Board Of Aldermen - Agenda - 11/26/2019 - P190
To be disciplined for just cause only;
To determine if a hearing will be a public or nonpublic session in accordance with
RSA 91- A:3, Il (a);
To be notified that a documented complaint has been received from a citizen
against an employee, unless said notification would directly interfere with an on-
going investigation conducted by the Nashua Police Department.
An employee, being interviewed where discipline could result or at a
meeting/hearing concerning pending discipline, will be afforded one representative
from the Collective Bargaining Unit only as it pertains to the below listed procedures
under NLRB v. Weingarten:
6G The employee must reasonably believe that the interview will result in
disciplinary action;
6 The employee must request such representation;
UO The exercise of the right to representation cannot unduly interfere with
legitimate needs of the employer.
During an investigation conducted by the Nashua Police Department of an offense
committed which could result in criminal proceedings, administrative rights may be
provided to the employee. The administrative rights as outlined under Garrity v.
New Jersey are to:
~=Advise the employee that the answers to the questions will not be used against
the employee in criminal proceedings;
G Order the employee to answer the questions under threat of disciplinary
actions; and
O Ask questions which are specifically, directly, and narrowly related to the
employee's duties or the employee's fitness for duty.
As outlined under Cleveland Board of Education v. Loudermill, prior to discipline
being imposed (pre-disciplinary hearing/meeting), an employee is entitled to
receive:
O §©Awritten notice of the charge(s);
OQ Agist of the allegations;
O Possible disciplinary action(s) to be taken; and
O An opportunity to be heard.
