Skip to main content

Main navigation

  • Documents
  • Search

User account menu

  • Log in
Home
Nashua City Data

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search

Search

Displaying 35831 - 35840 of 38765

Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P23

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
23
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_m__121620…

Special Board of Aldermen Public Hearing — 12/16/2019 Page 23

One of the things that we haven’t talked about tonight, | don’t think it was in the FAQ’s either is State aid. State
aid disappeared at some point after the high school project was completed. It has started to creep back up, |
am not aware of what is going on with that, but | know that they have solicited input from the school districts for
any projects that are planned and there is, it is not going to be full, back to where it used to be, because we
used to get like 30%, former Alderman Bolton can tell you that. Alderman Dowd was also there at that point on
the high school project. So it probably won’t be 30% but it'll be something. So whatever that bond amount is
that we are talking about as part of the issue of trying to figure out how much is that bond payment going to be.
We don’t know, not only we don’t know when we are going to be buying the bonds, but we don’t know what
other money is coming in. We don’t know about potential revenue if we do something with Elm Street. So
there are a lot of unknowns.

We have talked about the student population of Nashua decreasing it has been on the decline, and it has
been. | think when | got here there were over 13,000 students, now it is a little bit over 11,000 but it has
flattened out, | don’t see it going down anymore. So when we talk about designing, we have about 2,400
students in the middle school range right now, divide that by 3 and it comes to 800, so we are planning for 800
plus.

One of things we haven't really talked about tonight was the out-of-district placement. Actually Mr. Coffman
talked a little bit about dealing with these middle school population, which we tend to do with a new school.
The School District is looking at what to do with the high school and elementary schools as well. So part of the
thought process is if you build new schools, then they are going to become attractive for the Nashua residents.
So maybe some of those kids that are going to Charter Schools might come back, we don’t know.

Finally and probably most important is that Elm Street is well beyond its useful service life. It’s tough and the
systems in the building are gone. We have put money into it, it’s like owning a boat, a boat is something you
put in the water and you pour money into, that’s what we are doing at this point. Both the staff and the
students are working and learning in substandard conditions. If you try to go there in the seasons of May and
June and September and you go to the third floor and you try to concentrate on learning, it just gets too hot,
because they systems are so old we can’t really control the heat that well. We are dealing with old unit
ventilators and controls, it is just very, very difficult. We did say it was much more expensive to renovate than
to build new. There’s a saying about lipstick or a pig that has lipstick on it, that’s exactly what we’d have if we
renovated Elm Street. It is still going to be a school built in the 1930’s. You’ve got a pretty good estimate that
Harvey put together to renovate it, but we are still not going to be meeting State standards if we do that? So
why would we pour $93 million dollars into a building and still not meet State standards.

Finally security, so if you go to Elm Street now, you get buzzed in but then you can go anywhere you want in
the school, you don’t go past a main office, it’s a situation we corrected within the foundation of Sunset
Heights. So security at Elm Street, there are so many doors in the school, the security is a very tough issue for
us. So hopefully I’ve given a little insight.

TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION

Mr. Teeboom Any earlier question was asked, “what is the affect on the tax rate” which nobody answered. To give
you an idea, the City’s Budget is made of taxes and then grants and fees. The tax portion of the City is about $180
million dollars. That means 1% of the tax rate is $1.8 million, that number has been around for quite a while. |
mentioned earlier that the first payment of the bond is going to be $8.85 million dollars. That means unless you
find the money some other place, it is going to be between 4 to 5% on the tax rate. That’s a fact. Now as far as
suddenly nobody knows what is going now, the fact that an analysis of the bond, in the analysis, I’m not going to
read the whole thing but it talks about 3.5 interest rate, 25 years. It talks about the bond being $171,690,000.00.
That’s exactly correct, | read the whole analysis and that’s exact to the dollar. Figures don’t lie.

However, if you can’t answer the question, you shouldn’t be bonding this thing. If you can’t answer the question
about what to do about the existing facility at Elm Street, you don’t have a detailed analysis down to the detailed
design, you haven’t answered the question about the tax rates and done the bonding analysis.

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P23

Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P24

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
24
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_m__121620…

Special Board of Aldermen Public Hearing — 12/16/2019 Page 24

This is not ready to be bonded. In past year, maybe 20 years ago we didn’t bond anything until the final figures
were known. Then you receive a bond authorization. This is all turned topsy down. People now come in with
these bond authorization and have very little insight to what they are doing. This is a great example.

Now we are not talking about the Performing Arts Center of $15 million or $20 million or $22 million, not even $6
million dollars, we are talking about a lot of money here, we are talking about $118 million dollar principal that
grows by 45% to become $172 million. That is a lot of money. The answers that | asked, that weren’t answered,
the answers other people asked that weren’t answered about finances, that’s is not acceptable. It is not
acceptable to say well we don’t know what the bonding is going to be like. That Mr. Treasurer is not acceptable, in
fact, that has never been done before. That people come in with bonding amounts, they had detailed analysis, and
detailed estimates. We certainly did that with Fairgrounds, | was an Alderman.

Now a final point, if you take R-191 and R-187 and R-186, these 3 bond issues before you tonight, in total has
$182 million dollar debt. $182 million. The total adds $9.5 million dollar annual payments. I’m not making it up, I'll
send you all a copy. All you do is take a look at the bond analysis, as anybody can do and has a spread sheet and
knows how to use a spread sheet, | presume you all do. You add the figures up and the figures don’t lie. $9.5
million dollars is what you are talking about the first year, that is almost 5% of the tax rate. This is certainly highly
premature. The Public Works has been pretty well thought through | thought; the other one | don’t even think you
should do. That shouldn’t be bonded. But this is real money. Before you build four story structures, final point,
somebody brought up a Charter School. North High School and South High School are consistently in the lower
30% of the State. Consistently, look up school.com look up any of these analysis, North High and South School
are below 30%. The Charter School that we have, Academy of Science & Design is the top 100 of the entire
United States.

Chairman Dowd

| think we are getting off topic.

Mr. Teeboom So buildings don’t make students. Buildings don’t create scholastic standards. You've got to start
thinking more about how to spend money to raise the education of our children instead of putting them into fancy
buildings and have the score down to 30%. That millions of dollars of charter money, | think it was criminal for the
Teacher's Union to affect a vote and turn down the money. Criminal.

Doris Hohensee 15 Swart Terrace. As to enrollment, you have to keep in mind that the District just incorporated
full day Kindergarten. So you have a pair of double working parents that needed a full day program that are
switching over to our school and in the past 2 years even with practically, you know, several hundred new
students, we have still declined year over year. So it may have flattened temporarily, but this doesn’t increase
enrollment in 2™, 3 and 4"" grade. They would eventually come here anyway but they came for Kindergarten
because it was now a full day whereas they could only get that in the private sector previously. So that has sort of
made a bubble in the numbers, but the numbers are still going down. And if we are wrong, do the study, it is part of
the State law. You want to get the building aid, you have to do the study. Statistically reliable study; we have no
study, we are just building. Thank you.

Stephen Scaer 111 East Hobart Street. When | pick a college for my daughter, | buy a car, | buy a house, | look at
how much it is going to cost me and | don’t live in nearly as nice of a house or drive as nice of a car as I'd like to.
Here you are asking me buy a school and it could be a great school but you can’t give me a rough idea of how
much it is going to cost me? | think that you are bright enough and you’ve got people that can figure that out and |
urge you to step back from this and figure out how much it is going to add to the average home price, I’m sorry
average tax bill. Thank you.

Prasad Tiruveedi 6 Medallion Court. | agree with others who spoke against this. Thank you.

Howard Coffman current member of the Board of Education. | want to thank Mr. Teeboom for his reality check. |
can tell you in my four years on the Board of Ed and we started talking about a middle school replacement 4 years
ago we brought in the same folks. The estimate then was between $40 and $50 million and didn’t involve other
schools.

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P24

Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P25

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
25
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_m__121620…

Special Board of Aldermen Public Hearing — 12/16/2019 Page 25

But | can honestly tell you at least at the Board of Education level, the Board as a whole has never had a
conversation about the bonding implications or what the true costs would be. We've heard about construction
costs and we’ve had a fair amount of discussion about that with the JSSB, but not one iota of a discussion as it
relates to the actual spending at the City and what its implications are. It is time that we do that. | have asked the
Committee, the Board of Aldermen, to defer action on this bond until further financial analysis is complete,
presented to the public and reviewed. And as someone else said, maybe we can even have referendum in the
City on it. Thank you.

Ms. Ortolano The gentleman who came up and spoke about the system who worked at the school and the
state of the schools for repair. | appreciate what he is saying, I’m not of the belief that you necessarily have to
continue to put money into those schools. But | am just very concerned that we don’t have a study that speaks
to the bond cost and an analysis of what those bonds will look like for this building. | am also very concerned
about the lack of an enrollment study and that we are potentially overbuilding.

Also, it’s almost a couple hours into this hearing and | Know that putting these three bonds on the table for one
single hearing | think was too much and | want to thank Mr. Teeboom for the analysis he provided and the
detail that he brings to these meetings because as a tax payer and a resident | do appreciate that kind of
discussion. | think in this horseshoe there is not enough of this going on. So when he overuses his one
question, the one question is far too limiting when you are asking us to approve $118 million, for us to get
behind that in a night. So | think you all get a little cranky with him but he’s raising a lot of very good points. |
want to tell you | really appreciate it. Thank you.

Chairman Dowd

Anyone else in opposition? Seeing no one, | will now close the Public Hearing. We will take a 5 minute break
before we open up the Budget Review Committee.

ADJOURNMENT
The public hearings were declared closed at 8:55 p.m.

Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien
Committee Clerk

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P25

Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P26

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
26
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_m__121620…

DPW Facilities

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P26

Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P27

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
27
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_m__121620…

Timeline

April 5, 2019 - At a Special Board of Public Works Meeting, Mayor Donchess
appointed Commissioners Moriarty and Teas to develop a working group to study
the existing conditions of the facilities and come up with potential solutions.

April 12, 2019 - Commissioners Moriarty and Teas and Director Fauteux
discussed organizing a plan that was inclusive of all stakeholders.

May 10, 2019 - Commissioners Moriarty, Teas, Aldermen Wilshire, O’Brien and
Dowd, Director Cummings and DPW staff met to discuss how to provide DPW with
an adequate work environment. Commissioner Ackerman replaced Commissioner
Moriarty on the working group.

May 23, 2019 - Board of Public Works discussed the condition of existing
facilities and approved hiring Harvey Construction to study the options of
renovation vs. new building.

October 30, 2019 - Harvey Construction presented their findings to the working
group. The committee voted unanimously to build a new DPW facility at the F CN Ba
landfill.

November 7, 2019 - Harvey Construction presented the findings to the Board of
Public Works. The Board of Public Works voted to pursue building a new DPW
facility at the landfill.

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P27

Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P28

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
28
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_m__121620…

Burke Street

Purchased for future expansion of Wastewater Treatment Facility

- Explored use of existing structures for DPW site

- Too costly to renovate
- Did not meet needs

Subdivided into two parcels

- Retained 2.5 acres for use by Wastewater Treatment Facility
- Current Value (approx.) of $ 500,000

¢« Remaining parcel to be sold for $3.9 million
- Financial needs met through sale of parcel
- Wastewater expansion needs met by retention of smaller parcel

Time is of the Essence

SYN bs By OLLeel PEL] A

/
vs
©
a
ma
=
i)
3)
7)
ioe
Oo}
cS
oy
in
©
&

WENisns evene

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P28

Board Of Aldermen - Agenda - 5/24/2016 - P60

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 21:35
Document Date
Tue, 05/24/2016 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Date
Tue, 05/24/2016 - 00:00
Page Number
60
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_a__052420…

Completed: Active contract

Tit of New BeaTort ;

Role: Energy Engineer

Project Details: Street light conversion and maintenance contract for 10,000 lights
Completed: Active contract

Role: Energy Engineer

Project Details: Streetlight retrofit for 8,100 lights for multiple cities

Completed: Active Contract

Other Experience Relevant to this Project
AutoCAD, Lighting Design, Project Management, Facility Simulations

Certifications

Certified Energy Manager (CEM), Association of Energy Engineers; 3/2013
AGi32: Emphasis on Roadway Lighting & Design, Lighting Analysis; 3/2010

Professional Associations
Plymouth Energy Committee (Plymouth, MA), Committee Member; 6/2013 - Current

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Agenda - 5/24/2016 - P60

Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P29

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
29
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_m__121620…

Current Conditions

Administration & Engineering
Street Department
Solid Waste Department
Parks & Recreation

Facilities in Disrepair
- Rodents
- Mold
- Inadequate Office Space, Storage & Conference Rooms |
- Air Quality Issues
- Inadequate Bathrooms, Locker Rooms, Break Rooms
¢ Non-ADA Compliant
- Office Sharing/Overcrowding
- Inadequate Parking
- NO Room for Growth

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P29

Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P30

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
30
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_m__121620…

san ot NASH UA
acilities Cost Stud
u
y

a

‘ ill Ul
_
i} uJ = |]

D
ecember 2, 2019

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P30

Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P31

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
31
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_m__121620…

Conceptual Cost Analysis
DPW Facilities

Conceptual Cost Analysis

Perform visual/physical
investigation of four DPW facilities:

1. Administration Building

2. Streets Department (Office)
3. Solid Waste Department

4. Parks and Recreation (Office)

Analyze existing
office/administrative/employee
spaces

Conceptualize future program and
space requirements

Estimate conceptual costs to
improve each facility

(hard costs and soft costs/
renovations and new space)

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P31

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 3580
  • Page 3581
  • Page 3582
  • Page 3583
  • Current page 3584
  • Page 3585
  • Page 3586
  • Page 3587
  • Page 3588
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page Last »

Search

Meeting Date
Document Date

Footer menu

  • Contact