FY 2022
CAPITAL
IMPROVEMENTS
PROGRAM
LONG-TERM & SHORT-TERM
PROGRAMS & PROJECTS
SIX-YEAR PLAN OF
REQUESTED PROJECTS
CITY OF NASHUA
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
NASHUA, NEW HAMPSHIRE
February 18, 2021
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS COMMITTEE MEMBERS
FISCAL YEAR 2022: CITY OF NASHUA, NEW HAMPSHIRE
Name / Affiliation
Scott LeClair
Nashua City Planning Board
And Citizen Representative
Charles Budris
Citizen Representative
Matt Sullivan
Planning Manager
Nashua City Planning Department
City Charter Member (City Employee)
Bob Canaway
Citizen Representative
Laurence C. Szetela, CPA
Citizen Representative
David Fredette
City Treasurer
City Charter Member (City Employee)
John Griffin
City Comptroller
City Charter Member (City Employee)
David Tencza
Alderman
Jan Schmidt
Alderwoman
CIC Role
Chair, CIC
Vice-Chair, CIC
Secretary, CIC
Aldermanic Representative
Aldermanic Alternate
Planning Department Staff
Matt Sullivan
Planning Manager
City Employee
Marcia Wilkins
Planner |
City Employee
THE FUNCTION OF THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS COMMITTEE
The Capital Improvements Committee (CIC) is a subcommittee of the Nashua City Planning
Board (NCPB). The CIC is an appointed committee, with its composition as follows: four (4)
citizens appointed by the NCPB, the City Treasurer, the City Comptroller, the City Planning
Director, and a liaison of the Board of Aldermen. Historically, one of the citizen members is a
NCPB member. In an annual cycle that begins in late summer and is completed in late spring,
the CIC receives, evaluates, and makes recommendations on capital improvement projects
requested by each municipal department. The CIC's function as an appointed body is advisory in
that it makes recommendations to the NCPB, and then to the Mayor, and Board of Aldermen on
priorities for funding requested capital improvement projects.
lThe CIC process is as follows;|
A. Late summer: Letters are sent out to Division/Department Heads requesting their detailed
CIP project submittal information for the next fiscal year, in addition to a listing of projects
within a six-year time frame. Each year, Division/Department Heads reassess all of their
prior project requests and add a new sixth year.
B. Fall through early winter: The CIC reviews all project requests, conducts site visits to
locations of proposed projects, and schedules public meetings for Division/Department
Heads to present their project requests for the next fiscal year.
C. Beginning of calendar year: After all requests have been heard, the CIC meets to
prioritize all requested projects.
D. Late winter: The CIC makes its recommendations to the Nashua City Planning Board
(NCPB), and then to the Mayor, and the Board of Aldermen.
E. 30 days of receipt of the CIC's recommendations: The NCPB may attach its own
amendments to the CIC's recommendations to the Mayor and Board of Aldermen, but such
amendments shall be in the form of supplementary recommendations or comments attached
to the proposed CIP Budget.
F. Early spring: The Mayor reviews all recommendations regarding the CIP, together with the
rest of the City's budget requests, and makes recommendations for funding to the Board of
Aldermen.
G. Through the spring: The Budget Committee hearings are held for the proposed CIP
Budget and for City Division/Department budget requests.
H. At_start_of Budget Committee hearings: The CIC makes its presentation to the
Aldermanic Budget Committee regarding its recommendations for project funding and the
relative priorities assigned to each, including rationale and justification for those
recommendations.
l. By the end of Spring: The Aldermanic Budget Committee makes its recommendations to
the full Board of Aldermen; a public hearing is held, and by the end of the fiscal year (June
30) the Board of Aldermen adopts the final City Budget.
3
IDEFINITION OF A CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT
A capital improvement will be any single project requiring expenditure by the City of $50,000 or
more, and which falls into one of the categories listed below. Projects under $50,000 will only be
considered by the CIC if there are exceptional circumstances.
1. The purchase, construction, replacement or rehabilitation of any physical facility for the
community with an anticipated life in excess of ten (10) years*
2. The purchase of equipment for any physical facility when first erected or acquired;
3. Significant equipment purchases. *
4. The acquisition of property of a permanent nature;
5. The acquisition of land or interests in land;
6. The construction, reconstruction, or major improvement of public facilities such as highways
and sewerage lines;
7. Any other expenditure which increases the physical assets of the community;
8. Surveys or studies relative to the aforementioned items or of significant value to the
Community; and
9. The purchase of wheeled vehicles or motorized equipment having an anticipated life of over
twelve (12) years, and which are not included in the City's Capital Equipment Reserve Fund.
IDEFINITION OF PRIORITY CATEGORIES;|
In order to evaluate each proposed capital improvement project with other projects for the same
department, and with projects from other departments, the Committee utilizes the following
priority categories:
A Rating. Essential (highest priority) - Projects which are required to complete or renovate a
major public improvement; projects which will remedy a condition dangerous to the health,
safety, and welfare of the public; or projects which will provide facilities for a critically needed
community program.
B Rating. Desirable (second priority) - Projects which will benefit the community; whose validity
of planning and timing have been established.
C Rating. Acceptable (third priority) - Projects which are adequately planned, but which can be
postponed if budget reductions are necessary.
D Rating. Deferrable (fourth priority) - Projects which are definitely recommended for
postponement or elimination from the capital improvements program since they pose
serious questions of adequate planning, proper timing, or community need.
E Rating. Other - Those projects presented as capital improvement projects by various
departments but which in the CIC's opinion do not meet the definition of a capital
improvement project as such or which are more appropriately funded in another manner,
Non-prioritized.
* Amended by the CIC February 15, 1994 for the FY 96' process.
4
*e
INCEPTION “e
Inception Technologies Inc.
77 Sundial Ave Suite 403W ote
Manchester, NH 03103
Date
United States
Expiration
T: 877-475-2580 Date
Contact
Prepared for City of Nashua, NH
Kimberly Kleiner
229 Main Street
Quote
1385 v3
February 23, 2022
March 18, 2022
Raymond Feoli
Nashua, NH 03060
United States ACCEPT QUOTE
T: 603.589.3025
E: kleinerk@nashuanh.gov
103 Box Scanning Proposal
One-Time Fees
Category Item Qty Price Total
Product Document Preparation 475 $22.75 $10,806.25'
Inception Technologies Document Preparation Services Hourly Rate
Product Paper Scanning Auto Color Detection 360000 $0.033 $11,880.00
Inception Technologies Document Scanning Services using Auto Color
Detection for superior image quality
Product Indexing Services 700000 $0.01 $7,000.00+
Inception Technologies Document Indexing Services for tagging/naming
files - per keystroke charge
One-Time Subtotal $29,686.25
Additional DocuWare Storage
One-Time Fees
Category Item Qty Price Total
Product DocuWare Cloud 15 Additional Storage 10 GB 12 $14.00 $168.00
Monthly Rate for an additional 10 GB of Storage for DocuWare Cloud 15
Product DocuWare Cloud 15 Additional Storage 10 GB 12 $14.00 $168.00
Monthly Rate for an additional 10 GB of Storage for DocuWare Cloud 15
Product DocuWare Cloud 15 Additional Storage 10 GB 12 $14.00 $168.00
Monthly Rate for an additional 10 GB of Storage for DocuWare Cloud 15
Inception Technologies Inc. - Quote # 1385 v3
7/10
ICHARTER AND RELATED LAWS, NASHUA REVISED ORDINANCES
§ 77-a. Capital Improvements Committee
(a)
Establishment and purpose.
There is hereby established, as a subcommittee of the City Planning Board, Capital
Improvements Committee with the responsibility of preparing a_ six-year Capital
Improvement Program and a one-year capital improvement budget for the consideration of
the mayor and Board of Aldermen. It is also the responsibility of the committee to annually
review the progress of approved capital improvement projects and annually update and
revise its six-year program and one-year budget.
Requests for capital improvement projects.
All requests for capital improvement projects, as defined by the committee, shall be referred
to the committee for a recommendation prior to any formal commitment by the city to
proceed. All departments shall supply the necessary information required by the committee
to properly conduct their review.
Membership and term of office.
(1) The committee shall consist of four citizen members appointed by the City Planning
Board, the City Treasurer, the City Comptroller, the City Planning Director and a
member of the Board of Aldermen appointed by it.
(2) Terms of office shall, for ex-officio members, coincide with their terms of office and, for
citizen members, be for a two-year term with two of the four terms ending in alternate
years.
Responsibilities. The committee shall have the following responsibilities:
(1) To receive, evaluate and make recommendations on capital improvement projects
requested by each municipal department. To the extent feasible, the review of each
project shall be premised upon the master plan for the city of Nashua or parts thereof,
as amended from time to time:
(2) The committee shall recommend to the City Planning Board those capital improvement
projects, which should be considered in the ensuing six-year period, and those which
should be deferred beyond;
(3) The committee shall also recommend to the City Planning Board those capital
improvement projects which should be considered in the coming year's fiscal budget for
the city;
(4) The committee shall also include in its report to the City Planning Board the financial
effects of the proposed capital improvements program;
ICHARTER AND RELATED LAWS, NASHUA REVISED ORDINANCES...continued..|
(5) The committee shall also review the progress of all approved capital improvement
projects and issue a status report semi-annually to the City Planning Board, Mayor and
Board of Aldermen:
(6) The committee, upon submission to it by the Mayor and Board of Aldermen shall review
and report on any capital improvement request received by the Mayor and/or the Board
of Aldermen for inclusion within the one-year capital improvements budget which has
not previously been reviewed by the committee. The committee shall submit its report
on the proposed capital improvement to the City Planning Board within 30 days of its
referral to the committee from the Mayor and/or Board of Aldermen. The City Planning
Board shall submit the committee's report and any additional comments of the Planning
Board to the Mayor and Board of Aldermen within 30 days of receipt of the committee's
report.
The City Planning Board, upon receiving the committee's recommended capital improvements
program and budget, may amend the program and budget before its submission to the Mayor and
the Board of Aldermen, but such amendments shall be in the form of supplementary
recommendation or comments attached to the submitted program and/or budget.
(Nov. 4, 1975, Referendum, Proposal No. 2; amended Res.R-83-223, effective Jan. 1, 1984)
C: Charter.CIP
10.
IREQUIRED BOND AUTHORIZATION PROCESS|
Project conception by the originating division.
Estimated project cost by the originating division.
Presentations to the Capital Improvements Committee per Section 77-a of the City
Charter, (if applicable).
Go through the Budget process (if applicable).
Consult with the Treasurer to determine if and how the specific project aligns with previously
authorized projects, the availability of funds for the project, and if the project meets the city's
annual bonding plan previously worked out, arrange a review with the financial advisors and
bond counsel. In addition:
a. Tentative start-up date.
b. Estimated project length.
c. Estimated cash flow projection.
Request bonding authorization from the Board of Aldermen with required public hearing.
Resolution to be prepared by the Financial Services Department and reviewed by
Corporation Counsel.
After authorization is obtained from the Mayor and Board of Aldermen a certified copy of the
resolution is sent to the Bond Counsel. Legal requirements are determined by Bond Counsel
allowing the Treasurer to begin the bond or Bond Anticipation Note process.
Notify the Treasurer of the desired start-up date and provide a confirmed cash flow
projection from the project's architect.
Project start-up will be subject to the bond anticipation note borrowing schedule restrictions
and limitations determined by the Tax Reform Act of 1986, the project having met the legal
requirements as outlined in the Tax Reform act of 1986 and determined by Bond Counsel.
Funds may not be available for project start-up if the above steps and requirements are not
followed.
C: BondAuth.Pro
FY 2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
CITY OF NASHUA, NEW HAMPSHIRE
GRAND TOTALS: SUMMARY PAGE
GRAND TOTALS: SUMMARY PAGE DEPARTMENT
REQUESTED
"A" = ESSENTIAL
Long-term programs $ 8,600,000
Recommended bond considerations
Short-term projects
Recommended cash considerations $ 8,337,711
And capital reserve fund
TOTAL "A"s $ 15,927,711
"B" = DESIRABLE
Long-term programs $ 3,590,000
Short-term projects $ 3,860,168
TOTAL"B"s $ 7,450,168
"C" = ACCEPTABLE
Long-term programs $0
Short-term projects $ 13,281,132
TOTAL "C"s $ 13,281,132
"D" = DEFERABLE
Long-term programs $0
Short-term projects $ 180,000
TOTAL "D"s $0
“Q” = OTHER $0
GRAND TOTALS =A+B+C+D+0
Long-term programs $ 12,190,000
Short-term projects $ 25,659,011
TOTAL: $ 37,849,011
Solid Waste Enterprise Fund projects $ 950,000
Waste Water Enterprise Fund projects $ 12,138,039
TOTAL: $ 13,088,039
“Enterprise Fund totals are for the City share of the projects.
8
FY 2022 CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS
CITY OF NASHUA, NEW HAMPSHIRE
LONG-TERM PROGRAMS
"A"
LONG-TERM PROGRAMS: Programs/Projects that will span more than one year from beginning to end, and that probably will
be bonded, over a period of years. These programs may be proposed in a phased approach with architectural and engineering work, for
example, being a first phase followed by construction in later phase(s). These programs may be in the seven-digit, million-dollar range.
A = Essential (highest priority): Programs/Projects which are required to complete or renovate a major public improvement,
projects which will remedy a condition dangerous to the health, safety, and welfare of the public, or projects which will provide facilities
for critically needed community programs.
PRIORITY DEPARTMENTS PROJECTS DEPARTMENT C.1.C
REQUESTED RECOMMENDS
A-1 Division of
Public Works Annual Street Paving
(Engineering) $ 7,500,000 $ 7,500,000
In FY 17, the City provided legislation to bond $7.5 million annually for a period of five years to fund the first half of
the proposed ten-year Street Paving Program. This is the fifth year of that program. The Street Paving Program is
critical to keeping City streets safe and functional. The objective of the program is to repair failing streets, maintain
good streets to extend their service life, and do so using a cost effective approach that works within the provided
budget. Street selection will be based on a Pavement Condition Index using pavement management software.
Division of Annual Roadside Safety
A-1 Public Works Improvements
(Engineering) $ 50,000 $ 50,000
Throughout the City, there are several roadside hazards that should be corrected by guardrails or other features.
Protection is needed at many locations including on Gilson Rd, East Dunstable Rd, Ridge Rd, Tinker Rd, and at
culvert locations where the headwalls are too close to the edge of the road. Some of these improvements can also
add a traffic calming effect that improves safety.
Division of Infrastructure Improvements
A-2 Public Works Citywide
(Street Department) $ 500,000 $ 500,000
Citywide Infrastructure improvements to include sidewalk installation, and curbing replacement and repairs.
Installation of new and/or replacement of existing crosswalks. Replacement of existing drainage or sewer
infrastructure. This request is to facilitate the repair and or replacement of the City’s failing infrastructure with new
sidewalks, drainage and sewer as needed. Design work will be performed by the City Engineering Department and
to the extent feasible the projects will be performed through the Street Department’s operations. Utilizing the Street
Department’s work force and equipment will reduce the overall cost of the work.
