
60 Greater than 80 inches
58 Greater than 80 inches
108 Greater than 80 inches
50 Greater than 80 inches
$2 Greater than 80 inches
$4 Greater than 80 inches
48 Greater than 80 inches
38 Greater than 80 inches
62 Greater than 80 inches
59 Greater than 80 inches
41 Greater than 80 inches
56 Greater than 80 inches
65 Greater than 80inches
45 Greater than 80inches
59 Greater than 80 inches
46 Greater than 80 inches
59 Greater than 80 inches
54 Greater than 80 inches
61 Greater than 80 inches
57 Greater than 80 inches
56 Greater than 80 inches
55 Greater than 80 inches
51 Greater than 80 inches
60 Less than 80 inches
64 Greater than 80 inches
42 Greater than 80 inches
46.5 Greater than 80 inches
60.5 Greater than 80 inches
48 Greater than 80 inches
75 Greater than 80 inches
59 Greater than 80 inches
46 Greater than 80 inches
60 Greater than 80 inches
50 Greater than 80 inches
54 Greater than 80 inches
54 Greater than 80 inches
59 Greater than 80 inches
60 Greater than 80 inches
50 Greater than 80 inches
53 Greater than 80 inches
81 Greater than 80 inches
84 Greater than 80 inches
82 Greater than 80 inches

Maximu Maxi

m mum
Change Horizo Maxim
in ntal um

Profile Spacin Grade Cross

18

1.6

0.25 45
41

13

5

25

11

1

3.6

2.9

17

12

12.5

0.5

0.25 6.8
13

19

9.6

0.4

1.25 2.5
75

1

45

0.76 43
15 3.7
8&5

15 2.4
0.7

5.5

1 6.6
0.25 3

1 10.6

25 18
1 1.4

Figure 2: Example SADES ranked model output (Note: for the sake of brevity, not all contributing attributes are shown)

pg. 3

12
3
12
12
LS
3
3.4
44
4
0.9
3
3.4
4
3.7
Li
74
2.1
15
7.9
0.3
2.2
8.9
2.7
2
45
3.7
13.9

Total

Lin.) 1+ g(in=1(%) = Slope (%2 Rating

Normalize
Zd Rankin)
23 88
35 82
44 78
47 76
47 76
50 74
53 73
55 72
56 71
$7 71
61 69
61 69
63 68
63 68
63 68
64 67
65 67
66 66
66 66
66 66
67 66
69 65
69 65
69 65
70 64
70 64
71 64
71 64
72 63
72 63
73 63
74 62
76 61
76 61
77 61
79 60
79 60
80 89
81 59
82 58
82 58
82 58
83 s8
84 s?7
85 $7
85 57
86 56

City of Nashua City-Wide Pedestrian Infrastructure Conditions Assessment and Ranking

: e 2 6 Aver Shattuck St ¢
Nashua Bike-Ped Level of Service £ és wa wn peasant St g" tamst pons Ly Ay neve ly
+ e 6
. NAG A %
s ” po x ‘te

Sidewalk and Curb Ramp Conditions ““""™" os Lock St §
Sidewalk Condition g
4N/ Good £ é Brigham s,
~ Fak H Hughey st
‘OOF Hevae
Ramp Condition Sas
o Fair Tanga St
e@ Poor
ie
a
&
=
wigs gS
‘S auhbes
wet ag? gate
& ws 4 we ~
at Se
? 4% 4, Z ‘ < q i
€ fo? ey *) Y o ay % 3 % a> ye aids St 3
& eget? gg %, % yD F) 40 4 15, LOH so WP rest ABS St pad NE ‘ica
"ry 3 y* 9 % “eG %. e é ee eo Sesh
m = ba E &*s T + ¥ *, % ‘ % & we oS rang eco carters
oe iat “a 4% 2 es 3 per” 2
wae oe i Pid o% iat ene 4 ThA. J F porsel Ue Meno Ae
Ee" @D 7 eral
Nashua Bike-Ped Level of Service Ye Se oe i \ Sums pen 4 4 Ly rere
3 ors 0 a Surrenes A ¥ * ;
Crosswalk Conditions petatsd os a 4 7 a, tae i 3 o* Leos
"erg a oq be eo gd ge
AP No Lighted Utilities £ a, Py, i writen 2 i i
AS Faded Paint A nese Hy * %,,, Sot? get Tare a * Rows Fe a
AS Faded Paint and No Lights i rye § emus % 4 ot 7 aes fj tons §
AVA No Deficiencies Noted pets ra 9 @ go gaeem Or gf uF
3 3 g 3 an eck gots & g Gaeape Avt aE wo?
iis ers
3 Tarps $1 Sy 8 A wee ? . & Ly i 18 #,
tf é . s, onan wat ae 4 ,, vé i wg 4
% wine 9 ot Fem, “a root pee? be
a eo gy or® o
} ene 6 WO ne rem
MiP gh e° e ven een? 3
gs . aod He § Me oe? ” wears
x! .
4 AAG BE Lee ROP Best ower ME wart |
wont greene °* 7 .? se be
% 2% % oe 4 > oer ii St yor? ©
o” thy: eds 2 Bh & gar es OF a esa
se Ld we ’ yore aS
” 4 ns Wa ara \ 5s a. i er
, a? 4% € «, 4% ge ¢ oe 3 we 4 % Oe z 4°
f ote ae : yy \ 7 ye % 6 wa? FO
fe, e (se a *, %,°¢ . 2 i > gi? ee AREY 54st Ot seek
& ’ ba, VF % ad g a f a e % xs 5 $ % esta ort Spexing DS acute
* bd Ww
wor ge a oso? + 3 as <3 2 43,48 j a i wr
wttoas oS Ca - 2 i: oor FE 2” § beatae ad

Figure 3: Relative Conditions Assessment: 2020 SADES Pedestrian Infrastructure Pilot for Nashua.

pg. 4