Search

Old Nashua (Riverside) Landfill:
Groundwater Management Wells-Standard Purge Technique (pH, SC, Temp.)

RFP 0931-041321- Chemserve - submitted 4/13/2021

October 2022
As, Ba,
Cd, 1,4- VOC's 8260
Cr,Pb,Hg, | Dioxane |NHDES Full PFAS
Monitoring Location Filter Chloride Nitrate TKN Iron Mianganesq Metal Prep.| Se, Ag Low Level List (Isotope Dil)
MW-3R 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
MW-4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
MWw-5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
MW-6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
# of Samples 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 0 0 0 0
$15.00 $8.25 $8.25 $19.00 $7.43 $7.43 $25.00 $50.00 $45.00 $50.00 $250.00
$60.00 $33.00 $33.00 $76.00 $29.72 $29.72 $100.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Roussel Park Landfill:
Groundwater Management Wells-Low Flow Technique (DO,SC,pH, Temp., ORP, Turb)
October 2022
As, Ba, Cd, 1,4- VOC's 8260
Cr,Pb,Hg, Dioxane DES FULL PFAS
Monitoring Location Filter Nitrate Arsenic TKN Chloride Iron |Manganese|Metal Prep. Se, Ag Low Level LIST (Isotope Dil)
MW-1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
MW-2 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
MW-3 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
MW-4 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
MW-6 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
# of Samples 1 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 0 0 0 0
$15.00 $8.25 $0.00 $19.00 $8.25 $7.43 $7.43 $25.00 $50.00 $45.00 $50.00 $250.00
$15.00 $41.25 $0.00 $95.00 $41.25 $37.15 $37.15 $125.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00

$361.44

$391.80

Total FYE June 2023

$43,144

RFP 0931-041321- Chemserve - submitted 4/13/2021

FYE June 2024

Sampling costs :

October Sampling: Lincoln Park, Old Nashua, Roussell
November Sampling: Four Hills, Shady Lane

February Sampling: MW-111S Only

June Sampling Four Hills Leachate, MW-111S
July Sampling: Four Hills Leachate, MW-111S
April Sampling: Four Hills

Analysis costs:

Nashua Four Hill Landfill: Low Flow Technique (DO,SC,pH, Temp., ORP, Turb)

$2,400.00

$4,800.00

$400.00

$1,400.00

$1,400.00

$4,800.00

Nov 2023
1,4- VOC's 8260
Dioxane | DES FULL PFAS
Monitoring Location Filter Nitrate Sulfate TKN Chloride Iron |Manganese|Metal Prep.| Low Level LIST (Isotope Dil)
M-1S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
M-1R 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
M-2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
M-5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
M-7R 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
M-8D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
M-8S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
M-9D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
M-9S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
M-9R 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
M-10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
M-11S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
M-11M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
M-11R 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
M-12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
Tbrook UP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
Tbrook Down 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0
# of Samples 11 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 10
$15.00 $8.25 $8.25 $19.00 $8.25 $7.43 $7.43 $25.00 $45.00 $50.00 $250.00
$165.00 $140.25 | $140.25 | $323.00 | $140.25 | $126.31] $126.31 $425.00 $765.00 $850.00 $2,500.00

$5,701.37

RFP 0931-041321- Chemserve - submitted 4/13/2021

November 2023

Monitoring Location

Filter

Nitrate

Sulfate

4
A
Z

Chloride

lron

Manganese

Sodium

Metal Prep

w
O
oO

QO
Oo
O

1,4- Dioxane
Low Level

VOC's NH
Full List

PFAS
(Isotope Dil)

MW-101S
MW-101R
MW102S
MW-102R
MW-103S
MW-103R
MW-104S
MW-104R
MW-105S
MW-105R
MW-106S
MW-106R
MW107R
MW108R
MW-109S
MW-109R
MW-110S
MW-110R
MW-111S
MW-111R

1

1

1

1

SBe(ogoo = = |= |= |= om em eo eo eo Sm em OS oS or

1

SBe(ogoo = = |= |= |= om em eo eo eo Sm em OS oS or

SBeogo0o -- = = |= |= | em em oS em So em em eS So or

1

SBe(ogoo = = |= |= |= om em eo eo eo Sm em OS oS or

=

SBe(ogoo = = |= |= |= om em eo eo eo Sm em OS oS or

1

SBe(ogoo = = |= |= |= om em eo eo eo Sm em OS oS or

SBeogo0o -- = = |= |= | em em oS em So em em eS So or

1

SBe(ogoo = = |= |= |= om em eo eo eo Sm em OS oS or

SBeogo0o -- = = |= |= | em em oS em So em em eS So or

SBeogo0o -- = = |= |= | em em oS em So em em eS So or

=

SBe(ogoo = = |= |= |= om em eo eo eo Sm em OS oS or

SBeogo0o -- = = |= |= | em em oS em So em em eS So or

1

pe oo fe Hoof Hoof HoAeoo oO =

# of Samples

8

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

10

$15.00

$8.25

$8.25

$19.00

$8.25

$7.43

$7.43

$7.43

$25.00

$16.50

$24.75

$45.00

$50.00

$250.00

$120.00

$148.50

$148.50

$342.00

$148.50

$133.74

$133.74

$133.74

$450.00

$297.00

$445.50

$810.00

$900.00

$2,500.00

November 2023, April 2024, June 2024

Landfill Leachate

Sulfate

Chloride

lron

Mlanganes

Sodium

As, Ba, Cd,
Cr,Pb,Hg,
Se, Ag, Sb,
Be, Ni, TI

metal prep

1,4- Dioxane
Low Level

VOC's
8260
NHDES
Full List

Primary Nov21
Secoundary Nov21

1

1

1

1

1

1

1

Primary Apr22
Secondary Apr22

Primary Jun22
Secoundary Jun22

= af o oa] eo

= af o oa] eo

= af o oa] eo

= afeo ajo oS

# of Samples

o;-] =] =]

o;-] =] =]

o;-] =] =]

o;-] =] =]

ofa aja ala A/O

o;-] =] =]

ola aja a/a 3/0

6

6

6

6

$8.25

$8.25

$7.43

$7.43

$16.50

$7.43

$24.75

$50.00

$25.00

$45.00

$50.00

$49.50

$49.50

$44.58

$44.58

$99.00

$44.58

$148.50

$300.00

$150.00

$270.00

$300.00

$6,711.22

$1,500.24

Other Groundwater Samples Samples

Nov 2023 and Apr 2024

RFP 0931-041321- Chemserve - submitted 4/13/2021

Monitoring Location |Static Elevation
B-2 2
B-3R 0
B-4 2
B-10R 2
B-13T 2
MW-110S 0
MVW-110R 0
# of Samples 8
July 2023 Feb 2024
1,4- Dioxane | VOC's NH PFAS
Monitoring Location Filter Nitrate Sulfate TKN Chloride Iron |Manganese| Sodium | Metal Prep BOD COD Low Level Full List | (Isotope Dil)
MW-111S 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 2 2
# of Samples 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 0 2 0 0 2 2 2
$15.00 $8.25 $8.25 $19.00 $8.25 $7.43 $7.43 $7.43 $25.00 $16.50 $24.75 $45.00 $50.00 $250.00
$30.00 $16.50 $16.50 $38.00 $16.50 $14.86 $14.86 $0.00 $50.00 $0.00 $0.00 $90.00 $100.00 $500.00
April 2024
As, Ba, Cd,
1,4- VOC's 8260 Cr,Pb,Hg,
Dioxane | DES FULL PFAS Se, Ag, Sb,
Monitoring Location Filter Nitrate Sulfate TKN Chloride Iron |Manganese|Metal Prep.| Low Level LIST (Isotope Dil) | Be, Ni, TI
M-1S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
M-1R 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
M-2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
M-5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
M-7R 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
M-8D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
M-8S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
M-9D 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
M-9S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
M-9R 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
M-10 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
M-11S 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
M-11M 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
M-11R 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
M-12 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
Tbrook UP 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
Tbrook Down 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 1
# of Samples 11 17 17 17 17 17 17 17 0 0 0 17
$15.00 $8.25 $8.25 $19.00 $8.25 $7.43 $7.43 $25.00 $45.00 $50.00 $250.00 $50.00
$165.00 $140.25 | $140.25 | $323.00 | $140.25 | $126.31] $126.31 $425.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $850.00

$887.22

$2,436.37

Board of Aldermen Page 5
July 12, 2016

are also very excited. That e-mail went to the Mayor and the President of the Chamber of Commerce. It
is very exciting for me to see the community engaged in government at the local level.

Chief Steven Galipeau, Nashua Fire Rescue

| am here to speak in favor of R-16-040, the bond for the Spit Brook Road addition. This project has
been around since 2007 or 2008. It’s received the A-1 approval from Capital Improvements for the last
few years and been supported by the Budget Review Committee. It provides the City of Nashua with an
increase in operational opportunities that we don’t currently have today. It will also provide a safer and
healthier work environment for our firefighters with regard to proper protective clothing storage and
cleaning and equipment repair. The south end of the city has grown immensely and | thank you for your
support.

Master Nikhill Vootkur, 5 Jonquil Lane
The following is an e-mail from R Krishner from Mysore:

A very good morning from R. Krishner from Mysore. | am writing this letter on behalf of the Mysore
Chamber of Commerce and industry and also on behalf of the City of Mysore.

It is indeed a great pleasure and privilege for the City of Mysore to be associated with such a beautiful
place like Nashua for the sister city relationship. We had already had preliminary discussions with the
local authorities including the Mayor of Mysore and are all excited to take this further as early as
possible. Our special thanks go to Mrs. Latha Mangipudi and the Nashua Chamber of Commerce for
their active involvedness in this excellent project. We eagerly look forward to hearing from you on a
positive note. We highly convey warm greetings and our appreciation to all leaders of Nashua for
supporting this noble cause.

Mr. Jag Vootkur, 5 Jonquil Lane

| am just here to support R-16-049, a sister city between Mysore and Nashua. | think it will be very
beneficial to both of the cities.

Mr. Paggan Chandra, 32 Cushing Avenue

| had been in Mysore for almost 20 years and it’s a beautiful city. | hope the sister relationship between
the cities will help both of the cities.

Ms. Sumatka Chadhee, Nashua, NH

| am here to support the sister city initiative between Nashua and Mysore. I’ve been a proud resident of
Nashua for about 26 years. My young family and | moved here 26 years ago because it was named the
best place to live in America twice. | am very excited about this. | think Mysore is a great match for
Nashua; it’s a vibrant city with many beautiful palaces. Nashua has a large Indian community who work
here and raise their families here. They contribute to the economy and are also involved culturally.
There are also charities organized and run by the Indian community. Bangalore and San Francisco have
been sister cities for many years. Boston | think has over ten cities so | think this will be great.

PETITIONS — None

Unidentified Speaker

Is there a better time of the day maybe to meet for State reps?

Representative MacKay

A couple things. One, | was remiss in stating that | represent Ward 3. | wanted to clear that up. | have a couple of
questions. What are the City of Nashua’s biggest issues that they would like we, as the State delegation, to
understand? How do we come together with the Aldermen and the delegation when there is an issue? There’s
legislation right now, | think it’s HB 92, and that has to do with the building codes and updating them to the 2015.
And | know Bill McKinney, Nashua’s building inspector, is very concerned about that, and as we all should be.
We need to update our codes. When is a good time to be able to have meetings so that we can bring together
the Aldermen and the State delegation to have a conversation, so when we go up there we can stand united and
say this is a city issue and we need to bring it forward as a city issue? | would like to be able to help in that
cause. So that’s just for me. As for day and time, maybe the holiday had an effect on this particular meeting.
Sometimes it’s easier in the morning. I’ve seen more people get together in the morning around breakfast time.
But again, | think as the weather gets nicer, it’s easier later, but | still think that earlier is sometimes better.

President McCarthy

I’ll address a couple of things you said. With regard to things like the bill on building codes, we’ve had a lot of
discussion about what the role of the Board of Aldermen should be in State legislation. And in fact, on most of
the things that deal with departments, we actually trust those opinions to our professionals. | would encourage
the delegation to meet with the building code officials. In fact, we have the same issue with the city clerk’s office
often. We have the same issue with the assessor's office, because there are lots of bills that come up every term
that are highly technical. For the most part, we would rather have the staff give you expert opinions than us give
you our opinions. It’s the policy bills that we’re concerned with. From that perspective, it’s mostly about the
money. If | go back and look at where we are now versus where we were 20-30 years ago, we were originally
promised $20 million in a grant to build the CTE program at the high schools; we never saw a nickel of it. We
were promised 30% reimbursement on the principle of the bonds to build the two high schools; we might have
seen 15% some years, often we saw nothing. The downshifted costs and the things where we made a decision
based on what the funding was going to be and it then dried up have shifted a tremendous burden on to the city.
The retirement system, as we talked about, there is probably $30 million plus today that wouldn’t have been
there had things stayed the same as they were when we made those decisions. We're pretty good at working
around that and not blowing the tax rate, while paying for that ever-growing burden. But those are the things, |
think, that affect us the most.

The other one, as was mentioned, is rail. It would be great to get help from the State, but under the current
circumstance of us having a Memorandum of Understanding with the Boston Service Rail Transit, | guess |
would ask that the State not get in the way of a solution we found on our own. And | am very concerned that
could happen.

Representative MacKay

| hope that does not happen. | concur. We absolutely need to have rail.

President McCarthy

We found a solution that may not be optimal but it is better than every other one in that it may come to fruition.
The guys that are looking at it are doing Worcester to Providence now, they’re looking at Bedford to Lowell for
us, and then they’re going to look at Lowell down to Worcester eventually, which will give us some very good
access to places we don’t currently have access to. I’m happy about that. My concern is that if the Rail Transit
Authority, as it is, gets in the middle of that and makes decisions that it thinks are for the greater good that mess
up that arrangement, I’d be very disappointed with that having been the final outcome of the work we’ve done.

RFP 0931-041321- Chemserve - submitted 4/13/2021

April 2024

Monitoring Location

Filter

Nitrate

Sulfate

4
A
Z

Chloride

lron

Manganese

Sodium

Metal Prep

w
O
oO

QO
Oo
O

1,4- Dioxane
Low Level

VOC's NH
Full List

PFAS
(Isotope Dil)

As, Ba,
Cd,
Cr,Pb,Hg,
Se, Ag,
Sb, Be, Ni,
Tl

MW-101S
MW-101R
MW102S
MW-102R
MW-103S
MW-103R
MW-104S
MW-104R
MW-105S
MW-105R
MW-106S
MW-106R
MW107R
MW108R
MW-109S
MW-109R
MW-110S
MW-110R
MW-111S
MW-111R

1

1

1

1

SBe(ogoo a |= |= |= |= eo em eo eo So So So em oe or

1

SBe(ogoo a |= |= |= |= eo em eo eo So So So em oe or

SBeogo ja = |= |= |= |= em em eo eo So So em eS So or

1

SBe(ogoo a |= |= |= |= eo em eo eo So So So em oe or

=

SBe(ogoo a |= |= |= |= eo em eo eo So So So em oe or

1

SBe(ogoo a |= |= |= |= eo em eo eo So So So em oe or

SBeogo ja = |= |= |= |= em em eo eo So So em eS So or

1

SBe(ogoo a |= |= |= |= eo em eo eo So So So em oe or

SBeogo ja = |= |= |= |= em em eo eo So So em eS So or

SBeogo ja = |= |= |= |= em em eo eo So So em eS So or

=

SBe(ogoo a |= |= |= |= eo em eo eo So So So em oe or

SBeogo ja = |= |= |= |= em em eo eo So So em eS So or

0

oooooooocoooocoo°oo°oo°o°o eo

# of Samples

8

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

18

0

=
ojr~roorse se se eee eee see eee

Storm Water testing
5 locations quarterly
3 locations annually

$15.00

$8.25

$8.25

$19.00

$8.25

$7.43

$7.43

$7.43

$25.00

$16.50

$24.75

$45.00

$50.00

$250.00

$50

$120.00

$148.50

$148.50

$342.00

$148.50

$133.74

$133.74

$133.74

$450.00

$297.00

$445.50

$810.00

$900.00

$0.00

$900.00

$5,111.22]

5 outfall locations

TSS

lron

Metal Prep

BOD

Ammonia

SVOA

Zinc

20

20

20

3

3

$9.75

$7.43

$16.25

$24.75

$18.00

$160.00

$7.43

$5.00

$195.00

$148.60

$325.00

$74.25

$54.00

$480.00

$22.29

$15.00

$1,314.14

Shady Lane Landfill:

Groundwater Management Wells-Standard Purge Protocol (pH, SC, Temp.)

RFP 0931-041321- Chemserve - submitted 4/13/2021

November 2023
AS, Ba,
PFAS Cd, 1,4-
(Isotope | Cr,Pb,Hg, VOC's Dioxane
Monitoring Location Filter Chloride COD Iron |ManganeseMetal Prep Dil) Se, Ag 8260 Low Level
M-1B 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
M-3 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
M-4 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
LS5 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
LS6 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
SWU 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
SWD 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
# of Samples 7 7 7 7 7 7 0 0 0 0
$15.00 $8.25 $16.50 $7.43 $7.43 $25.00 $250.00 $50.00 $50.00 $45.00
$105.00 $57.75 $115.50 | $52.01 $52.01 | $175.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Lincoln Park:
Groundwater Management Wells-Standard Purge Protocol (pH, SC, Temp.)
October 2023
As, Ba, Cd, 1,4- VOC's 8260
Cr,Pb,Hg, Dioxane | NHDES Full PFAS
Monitoring Location Filter Chloride Nitrate TKN Iron Arsenic |Manganese|Metal Prep.| Se, Ag Low Level List (Isotope Dil)
MW-1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
MWw-2 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
MW-3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
MW-4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
MWw-5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
MW-6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 0 0
# of Samples| 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 6 0 0 0 0
$15.00 $8.25 $8.25 $19.00 $7.43 $7.43 $7.43 $25.00 $50.00 $45.00 $50.00 $250.00
$90.00 $49.50 $49.50 | $114.00 $44.58 $44.58 $44.58 $150.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00 $0.00
Old Nashua (Riverside) Landfill:
Groundwater Management Wells-Standard Purge Technique (pH, SC, Temp.)
October 2023
Monitoring Location
As, Ba,
Cd, 1,4- VOC's 8260
Cr,Pb,Hg, | Dioxane |NHDES Full PFAS
Filter Chloride Nitrate TKN Iron Mianganesq Metal Prep.| Se, Ag Low Level List (Isotope Dil)
MW-3R 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
MW-4 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
MWw-5 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
MW-6 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
# of Samples| 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
$15.00 $8.25 $8.25 $19.00 $7.43 $7.43 $25.00 $50.00 $45.00 $50.00 $250.00
$60.00 $33.00 $33.00 $76.00 $29.72 $29.72 $100.00 $200.00 $180.00 $200.00 $1,000.00

$557.27

$586.74

$1,941.44

Roussel Park Landfill:

Groundwater Management Wells-Low Flow Technique (DO,SC,pH, Temp., ORP, Turb)

RFP 0931-041321- Chemserve - submitted 4/13/2021

October 2023
As, Ba, Cd, 1,4- VOC's 8260
Cr,Pb,Hg, Dioxane DES FULL PFAS
Monitoring Location Filter Nitrate Arsenic TKN Chloride Iron |Manganese|Metal Prep. Se, Ag Low Level LIST (Isotope Dil)
MW-1 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
MW-2 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
MW-3 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
MW-4 1 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
MW-6 0 1 0 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
# of Samples 1 5 0 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
$15.00 $8.25 $0.00 $19.00 $8.25 $7.43 $7.43 $25.00 $50.00 $45.00 $50.00 $250.00
$15.00 $41.25 $0.00 $95.00 $41.25 $37.15 $37.15 $125.00 $250.00 $225.00 $250.00 $1,250.00

$2,366.80

Total FYE June 2024

$44,314

{Total 3 year contract

$129,797]

Adumnistrative Services
Pwzehasing De partes st

(@22)\ THE CITY OF NASHUA “The Gate City”

Addendum 1

RFP 0931-041321
Waiter Testing

April 2, 2021
Information included in this document becomes a part of the original RFP.

lf you are submitting a paper bid, please sign below to indicate receipt of this additional information and
include this page with your bid submittal. If you are submitting a proposal via Bid Express please be sure to
acknowledge the addendum on the website before submitting your proposal.

Addendum 1 is being issued to modify the bidding documents to change the deadline for Vendor
Question Answers Posted to Monday, April 5, 2021, at 4:00pm.

All other aspects of the original document remain the same.

Please sign and return this page with your submitted proposal. Failure to acknowledge the addendum will
result in the bid submittal being disqualified.

| acknowledge that Addendum 1 has been received and incorporated into bid submittal for RFP

ae

0931-041321. AY /
Authorized Signature” J, J .
LMMOUY

eget

Name of Firm

229 Main Street » Nashua, New Hampshire 03061 « Phone (603) 589-3330 « Fax (603) 589-3233 |