Search

Board of Aldermen 05-28-2019 Page 8

ON THE QUESTION

Alderman Lopez

With regards to the 50% versus 30% question, it was my recollection that that decision was made so
that we didn’t use up the entire fund on just a small group of people and so that there would be more
available for lower income people. Was that accurate? | am asking Mary Ann Melizzi-Golja.

Alderwoman Melizzi-Golja

Yes. At the second to the last meeting, which Mr. Teebom referenced where | made the motion to the
50% of AMI; Ms. Schena was with us and she had sent up a communication indicating that was her
recommendation. At our last meeting with further discussion, it was the feeling of the committee that
because this was a new program, and we weren't sure what was going to happen with our resources,
we would try it this year at 30% AMI so we would hopefully have enough money. Then depending upon
the requests for funding we would look at it in next year’s CDBG grant and look at increasing that or
lowering it as it is to 50%, that’s my recollection. | see Alderman Caron and Alderman Wilshire nodding
in agreement. So the original motion had been for 50% but then like | said after further conversation,
because it is something new that we are doing, it was determined that we should start at 30% and then
based on the response look at 50% for next year.

Alderman Clemons
To the last point, why is the minimum $1,000.00, why isn’t it $0?
Alderwoman Melizzi-Golja

The guidance we have always received Alderman Clemons and I’m saying always that we’ve received
for a number of years from Ms. Schena is that again as Mr. Teebom referenced, anything below that we
really look at being deferred maintenance or maintenance. There’s probably very few things that would
come in under $1,000.00 so that was the cut off that has been used historically for that.

Alderman Clemons

| respect that but | don’t think there’s any harm then if that’s the case in amending this to be zero or just
basically to say up to $5,000.00. So! am going to make that amendment. That’s my motion, to amend
that wording to eliminate the words “$1,000.00 and up to”. I’m sorry | am going to eliminate the
$1,000.00 so it basically says “emergency work costing up to $5,000.00”.

MOTION BY ALDERMAN CLEMONS TO AMEND TO ELIMINATE THE $1,000.00 AND REPLACE
WITH UP TO $5,000.00.
MOTION FAILS

Alderman Lopez

| would just want to point out that there are a number of cash assistance programs that are operating in
other areas too that do the same thing and they typically reach $500.00. So if the City gets into the
business of processing every single claim, then basically someone is applying for CDBG money for
much smaller and more difficult to reach repairs or emergencies, that kind of stuff. Whereas other
groups can do it better and additionally then we are subject to HUD Guidelines as to whether we accept
that or not. And it could further erode the resources for somebody who doesn’t have anywhere else to

go.

Board of Aldermen 05-28-2019 Page 9
President Wilshire

So the motion before us is to replace R-19-126 with the proposed amendments by Human Affairs.
Alderman Jette

Could | ask, this discussion we’ve just had about the $1,000.00 or the $5,000.00 is that the only change,
is that the only amendment to this?

Alderwoman Melizzi-Golja

No if you look at what is before you, the amended Resolution, the amounts that are being awarded to
each agency has been amended. So we received the initial proposals from each agency and then
based on the funds we had available to us, both in new funds we received this year as well as funds that
were not used, so we got to roll them over into this year. We then made recommendations, so some
people got nothing, some people got a percentage of what they asked for. | don’t think anyone, from
memory, got everything that they asked for. And | can share this with you in terms of what the initial
request was and the allocated amounts. That’s the most recent, but the numbers that are reflected in
the amendment are what the Committee awarded.

Alderman Jette

So in looking at this it looks like we got less than what we thought we were getting so you made
adjustments to reflect the fact that the grant is less than you expected.

Alderwoman Melizzi-Golja

Correct.

Alderman Jette

OK Thank you.

Alderwoman Melizzi-Golja

If | may, | think we have only had one year where we had fewer requests than we had money. Part of
this also is that we try to put some money aside for contingency in case any of these projects run over,
so money is also allocated there to cover any costs that were unforeseen. But typically we have more
requests than we have resources.

MOTION CARRIED

MOTION BY ALDERMAN CARON FOR FINAL PASSAGE OF R-19-126 AS AMENDED

ON THE QUESTION

Alderman Tencza

If | could just address one thing that Mr. Teebom said earlier just about the City placing a mortgage on
this property just to clarify. Essentially what the City is doing is putting a lien not a mortgage. The City
is not going to go after these folks if they owe us money, but when the property is sold, the City will seek
to recoup whatever we paid out. | don’t want people out there thinking that potentially the City is going

to be going after these low income senior citizens, that is clearly not the intent and not how the program
works.

Board of Aldermen 05-28-2019 Page 10
Alderman Caron

And I'd like to add to that, because that is a loan and we look to get that money back; that money goes
back into the pot so that we can give it out again. We never know from year to year, the needs of the
community so we feel that it is important that we try to recoup as much as we can. That’s why we
always have a little bit in the pot when we start the year off, so | thank you Alderman Tencza.

MOTION CARRIED
Resolution R-19-126 declared duly adopted as amended.

R-19-134
Endorser: Alderwoman Mary Ann Melizzi-Golja
Alderwoman-at-Large Shoshanna Kelly
Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien, Sr.
Alderman Linda Harriott-Gathright
Alderman Patricia Klee
Alderman-at-Large Brandon Michael Laws
Alderman June M. Caron
Alderman Jan Schmidt
Alderman-at-Large Lori Wilshire
ADOPTION OF STRATEGIC PLANNING GOALS
Given its second reading;

MOTION BY ALDERWOMAN MELIZZI-GOLJA FOR FINAL PASSAGE OF R-19-134
ON THE QUESTION
Alderwoman Melizzi-Golja

Yes thank you if | may make a comment, these as | have indicated at PEDC, this is the first time we
have had a work product from the Committee. These goals are looked at every 2 years. | have to thank
the members of the Committee because this process went on for a while and it was extended by an
election. So some of the Committee members changed which meant had to kind of get a perspective of
where we were in the process. As you look through the goals, | would just comment that the purpose
was really to make them broad enough that each Division / Department would be able to look at those
and come up with their own broader or more specific rather objectives to address those but just to give
some over-arching goals that would dovetail with the Mayor’s goals for the budget as well as Master
Planning moving forward for the City. | would like to thank Director Marchant and Director Cummings for
their support of this process.

MOTION CARRIED
Resolution R-19-134 declared duly adopted.

R-19-137

Endorser: Mayor Jim Donchess

AUTHORIZING THE SALE OF TAX DEEDED PROPERTY LOCATED AT 342 MAIN STREET
Given its second reading;

MOTION BY ALDERMAN O’BRIEN FOR FINAL PASSAGE OF R-19-137
MOTION CARRIED

Resolution R-19-137 declared duly adopted.

(G PENNICHUCK

PENNICHUCK CORPORATION
25 Manchester Street
Merrimack, New Hampshire 03054

PROXY STATEMENT

Annual Meeting of Sole Shareholder

This Proxy Statement is furnished to the City of Nashua, New Hampshire (the “City”), in its
capacity as the Sole Shareholder of Pennichuck Corporation (“Pennichuck Corporation” or the
“Company”), by the Board of Directors of Pennichuck Corporation, in connection with the
solicitation of a proxy to be voted at the Annual Meeting of Sole Shareholder for the purpose set
forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Sole Shareholder.

The Annual Meeting will be held at the Courtyard Marriott, 2200 Southwood Drive, Nashua,
New Hampshire, on Saturday, May 7, 2016 at 9:00 a.m.

Matter to be Voted Upon at the Annual Meeting

At the Annual Meeting, the City, in its capacity as the Sole Shareholder of Pennichuck Corporation,
ts being asked to consider and vote upon the following:

(1) To elect C. George Bower, Jay N. Lustig, John D. McGrath and Preston J.
Stanley, Jr. as directors, each for a three-year term, and until their successors
are elected and qualified.

Voting at the Annual Meeting

Background. Pennichuck Corporation was acquired by the City on January 25, 2012. This
acquisition was accomplished pursuant to an Agreement and Plan of Merger reached between the
City and Pennichuck Corporation dated November 11, 2010 (the “Merger Agreement”), The
transaction, in which the City issued $150.6 million of general obligation bonds to acquire the
outstanding stock of Pennichuck Corporation and pay all transaction costs, was authorized by
special legislation enacted by the State Legislature in 2007 and 2010. The Mayor and the Board
of Aldermen unanimously approved the acquisition pursuant to this special legislation on
January 11,2001. The New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission approved the Merger

Board of Aldermen 05-28-2019 Page 11

R-19-138
Endorsers: Alderman-at-Large Lori Wilshire
Alderwoman-at-Large Shoshanna Kelly
Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien, Sr.
Alderman Linda Harriott-Gathright
Alderman Patricia Klee
Alderman-at-Large Brandon Michael Laws
Alderman June M. Caron
Alderman Jan Schmidt
RELATIVE TO THE APPROPRIATION OF ADDITIONAL U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING
AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT HOME INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM FUNDS TO
NEIGHBORWORKS OF SOUTHERN NEW HAMPSHIRE
Given its second reading;

MOTION BY ALDERWOMAN KELLY FOR FINAL PASSAGE OF R-19-138
MOTION CARRIED

Resolution R-19-138 declared duly adopted.

R-19-140
Endorsers: Mayor Jim Donchess
Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien
Alderman Linda Harriott-Gathright
Alderman Richard A. Dowd
Alderman Patricia Klee
Alderman Tom Lopez
Alderman June M. Caron
Alderwoman-at-Large Shoshanna Kelly
Alderwoman Mary Ann Melizzi-Golja
Alderman-at-Large David C. Tencza
Alderman Jan Schmidt
Alderman-at-Large Lori Wilshire
AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF NASHUA TO ENTER INTO A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH
NASHUA
POLICE ATHLETIC LEAGUE
Given its second reading;

MOTION BY ALDERMAN O’BRIEN FOR FINAL PASSAGE OF R-19-140
MOTION CARRIED

Resolution R-19-140 declared duly adopted.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS — ORDINANCES

O-19-042
Endorsers: Alderwoman-at-Large Shoshanna Kelly
Alderman-at-Large Ben Clemons
Alderwoman Mary Ann Melizzi-Golja
Alderman Tom Lopez
Alderman Jan Schmidt
DESIGNATING THE SOUTHWEST CONSERVATION AREA AS CITY CONSERVATION LAND
Given its second reading;

MOTION BY ALDERWOMAN KELLY FOR FINAL PASSAGE OF O-19-042

Board of Aldermen 05-28-2019 Page 12

ON THE QUESTION

Alderwoman Kelly

And if | could speak on it quickly? Thank you. | just wanted to thank everyone who supported it through
the Committee. | know that the Conservation Committee has been working on this for a long time, it has
been a labor of love and something that | know Brian was involved in; so everything from stewardship to
finally naming it, so | am excited to see this happen.

President Wilshire
Thank for that, it’s nice.
Alderman Jette

| would just like to endorse that, this is mostly if not all in Ward 5. And it basically takes land that the
City has acquired, largely through donations and puts it under the jurisdiction of the Conversation
Commission. That enables the Conservation Commission to adopt the stewardship plans that
Alderwoman Kelly referred to. So this is kind of a housekeeping thing but it puts it under the jurisdiction
of the Conservation Commission so that they can regulate it and conserve the land as was intended.

MOTION CARRIED
Ordinance O-19-042 declared duly adopted.
NEW BUSINESS — RESOLUTIONS

R-19-142
Endorsers: Mayor Jim Donchess
Alderman-at-Large Lori Wilshire
Alderman Jan Schmidt
Alderman-at-Large David C. Tencza
Alderwoman Mary Ann Melizzi-Golja
Alderwoman-at-Large Shoshanna Kelly
Alderman Tom Lopez
Alderman Patricia Klee
Alderman Richard A. Dowd
Alderman Linda Harriott-Gathright
Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien
AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY TREASURER TO ISSUE BONDS NOT TO EXCEED
THE AMOUNT OF SIX MILLION TWO HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS ($6,200,000) FOR
VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS TO THE JACKSON MILLS AND MINE FALLS HYDROELECTRIC
FACILITIES
Given its first reading;

MOTION BY ALDERMAN DOWD TO ACCEPT THE FIRST READING OF R-19-142 BY ROLL CALL,
ASSIGN IT TO THE BUDGET REVIEW COMMITTEE AND THAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE
SCHEDULED FOR MONDAY, JUNE 24, 2019, AT 7:00 P.M. IN THE ALDERMANIC CHAMBER

Board of Aldermen 05-28-2019 Page 13

A viva voce roll call was taken which resulted as follows:

Yea: Alderman O’Brien, Alderman Harriott-Gathright, Alderman Dowd,
Alderman Klee, Alderman Laws, Alderman Lopez, Alderman Caron,
Alderwoman Kelly, Alderman Jette, Alderwoman Melizzi-Golja
Alderman Tencza, Alderman Schmidt, Alderman Clemons, Alderman Wilshire 14

Nay:

0

MOTION CARRIED

R-19-143

Endorsers: Mayor Jim Donchess

Alderman-at-Large Lori Wilshire
Alderman Jan Schmidt
Alderman-at-Large David C. Tencza
Alderwoman Mary Ann Melizzi-Golja
Alderwoman-at-Large Shoshanna Kelly
Alderman June M. Caron

Alderman Tom Lopez
Alderman-at-Large Brandon Michael Laws
Alderman Patricia Klee

Alderman Richard A. Dowd

Alderman Linda Harriott-Gathright
Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien

RELATIVE TO THE ACCEPTANCE AND APPROPRIATION OF $868,207.46 FROM THE
STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE, DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION (TRANSPORTATION
ALTERNATIVE PROGRAM FUNDS) INTO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT GRANT ACTIVITY
“SIDEWALK UPGRADES & BICYCLE LANES”
Given its first reading; assigned to the HUMAN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE by President Wilshire

R-19-144

Endorsers: Mayor Jim Donchess

Alderman-at-Large Lori Wilshire
Alderman Jan Schmidt
Alderman-at-Large David C. Tencza
Alderwoman Mary Ann Melizzi-Golja
Alderwoman-at-Large Shoshanna Kelly
Alderman June M. Caron
Alderman-at-Large Brandon Michael Laws
Alderman Patricia Klee

Alderman Richard A. Dowd

Alderman Linda Harriott-Gathright
Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien

RELATIVE TO THE ACCEPTANCE AND APPROPRIATION OF $60,000 FROM THE NEW
HAMPSHIRE CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INTO PARKS & RECREATION GRANT ACTIVITY
“JEFF MORIN FUND, SHADE CANOPIES AT ROBY PARK”
Given its first reading; assigned to the BUDGET REVIEW COMMITTEE and the BOARD OF PUBLIC
WORKS by President Wilshire

Board of Aldermen 05-28-2019 Page 14

R-19-145
Endorsers: Mayor Jim Donchess
Alderwoman Mary Ann Melizzi-Golja
Alderman Jan Schmidt
Alderman Richard A. Dowd
Alderman Linda Harriott-Gathright
Alderman Tom Lopez
Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien
AUTHORIZING THE CITY OF NASHUA TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT FOR EMERGENCY
AMBULANCE SERVICES WITH AMERICAN MEDICAL RESPONSE, INC.
Given its first reading; assigned to the FINANCE COMMITTEE by President Wilshire

R-19-146
Endorser: Alderman-at-Large Lori Wilshire
Alderman Richard A. Dowd
Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien
Alderman Linda Harriott-Gathright
Alderman Tom Lopez
Alderwoman Mary Ann Melizzi-Golja
AUTHORIZING THE GRANTING OF EASEMENTS TO PENNICHUCK WATER WORKS, INC.
FOR
THE CONSTRUCTION, UTILIZATION AND MAINTENANCE OF WATER LINES
Given its first reading; assigned to the COMMITTEE ON INFRASTRUCTURE and the NASHUA CITY
PLANNING BOARD by President Wilshire

NEW BUSINESS — ORDINANCES

O-19-046
Endorser: Alderman Richard A. Dowd
Alderman Jan Schmidt
Alderman Linda Harriott-Gathright
Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien
AMENDING THE ZONING MAP BY REZONING 610 AMHERST STREET FROM PARK
INDUSTRIAL (PI) TO GENERAL BUSINESS (GB)
Given its first reading;

There being no objection, President Wilshire accepted the first reading of O-19-046, assigned it
to the Planning and Economic Development Committee and the Nashua City Planning Board,
and scheduled a public hearing for Tuesday, July 16, 2019, at 7:00 p.m. in the Aldermanic
Chamber.

PERIOD FOR GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT

Lori Ortolano 41 Berkeley Street. | wanted to address some of the comments raised at the Ward
Meetings, at the Town Meetings, last week. The big issue that stuck on my mind was the Mayor spoke
with some passion about the demoralizing nature of the investigative report that was done. He had
heard from departments outside of assessing and received a number of comments from | think probably
management that said it was very demoralizing and it was a real morale killer to the offices. | have a
pretty different view of that and what is demoralizing really when you have a situation like what has
happened in the assessing office. | will relate it to my very early career when | became an engineer 35
years ago in a field that was pretty much male dominated. | got a job in a company down south and |
was very motivated, | had graduated from WPI and had done really well in my field and enjoyed it. | got
assigned to a job with a project engineer that was 5 years older than me. Busy job, big deadlines and
required some overtime and very early on it was very apparent that the older engineer was not a worker.

Board of Aldermen 05-28-2019 Page 15

He was a 20 hour a week guy and | was pretty motivated to do my job and he had a girlfriend in another
state so Friday at lunch he split and took on a road trip to the other state and rolled in Monday after
lunch when he left from that place and came back to work. Every week | would have to listen to the
details of what was happening in the shower between him and his girlfriend before he left and when he
came back. And then | had to carry the load, Thursday was 18 holes of golf in the afternoon and
Tuesday and Wednesdays were work outs at the gym.

| put up with it for about 8 months and then | was all set and | went in to management | said “I’m all set
with this, here’s what’s going on”. You know that was a very demoralizing situation for me in my career
because | worked and | had to deal with somebody who didn’t work. The gentleman left after a couple
months and moved closer to his girlfriend which was a good thing. Fast forward 5 years and | moved
my career into a new area, in a new department that had never had a woman in the department. | got
put on a very busy, classified project that was over budget and behind schedule. Management made it
very clear that there was no money for overtime and we all had to work overtime. | again get assigned
with an engineer who is probably 7 years or 8 years older than me and again wasn’t an overly motivated
person. Certainly not as bad as the first one, half-time work was pretty bad but could easily shave off 10
hours a week and never came in on a Saturday. Part-way into the project, the Project Manager, an
older gentleman ready to retire, wanted me to learn Project Management and said, “I’m going to start
sending you the budgets; | want you to look at the budgets and get familiar with them so you can step
into Project Management someday”.

When | got my first budget and | looked at it, the engineer that | was working with was being paid 60
hours of overtime a month. | was shocked, | was told there was no overtime, | was working overtime, |
never saw my constituents come in once on a Saturday and he was getting paid on a military contract. |
was floored, marched into the manager’s office and said “what’s this” you know “how is this happening’.
And the answer | got was his wife was having a baby and he was under a lot of stress and he was trying
to help him out by giving him a little extra pay. Needless to say, you know my personality now, it really
wasn't different back then and it didn’t fly with me at all. | went two layers up and | shut down that
overtime. That was very demoralizing for me. That's what a demoralizing work circumstance sounds
like to me and feels like to me.

When | look in the Assessing Office and | look at the front end of the office with the four clerical staff
women you have there; they work endlessly. They are tied to their computer screens pretty much all
day. And | think if you look at any one of their desks you are going to see just piles of paper around
them, they are just wrapped in paper. They have very set breaks; I’ve never seen an abuse of any
break time with them. | think it is pretty demoralizing when you have a Senior Assessor who leaves like
this Senior Assessor does and tells everyone “I’m heading out to the field” and signs out on the board,
“I’m going to check properties” and then you find out he’s in the park for 2 % hours or let me include that,
driving and in the park or in the Holiday Inn lot for 2, 2 % or 3 hours at a time.

President Wilshire

Ms. Ortolano, this Board does not have anything to do with personnel matters, so | would respectfully
ask that you keep your comments to what the Board has purview of. We don’t have purview of
personnel matters.

Ms. Ortolano Well that’s ok because what you do have purview of is performance issues? How do we
address performance? And that to me is reasonable. And | am addressing something that was
addressed by the Mayor at both Ward meeting; the demoralizing nature of this report. | am going to
submit to you tonight for the record, which you all received e-mails, the four reports that | gave you. I’d
like them to go in the minutes. They will be available for the public to see and read for themselves. | am
also concerned by the minimizing | think of the issue by the Mayor. And what | mean by that is | listen to
the comments at the Ward 7 Meeting where he mentioned that the investigation was only 2 weeks, that
there were only 2 data points above an hour that he was out.

Board of Aldermen 05-28-2019 Page 16

| don’t Know the content of what he was referring to, but it was a month-long investigation and you know
| don’t want to debate what it was, | want the report to speak to itself. All | have done with this report is
give 50 copies out to business leaders and members of the community and shared it through e-mail,
without a cover letter. There is nothing to discuss on it. Read it for what it is and that’s it. Let it stand
on its own.

Regarding your issue Ms. Wilshire on personnel, | received an e-mail from Ben Clemons that was very
pointed that what | provided was very incomplete for the accusations | made. Please get the expense
reports, please get the logs, please bring forward the data, show us that what you are talking about is
real. Ok? | didn’t know what to make of that. | mean is that something | am supposed to prove?
Because that’s what | brought tonight; | brought the data that Ben Clemons said “show us, substantiate
what you are doing”. And | think if an Alderman is telling me | need to substantiate, | came here to
substantiate. So | am not certain if you are telling me | can’t, | shouldn’t or | am out of line?

President Wilshire

What | am telling you Ms. Ortolano is this Board does not deal with personnel matters for City
employees.

Ms. Ortolano Well I’m not asking you to deal with it and | am not asking you to reprimand, but | am
asking you to listen.

President Wilshire

We have been listening week after week and we just keep hearing the same thing from you about this
employee. We don’t deal with employee issues in the City, we are not the employer board.

Ms. Ortolano | don’t think you’ve dealt with this week after week with me, the report came out 2 weeks
ago. Really, | didn’t say much about this particular employee. And | addressed any concerns | had with
your administration and Ms. Kleiner. | didn’t come here specifically, the only time | addressed this
individual was on the anti-nepotism policy. Right? | challenge you to find the minutes where I’ve been
in here talking endlessly about this individual. | don’t believe | have.

Ben, you raised the issue regarding Expense Reports. And the interesting issue on Expense Reports is
back in October, | went to Finance and | pulled Expense Reports from 2014 up on Assessors. This is
Assessor became a Commercial Assessor 3 years ago so he took on a different role. So the assessor
he replaced, Commercial Assessor, | pulled his Expense Reports, and looked as his travel mileage
which Commercial Assessors typically travel very low mileage relative to residential because permits,
and properties ...

Alderman Dowd

Can | have a ruling from the Corporation Counsel as to whether this is something the purview over or
should it go to the HR Department and City Hall.

Attorney Bolton

This is General Public Comment, you’ve opened it up to speak on any topic.

Ms. Ortolano | share all this information today, | had an hour long meeting with the Union Leader and an
hour long meeting with the Telegraph. They were both interested in writing reports. And issuing a story
on these issues. So! am sharing it with you because | shared it externally as well. And because | was
asked by an Alderman about this. And | do think it’s relevant and you’d want to hear. | want you to know
| did do my homework. | went and gathered these reports that were commercial assessors. And when |
looked at the Commercial Assessor who left, the mileage travel is very low, 20, 40, 50 miles a month.