Search

Date: 10/10/2019

1 inch:472 feet

DISCLAIMER: The data contained on this web site is provided for public convenience. The City of Nashua makes no warranty, representation or guaranty as
io the content, sequence, accuracy, timeliness or completeness of any of the database information provided herein. The City of Nashua expressly disclaims
any representations and warrantees, including, without limitation, the implied warrantees of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose.

The City of Nashua, NH assumes no liability for its use, availability, or compatibility with user's software or computers.

City of Nashua, NH

"NW Hamenerags Garr Cory

> nnn 4

ter 185

SUBJECT PARCEL:
LALMONT ST

Ownership Information:

GIMAK PROPERTIES, LLC

7JENNY HILL LN
NASHUA NH 03062

Parcel Information:

PARCEL ID: 103-103
ACCT NUM: o5e60
LAND AREA: 0.11
LAND USE: N/A
BUIDING STYLE: N/A
LAND VALUE: 47,400
BLDG VALUE: 5,000
TOTAL VALUE: 52,400

Sales Information:

SALE DATE: Oct 42019

PRICE: 72,533
BOOK PG: 9217/555

QUALIFIED: NEEDS REVI

0103 00103 1 of 1 TOTALASSESSED: 52,400

a 125260!
Sheet Lot Unit# Bldg# other CARD Nashua

PROPERTY LOCATION IN PROCESS APPRAISAL SUMMAR
| No Alt No Direction/Street/City Use Code Building Value Yarditems LandSize Land Value Total Value Legal Description User Acct
| L ALMONT ST, Nashua 1060 5,000 5000.000 47,400 52,400 [Dese:
OWNERSHIP Unit #: GIS Ref

Owner [NUTE, STEPHEN M & 3 AlOT- UPDATED AS oF 16/10/14 1035602.2102
| Owner |NUTE, LISAA - GIS Ref
Leer Total Gard 5,000 0.115 47,400 52,400 Entered Lot Size B0696.6 -
"Street [18 HUMMINGBIRD LN Ml = oti ids —— Joel Le: Insp Date Pp atriot
—o Source: [Market Adj Co | Total Value per SQ unit /Card |N/A | (Parc|N/A_ Land Unit Type: Haare Properties Inc.
| Twn/Cit| HUDSON PREVIOUS ASSESSMENT Parcel ID [0103-00103 USER DEFINED
| SUProv|NH | Cntr] Own Oc} Tax Yr Use Cat Bldg Value rd Item Land Size Land Value Total Value Asses‘d Valu Notes Date Prior Idi
|_ Postal: |03051 Type| 2017 1060 FV 7400 5,000. 42,400 43,800 43,800 |Year End Roll 11/6/2017 IpRINT PID: |103-103

2016 1060 FV 1400 5,000. 42,400 43,800 43,800|Year End Roll 11/16/2018 [ate | Time Plan #:

"Owner 2015 1080 FV 1400 5,000, 42,400 ~—— 43,800 43,800 1116/2018 ne Prior Id #
Owner 2014 1060 FY 1400 5,000. 42,400 43,800 43,800 |Roll 10/6/2015 pee | Prior id #

Street 2013 1060 FV 1400 5,000. 42,400 43,800 43,800 |Year End 10/28/2013 LAST R Prior Id # IL
TwniGit 2012 1060 FV 1400 5,000. 42,400 43,800 43,800 Year End Roll 11/9/2012 Date | Time | Code Dat
StlProv 2011 1060 FV 1400 5,000. 42,400 43,800 43,800 | Year End Roll 11/9/2011 |o6/07/1 |11:08:4 | Code Sta
oor 2010 1060 FV 1400 5,000. 42,400 ~—-43,800 43,800 Year End Roll 4/15/2010 | wavercie Prior Id #

This Parcel contains 5,000 Sq Feet of land mainly Grantor LegalRef Typ Date Sale Code Sale Price V Tst Verif Assoc PCL Value Notes Fact Dist:
classified as AC LND IMP 3306-817 5/9/1985 2,000 No No RELATION Reval Dis
Year:
LandReas
OTHERASSESSMENTS.———SCS een
Code _Descrip/No Amount Com. Int
BUILDING PERMITS ACTIVITY INFORMATION
Date Number Descrip Amount C/O Last Visit Fed Cod F. Descrip Comment Date Result By Name
PROPERTY FACTORS 4/8/1991 Meas+List cD

Ite |Code| Descip | % | Item | Cod | Descrip
zZ |RB- {RB Ufc JALL

° t

n I

Census:

Flood Haz: xmpt
D Topo |Vi5 |LEVELR

Ss Stree |1 PAVED -

t Traffi signt / /

LAND SECTION (First 7 lines only) _ - =
[oad Description a ie oe ne he Unit Type Land Type caeie wae Se Adj Neigh pe eigh Iinfl1 % Infl2 |% Infl3 % — Ae % ee ey is Fact Use Value Notes
1060 AC LND IMI 5000 Sq Feet SITE 1.0 0 10.96 0.864 NF 0.95 5 ~30 47,375 9 1. 47,400

Total AC/H [0.11478 Total SF/S|5000.00 _| ParcelLU/106 |ACLNDIMP | Prime NB D [NEW FAIR | | Total:| 47,375) | Spl Cre| | Total:[ 47,400)

Disclaimer: This Information is believed to be correct but is subject to change and is not warranteed. Database: ArchiveProNashuaNH apro 2018

EXTERIOR INFORMATION BATH FEATURES COMMENTS SKETCH
| Type: | Full Ba Ratin FNC FSP HAS ELEC 040891 2:17 MH
Sty Ht: A Bath: Ratin '
(Liv) Units | Total] | | 3/4 Bat Ratin
| Foundatio A3QBt Ratin
Frame: 1/2 Bat Ratin
| Prime Wa AHBth Ratin
Sec Wall: |__| OthrFix Ratin Ree Loe Fil
Roof st Res es|Line nit}1
a STHER FEATUR ES Level [FY LRDR D K FRRRBRFBHBL O
Color: A Kits: Ratin Othe
View / De Frpl: Ratin Pe
GENERAL INFORMATION | WSFiu Ratin Lyi
_ Grade: CONDO INFORMATION Low
| Year Bit Eff Yr Bit: Location: Total_| RMs:| [ BR] | Bath] [A] |
| Alt LUC Alt %: Total Unit
Jurisdict Fact: |. Floor: REMODELING RES BREAKDOWN
___ Const Mod: % Own: Exterior No Uni RMS BRS FL
| Lump Sum Adj Name: Interior: 1 0 0
INTERIOR INFORMATION DEPRECIATION sc
Avg HUFL Phys Con|AV -Average | 0.0]% | Kitchen:
Prim Int Functiona % |_ Baths:
Sec intwW | [% Economic % | Plumbin
Partition: Special: % neces Totals
i Override: % | Heating
Pen — ef ee SUBAREA — ST
Bsmnt Fir CALC SUMMARY COMPARABLE SALES Code Description Area-SQ Rate-AV Undepr Value Pos oi Daserip Pl du be
Bsmnt Ga Basic $/ SQ: Rate Parcel ID Typ Date | Sale Price
Electric: Size Adj. |1.0000000
Insulation: Const Aqj.: |8.0000000
Int vs Ext: Adj $/ SQ:
Heat Fuel Other Features |0
Heat Typ Grade Factor:
# Heat S Neighborhood | |1.0000000
Iie Heated % AC: Lue Factor: 100 LWtavsis| | AvRat] _| ind.v |[ Net Sketched Area | [Total:]
| Solar HW Central V Adj Total: |0 Juris. Factor: Before De [0.00 || Size A] | Gross Ar] | FinAr]
% Com % Sprinkl Depreciation: |0 Special Featur [0 Val/Su Ne IMAGE . .
Depreciated Tot |0 Final Total: (0 Val/Su Sz AssessPro Patriot Properties, Inc
SPEC FEATURES/YARD ITEM PARCEL ID (0103-00103 |
Code Description A Y/ Qty Size/Dim Qual Con Year Unit Price D/ Dep LUC Fact NBF ApprValue JCoJFac Juris. Value
FOP SCREEN HOL D Y 1 240 A AV 1992 28.42 T | 26 1060 1. 5,000 §,000

| Total Yard Itern |

5,000] | Total Special Featue |

| Total:| 5,000.

Book:9217 Page:555

_ Return to: Doc # 9044971 10/04/2049 09:39:21 AM.
. GIMAK Properties, LLC . Book 9217 Page 555 Page i of 2
q Jenny Lill Lane . Edward Sapienza
, Register of Deeds, Hillsborough County
Nashua, NFL 03062 . LCHIP HIA506994 25.00
TRANS TAX HI119835 1,088.00
WARRANTY DEED

KNOW ALL MEN BY THESE PRESENTS, that we, Stephen M. Nute and: Lisa ‘A.
Nute, a married couple of 18 Hummingbird Lane, Hudson, Hillsborough County, New
_ Bampshire 03051

for consideration paid
grant to

GIMAK Properties, LLC, a New Hampshire Limited Liability Company, having a
mailing address of 7 Jenny Hill Lane, Nashua, Hillsborough County, New Hampshire 03062

with WARRANTY COVENANTS

A certain tract or parcel of land, with any improvements thereon, known as Lot 103, on
Sheet 103, on Almont Street in Nashua, Hillsborough County, New Hampshire. Said lot and
Sheet numbers being on the Assessor’s Map of the City of Nashua.

‘Meaning and intending to describe and convey the same premises as conveyed.to Stephen
M. Nute and Lisa A. Nute by deed of Frances J. Nute dated May 9, 1985 and recorded i in the
Hillsborough County Registry of Deeds at Book 3306, Page 0817.

THIS 15 NOT HOMESTEAD PROPERTY OF THE WITHIN GRANTORS,

t

Book:9217 Page:556_

In witness whereof, we have hereunto set our hands this et day of October, 2019,

Techodrs (eared Lege. BD (me

Witness <ba Gesthh Stepiten M ute

| : bga AA Lisle
Witness ‘ Lisa A. Nute

STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE .

COUNTY OF EFILLSBOROUGH

On this the Af Nay of October, 2019, before me, the undersigned officer, personally
appeared Stephen M. Nute and Lisa A. Nute, known to me (or satisfactorily proven) to be the
persons whose name are subscribed to the foregoing instrament and acknowledged that they

_executed the same for the purposes contained herein.
Teberke ON keiond

Notary Public / Fisties- ofthe Pence

ling
> Pg kt
Senet,
S a Oo
Sas MY
3 rad * COMMISSION *.
= fy EXPIRES 4 3
2b eG. 19,204 &
3 - * dey ews
% Anon ue OS
“Uppers se '
OTT bt APO

MIE Se
“Ate OO

SS

eS

* Planning 603-589-3090
C 1 ty 0 f N as h ua Fire Marshal Office 603-389-3460

Addressing Committee GIS Department
229 Main Street Nashua Police Department
Nashua, New Hampshire 03061-2019 Legal Department

Street Re-Numbering Petition

To: Aldermen, Alderwomen and Mayor

From: Adam Pouliot, Fire Marshal; Captain Thomas Bolton Jr.; Pam Andruskevich, GIS
Tech.; Sarah Marchant, CDD Director; Marcia Wilkins, Planner I; Celia Leonard,
Esquire.

RE: Sheet 103/Lot 103 Almont St

In Accordance with RSA 231:133-a and NRO 190-213, the Board of Alderman have the
sole authority to assign or alter address numbers of buildings and other property along
any public or private way in the municipality. The New Hampshire Addressing Standards
Guide developed by NH E91 |defines the universal safety standards for addressing in NH.
The City of Nashua has been notified by the Division of Emergency Services and
Communications that collection of data has begun in the City in March of 2019.

The request before you is to assign a numerical address where no compliant address is
available with the current NH E911 Standards. This lot of record has been granted
variances from the City of Nashua Zoning Board of Adjustment to construct a single
family residence.

It is this Committee’s strong recommendation to continue to move forward in a way that
will not create a noncompliant situation for future residents. We recommend 26 Almont
St (sheet 103-lot 97) be renumbered to 24 Almont; 28 Almont St (sheet 103-lot 101) be
renumbered to 26 Almont; and sheet 103 lot 103 be numbered 28 Almont St.

We would further recommend a less compliant but acceptable numbering of sheet 103 lot
103 to 28 4 Almont St. We do not recommend using the letter A as an assigned address
as this is reserved for Accessory Dwelling Units.

Respectfully submitted,
Addressing Committee

Date: January 6, 2022
To: Jim Donchess, Mayor; Finance Committee
From: Camille Correa, Transit Administrator

Re: — Contract with Schroeder for the Waste Line Project at NTS Administration building
located at 11 Riverside St.

Request:

NTS is requesting the Finance Committee to approve a grant funded contract with Schroeder
Construction Management in the amount of $98,366 to perform the replacement of the Waste
Line and Building Repairs at the Nashua Transit Administration Building located at 11
Riverside, Nashua, NH 03062.

Background:

On September 13, 2021 NTS solicited proposals from qualified vendors for the Sewer
Replacement & Building Repairs project located at the Nashua Transit Administration
Building, 11 Riverside Street, Nashua, NH 03062. NTS received one bid from Schroeder
Construction Management, Inc.

Project Scope of Work includes the replacement of the 4” cast iron waste piping from the
interior bathrooms to the exterior sewer connection, the replacement of cast iron waste piping
connecting the water closets, urinal and lavatories to the main waste line with PVC piping and
to reconnect to existing venting. The work is intended to be completed without impacting
interior wall structures except for sheetrock replacement as needed. As part of this contract the
flooring tile in the construction area will be replaced.

Request Amount: $98,366

\(whbipra)iBedlonf\52700.00 Nashua
‘Ciroulabon StudyiraportsiFinal ReportFinal
Raepor docs

@

45

Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.

Study Findings

To improve vehicular mobility, strengthen transit, pedestrian, and bicycle
connections, and to enhance accessibility for residents and businesses, the City
should consider converting some of the Downtown’s one-way streets to two-way
flow. However, changing the circulation patterns of several streets at the same time
can be disruptive and therefore it would be best to implement these types of actions
over time. Some of the actions could be implemented now, some in the future, and
some would be best implemented as part of future roadway reconfiguration projects.

Walnut Street Oval

Reconfiguring the Walnut Street Oval would not only afford the City an opportunity
to enhance access to the Downtown from the west (complimenting the Broad Street
Parkway), but it would also provide a tremendous opportunity to both encourage
redevelopment and introduce a more pedestrian friendly appeal to the area.

A range of reconfiguration alternatives were considered. Although each option has
its advantages and disadvantages, the dual roundabout option would appear to
provide the best opportunity to enhance vehicular and pedestrian mobility while
encouraging area redevelopment.

Advancing the roadway reconfiguration, solely as a City improvement project,
would be costly and as result could take many years. However, if there was an
opportunity for this type of roadway reconstruction project to be constructed by the
private sector as part of a larger redevelopment plan where the City and one or more
property developers worked together, this type of project could advance much
quicker. To advance this concept, the City should share the reconfiguration concept
with interested area property developers and initiate discussions with them in an
effort to spark interest in the area's redevelopment opportunities.

Water Street

If one or more private developers, in collaboration with the City, were to advance a
pedestrian friendly redevelopment plan for the Walnut Street Oval area, it would be
advantageous to provide continuous pedestrian connectivity to the Nashua River at
Water Street. This could be done by converting the western segment of Water Street
to a pedestrian corridor. Full vehicular access and egress would be maintained for all
businesses on Water Street by way of the traffic signal controlled Main Street
intersection. The pedestrian corridor, which would connect to Factory Street, would
not only provide access to pedestrians and bicyclists, but it would provide an
aesthetically pleasing area with landscaping, benches, and great views of the River.

Study Findings

\whb\projiBedterd$27100.00 Nashua
Circulation Studyreports!Fina! AeportiFinal
Raport.dack

46

Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.

Factory Street

In addition to the aesthetic and community enhancements and the improved
pedestrian connectivity to the Nashua River, converting the western segment of
Water Street to a pedestrian corridor, would remove vehicular traffic from entering
Factory Street from Water Street and thereby negate the poor sight line issue. With
the poor sight line issue addressed, Factory Street can be converted to two-way flow.
Factory Street’s existing 36-foot curb-to-curb width would accommodate a single
travel lane in each direction while maintaining the existing on-street parking on the
north side of the street. This change would require modifications to the Main
Street/ Factory Street/Temple Street traffic signal. The City should consider
converting Factory Street to two-way, but only as part of the closure of the western
segment of Water Street.

West Pearl Street

Converting West Pearl Street to two-way flow would provide improved connectivity
to and from Main Street. The existing 36-foot curb-to-curb width along the segment
of West Pearl Street from Main Street to Elm Street would accommodate a single
travel lane per direction while allowing the City to maintain the existing on-street
parking on the north side of the street. However, because the segment of West Pearl
Street from Elm Street to Walnut Street is only 34 feet wide with on-street parking on
both sides of the street, the conversion to two-way flow would most likely result in
the loss of the existing on-street parking spaces on the south side of the street. In an
effort to minimize any loss of on-street parking, the City could consider reducing the
approximately 8’ wide sidewalk on the south side of the west end of West Hollis
Street by approximately 2 feet. This additional roadway width could accommodate
two 10’ travel lanes in addition to maintaining on-street parking on both sides of the
roadway.

This conversion to two-way operation would require modifications to the Main
Street/ East Pearl Street/West Pearl Street traffic signal. Converting West Pearl Street
to two-way flow would best be accomplished as part of any reconfiguration and
redevelopment plan for the Walnut Street Oval.

Temple Street and East Pearl Streets

Converting either Temple Street and/or East Pear! Street from their existing one-way
operation to two-way flow would improve vehicular mobility. However, the
downside of the conversion would be the loss of on-street parking and/or an existing
designated bike lane. Temple Street's existing 34-foot curb-to-curb width
accommodates a single travel lane, a bicycle lane, and on-street parking on both sides
of the street. To convert the roadway to two-way flow with a travel lane and a bike
lane in each direction would necessitate the loss of parking on both sides of the
street. Similarly, providing two-way flow on East Hollis Street, which has sections as
narrow as 28 feet, would necessitate the loss of parking and the bike lane.
Additionally, based on public input, there does not appear to be much support for
converting either Temple Street or East Pearl Street to two-way flow. For these
reasons, it may be best for the City to leave Temple Street and East Pearl as currently
configured for the time being.

Spring Street
Converting Spring Street from East Hollis Street to East Pearl Street from its existing

one-way northbound operation to two-way flow would be relatively straightforward
as the roadway currently has two travel lanes in addition to on-street parking on the
east side of the street. However, the change would require modifications to the East

Study Findings

\WwhbiprofiBadiordiS2700.00 Nashua
Circulation Sludyvreports\Final RaportFinal
Report.docn

@

47

Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc.

Hollis Street /Spring Street traffic signal. Also, patrons of the Post Office would no
longer be able to queue along one of the travel lanes when the parking lot gets
congested (as they do today) as the northbound traffic would be limited to one lane.
Nevertheless, if the City is committed to begin to convert some of its one-way streets
to two-way, Spring Street may be a good location to start.

Court Street and Park Street

Converting Court Street and Park Street to two-way operation would improve
mobility in the area and also enhance land development opportunities. Converting
Court Street to two-way operation would at a minimum involve modest
modifications, to the Court Street/Temple Street intersection such as removing the
raised channelized island on Temple Street. However, a better option would be to
initiate discussions with the owner of the 30 Temple Street property regarding the
potential redevelopment opportunities for the adjacent parcels, which perhaps could
include the reconfiguration of the intersection in such a way as to connect Spring
Street directly into the intersection. Also, given the offset configuration of the Main
Street / Park Street/Water Street intersection, it may be best to maintain the one-way
westbound restriction for the short (approximately 100’) western most section of Park
Street. Connection to Pearson Street would be maintained through the existing
parking lot. Prior to the City advancing the conversion to two-way flow along Court
Street and Park Street it would be advantageous to work with the owner of the 30
Temple Street property to consider whether a reconfiguration of the Court
Street/Temple Street intersection could be coordinated with any development
proposal.

Share the Road Philosophy

Providing additional designated bicycle lanes within the existing cross-section of the
Downtown streets would be difficult without sacrificing on-street parking. Although
there is strong advocacy for improved bicycle connectivity, there does not appear to
be strong support for providing designated bicycle lanes along Downtown streets —
particularly if doing so would impact on-street parking. Nevertheless, there are
actions that the City can take to encourage bicycle use and enhance the experience of
bicyclists. The City should continue to advance off-road opportunities for
connectivity such as the Nashua Heritage Rail Trail and the Nashua Riverwalk. Bike
racks could be installed throughout the Downtown. The City recently purchased bike
racks as part of the sidewalk reconstruction project and is currently working to
identify locations where the racks will be placed.

The City could also install more “Share the Roadway” signs, which serve to remind
motorists of the multi-model character of the Downtown. Moreover, in addition to
these specific actions, the City should, within the core of the Downtown, establish a
“Share the Road” philosophy. The concept of share the road stems from the idea that
all roadways within the core area of the Downtown should have a look and feel of an
area where motorists will expect to see and will be welcoming to pedestrians and
bicyclists. This is best accomplished by minimizing the pavement width of travel
lanes while maximizing the width of sidewalks and providing numerous areas
where people are encouraged to gather.

Concurrent Pedestrian Signal Phasing

Together with the share the road philosophy, the City should consider providing
concurrent pedestrian signal phasing at all study area intersection. Concurrent
pedestrian signal phasing allows pedestrians to cross an intersection at the same time
as in the same direction and at the same time (concurrently) with motor vehicles and

Study Findings