Skip to main content

Main navigation

  • Documents
  • Search

User account menu

  • Log in
Home
Nashua City Data

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Search

Search

Displaying 4151 - 4160 of 38765

Board Of Aldermen - Agenda - 12/23/2019 - P151

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Fri, 12/20/2019 - 14:07
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/23/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
151
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_a__122320…

APPENDIX #C:
UFPO Local 645 Professional Employees of the Nashua Police Department
SICK BANK TRANSFER FORM

Directions: Eligible members will complete the form and submit it to the UFPO of the Nashua
Police Department Sick Bank Committee Chairman or other member of the Committee in
his/her absence. The Chairman or designee will be responsible for taking the necessary actions
to have the transfer take place and to monitor said transfer into the Sick Bank.

Date:

To: City of Nashua, Payroll Department

| would like to participate in the Sick Leave Bank of the UFPO of the Nashua Police
Department.

| wish to donate the following number of sick days to the
Program:

{Printed Name}

{Signature}

SICK BANK COMMITTEE

(Printed Name)

(Signature)

Cc: NPD, Sick Bank Committee

49

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Agenda - 12/23/2019 - P151

Board Of Aldermen - Agenda - 12/23/2019 - P152

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Fri, 12/20/2019 - 14:07
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/23/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
152
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_a__122320…

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS MADE AT PERSONNEL/ADMIN. ON 11-4-19
O-19-062

ORDINANCE

PROHIBITING THE USE OF TOBACCO PRODUCTS NEAR CITY OWNED
BUILDINGS AND IN CITY PARKS

CITY OF NASHUA

In the Year Two Thousand and Nineteen

The City of Nashua ordains that Part II “General Legislation” of the Nashua Revised
Ordinances as amended, is hereby further amended by adding the following new underlined
Chapter 304 entitled “Tobacco Products and E-Cigarettes”:

“Chapter 304
TOBACCO PRODUCTS AND E-CIGARETTES

Article I
Use of Tobacco Products and E-Cigarettes Prohibited in Certain Locations

§ 304-1. Findings and purpose.

The City finds that. based _on determinations and studies by various official agencies. the
use of tobacco products and e-cigarettes is a significant public health hazard. including
secondhand use. The purpose of this article is to protect the health and well-being of all
members of the public who have occasion to attend public places and facilities and City
parks by restricting the use of tobacco products and e-cigarettes as outlined herein. The
City also has a significant interest in reducing incidents of littering.

§ 304-1. Definitions.

The following words and phrases. when used in this Article, shall have the following
meanings:

E-CIGARETTE — Any electronic device composed of a mouthpiece. a heating element, a
battery, and e-liquid, which when heated forms an aerosol containing many substances,
including but not limited to nicotine, propylene glycol. marijuana. or other substances
delivered to the lungs. This term shall include such devices whether they are
manufactured as e-cigarettes, e-cigars. or e-pipes. or under any other product name.

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Agenda - 12/23/2019 - P152

Board Of Aldermen - Agenda - 12/23/2019 - P153

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Fri, 12/20/2019 - 14:07
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/23/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
153
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_a__122320…

PROPOSED AMENDMENTS MADE AT PERSONNEL/ADMIN. ON 11-4-19

ORDINANCE O-19-062

TOBACCO PRODUCT — Any item containing tobacco or derived from tobacco.
including. but not limited to. cigarettes. smoking tobacco. cigars, chewing tobacco. snuff.
pipe tobacco. smokeless tobacco. heated tobacco, nicotine toothpicks. and smokeless
cigarettes.

§ 160-3. Use prohibited in certain locations near City-owned buildings.

A. Use of all tobacco products and e-cigarettes is prohibited within 30 feet of any
main entrance or exit, and anv window. of all City-owned buildings. This shall
include sidewalks and walkways within the 30 feet. except when actively using
the sidewalk or walkway to get to another destination.

B. This section shall not apply to City-owned land and buildings under the control of
the board of education. the library board of trustees. the board of police
commissioners. the board of fire commissioners, the board of public works. and
the cemetery board of trustees. unless said board votes to adopt the use
prohibition found in subsection A.

§ 160-4. Use prohibited in Citv-owned parks.

Use of all tobacco products and e-cigarettes is prohibited in City-owned parks.

§ 160-5. Signs required.

Signs shall be prominently placed and maintained at all applicable City parks and public
places. notifying the public of the prohibition against the use of tobacco products and e-
cigarettes. Such signs shall state: “The use of tobacco products and e-cigarettes in this
public area is strictly prohibited.”

§ 160-6. Violations and penalties.

Any person who is found to have violated the provision of this article shall be subject to a
civil penalty in the amount of $25 for the first offense. $50 for the second offense. and
$100 for the third offense and subsequent offenses. Additionally. violators may be
removed from the City park or public place. In addition to these penalties. persons under
the age of 19 shall be subject to the provisions of RSA Chapter 126-K (“Youth Access to
and use of Tobacco Products”).”

All ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed.

This legislation shall take effect 90 days after passage.

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Agenda - 12/23/2019 - P153

Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P1

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
1
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_m__121620…

SPECIAL BOARD OF ALDERMEN
PUBLIC HEARINGS

DECEMBER 16, 2019

Public Hearings were conducted by the Board of Aldermen on Monday, December 16, 2019, at 7:00 p.m. in the
Aldermanic Chamber.

President Lori Wilshire, Chair, presided.

Members of Committee present: Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien
Alderman Ken Gidge
Alderman Linda Harriott-Gathright
Alderman Richard A. Dowd
Alderman Thomas Lopez
Alderman June M. Caron
Alderman Ernest Jette
Alderwoman Melizzi-Golja
Alderman-at-Large David C. Tencza
Alderman Jan Schmidt
Alderman-at-Large Ben Clemons
Alderman-at-Large Lori Wilshire

Members not in Attendance: Alderman Patricia Klee
Alderman-at-Large Brandon Michael Laws
Alderwoman-at-Large Shoshanna Kelly

Also in Attendance: Mayor Jim Donchess
Attorney Steve Bolton

President Wilshire
Alderman Kelly and Alderman Laws were unable to join us this evening.

President Wilshire turned the meeting over to Alderman Dowd, Chair of the Budget Review Committee,
to conduct the public hearings.

PUBLIC HEARINGS

R-19-186 - AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY TREASURER TO ISSUE BONDS NOT TO EXCEED THE
AMOUNT OF ONE MILLION FOUR HUNDRED NINETY-FIVE THOUSAND DOLLARS
($1,495,000) FOR VARIOUS IMPROVEMENTS AT THE SOLID WASTE DEPARTMENT FOUR
HILLS LANDFILL AND THE PURCHASE OF TWO REFUSE TRUCKS

Jeff LaFleur, Superintendent of Solid Waste gave a brief overview of R-19-186 before hearing public testimony.
Chairman Dowd

This evening we are hearing testimony in favor and opposition to three bonding projects for the City of Nashua,
followed by a meeting of the Budget Committee. The three bonds are R-19-186, For Various Improvements to
the Solid Waste Department Four Hills Landfill Site and Purchase of Two Refuge Trucks; R-19-187 is for The
Design and Construction of a Division of Public Works Office Facility; and R-19-191, For the Construction of a
New Middle School and the Renovation of Fairgrounds and Pennichuck Middle Schools.

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P1

Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P2

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
2
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_m__121620…

Special Board of Aldermen Public Hearing — 12/16/2019 Page 2

So there are a lot of people tonight and to be fair to everyone | would ask that you keep your comments or
questions to approximately 3 minutes. If you have a question, that you ask only one question. If, after
everyone who wants to speak has addressed the Board, there is a second round in favor or opposition for each
one of the bonds. Again, please ask clarifying questions or new questions that have not been covered by
previous speakers. For the Middle School Project there are a number of copies of the Most Frequently Asked
Questions in the back of the Chamber. Please try not to ask any of those questions that have been answered
on that sheet as they have not changed. You may ask clarifying questions which will be answered if we can
this evening or someone will have to get back to you at a later time.

Following the Public Hearing, we will be having a 5 minute break followed by the Budget Committee meeting
which has a number of items to cover including three bonds, two Police contracts as well as other Legislation.
Any actions from the Budget Committee tonight will be addressed by the Full Board of Aldermen for final action
23 December 2019 in this Chamber at 7:30.

The first item, the first bond to be heard, R-19-186 authorizing the Mayor and the City Treasurer to issue bonds
not to exceed the amount of $1,495,000.00 for various improvements at the Solid Waste Department, Four
Hills Landfill, and the purchase of two refuse trucks. Is there someone who would like to come up and explain
the reason for the bond? Please identify yourself, take any one of the seats.

Jeff LaFleur, Superintendent of Solid Waste Department

This bond consists of our setback barrier wall which is a $500,000.00 amount; expansion of my landfill gas
expansion for collecting the gases at the landfill, that is going to be about $395,000.00; and as you said, two
refuse trucks for about $600,000.00. Both the expansion of the setback barrier wall and the gas expansion are
both permit driven; it is something that has to been done yearly. That’s why those are being requested. Any
questions?

Chairman Dowd

Are there any questions from any of the Aldermen at this time for clarification on what the bond is? Seeing
none, | will call first for testimony in favor of R-19-186.

TESTIMONY IN FAVOR - None

TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION

Fred Teeboom 24 Cheyenne Drive. The problem | have with this bond, | am going to comment against each one
of them is first of all there is statement on this bond for period this applies to, it says 3%, but it doesn’t say how
many years. So the first question | have is how many years does this bond apply to?

Chairman Dowd

Treasurer Fredette, can you answer that.

David Fredette, Treasurer

20 years.

Chairman Dowd

20 years.

Mr. Teeboom 20 years is a number and the analysis is incorrect, they are basically based on about 15 years. |

have an even more serious question, this includes two refuse trucks, those trucks have a useful life of 7 years.
Why is a 7 year item including a 20 year bond?

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P2

Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P3

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
3
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_m__121620…

Special Board of Aldermen Public Hearing — 12/16/2019 Page 3

Mr. Fredette

This bond will be sold, the trucks will be for 7 years, the rest of it is 20 years, it’s right on the first page.

Chairman Dowd

Thank you so that was your one question at this point, can you come back if you have another question?

Mr. Teeboom How can you have a bond for 20 years which | just asked but you have a truck you are going to sell
for 7 years, please explain this. You have a 20 year bond which you just told me, and you said there is a 7 year
truck. So you bond it for 20 years, while the item is for 7 years, how do you combine that? How does that meet
State requirement.

Chairman Dowd

| would assume that the Bond Counsel and the Treasurer have got together and worked that out and it meets their
requirements so if you have another question, can you come back up on the second round?

Mr. Teeboom Well it is a bad assumption, | think we need a better explanation than an assumption.

Mr. Fredette

It’s not a very complicated thing. When we sell ...

Chairman Dowd

You’ve got to come up to the microphone, nobody will hear you.

Mr. Fredette

When we sell these bonds the portion related to the trucks will be purchased by people for 7 years. Those bonds,
the $600,000.00 will be 7 year bonds. The rest will be 20 years. This is something we have been doing for 35, 40
years.

Mr. Teeboom_ So there are 2 bonds; 1 for 20 years and 1 for years. Two different bonds.

Mr. Fredette

The bond itself is $1,495,000.00 but we can sell portions of it in different periods of time.

Mr. Teeboom So one bond is good for 7 years and one bond is good for 20 years.

Mr. Fredette

Right.

Stephen Bolton, Corporation Counsel

The bond authorization allows you to sell multiple bonds, not one person buys every single bond. A bond is like an
IOU, it will be many, many people buying individual bonds.

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P3

Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P4

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
4
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_m__121620…

Special Board of Aldermen Public Hearing — 12/16/2019 Page 4

Chairman Dowd

Ok Mr. Teeboom if you can allow somebody else to speak, there will be another question period for people in
opposition.

Mr. Teeboom Ok I'll come back.
TESTIMONY IN FAVOR - None

TESTIMONY IN OPPOSITION

Mr. Teeboom | could have saved the trip. Why are we bonding trucks, why are we bonding the other two items
half a million, three ninety five thousand when these are basically capital expenditures? Since when did we start
bonding $1.5 million dollar items on capital expenditures?

Chairman Dowd
Is there somebody from DPW or the Treasurer that want to address that?
Mr. Fredette

| don’t know if | have an answer that will please him but the CERF was revamped by the Board of Aldermen and
the Mayor Lozeau around 2010 and part of that plan was we would bond for certain vehicles. Most of the vehicles
from Public Works, there are some in the Fire Department, that was a plan that was adopted by this Board back in
2010. The rest of it, the soil wall and the gas system is something that is done every year, so over a period of time
it is millions of dollars. It was determined quite a few years ago that it would be bonded by the Board.

Chairman Dowd

Does that answer your question?

Mr. Teeboom Bad practice, thank you.

Chairman Dowd

Anyone else in opposition? Seeing none | will close the Public Hearing on Bond R-19-186.

R-19-187 - AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY TREASURER TO ISSUE BONDS NOT TO EXCEED THE
AMOUNT OF SIX MILLION DOLLARS ($6,000,000) FOR THE DESIGN AND CONSTRUCTION
OF A DIVISION OF PUBLIC WORKS OFFICE FACILITY

Lisa Fauteux gave a brief overview of R-19-187 before hearing public testimony.

Mayor Donchess

Mr. Chair, so we have Lisa Fauteux, Director of Public Works and others who are going to make the
presentation that was made essentially to the Board of Public Works some weeks ago. So they will go through
the different alternatives that were considered including a consolidated office facility versus expanding in
various locations or renovating in various locations. So you are going to hear from Director Fauteux as well as
others regarding everything that was considered and the conclusions that were reached. So with | will give you
Ms. Fauteux.

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P4

Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P5

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
5
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_m__121620…

Special Board of Aldermen Public Hearing — 12/16/2019 Page 5

Lisa Fauteux, Director Public Works

Thank you very much. Good evening Mayor, President Wilshire, Vice President O’Brien, Chairman Dowd and
members of the Budget Committee. Joining me tonight are Commissioners Joel Ackerman and Frank Teas,
Rob Prunier from Harvey Construction, my colleagues Tim Cummings, Director of Economic Development; Jeff
LaFleur, Superintendent of Solid Waste; Jon Ibarra, Superintendent of Streets; and Lauren Byers, Public
Relations Administrator.

We are here to speak on R-19-187, authorizing the Mayor and City Treasurer to issue bonds not to exceed the
amount of $6 million dollars for the design and construction of Public Works Office Facility. About 8 months
ago, the Mayor requested that a working group be assembled to study the current conditions of our Public
Works Facilities and provide recommendations. The working group consisted of a number of stakeholders
including Aldermen, Commissioners, Harvey Construction, Hoyle Tanner, HKT Architects, DPW Staff and the
Director of Economic Development.

This working group was unanimous in the recommendation that we will be sharing with you this evening.
Since this is the recommendation of a group, we will have several members of our group presenting this
evening. | would like to invite Tim Cummings, Director of Economic Development to first discuss the timeline
and disposition of the Burke Street Building.

Tim Cummings, Director of Economic Development

Thank you Director Fauteux, for the record, Tim Cummings, Director of Economic Development and | am up
here this evening to talk about a couple of the issues that are paramount for this project. First to orientate
everyone to the timeline; we started meeting around April to discuss how to best move forward with the idea of
a DPW facilities project. We were inclusive in our efforts, we brought various stakeholders together to hear
differing ideas and to develop a plan to move forward. We developed a preliminary plan, if you will, to look at
the existing conditions which help guide the conversation about whether it made sense to consolidate or
renovate the individual buildings. We presented the findings in early fall or mid fall | should say and ultimately
the working group made a recommendation to the Board of Public Works that we look at a new DPW Facility
consolidating the operations on the landfill. Harvey Construction helped us with the presentation in developing
these findings.

The next item in particular | want to talk about is the Burke Street site and it is really important to understand
the various dynamics that go into this project. This particular variable is of top of mind because we issued
bonds for the purchase of Burke Street. We are now looking to dispose of Burke Street. We have a P&S in
place as all of you are aware. We are going to be under an obligation to use the monies from this sale in a
very quick timetable, so time is of the essence. We will have essentially approximately 2 years or something of
that order to use the funds. We are scheduled to sell the building in mid-February. Just to re-orientate
everyone the reason why we originally purchased Burke Street was for the expansion of the Waste Water
Treatment Facility which we have been able to do because we have sub-divided 2 % acres of the Burke Street
property which we will keep within the City’s purview so we can do that future expansion.

Ultimately the Burke Street site did not meet our needs as you all know because we did some exhaustive
studies a few years back that looked at it. So | am up here this evening just to speak specifically about the
timing of this particular project and stress upon the body that we need a bond authorization as quickly as
possible to make sure all the various puzzle pieces fit together appropriately. Thank you.

Ms. Fauteux

Thank you Tim. Next Commissioner Joel Ackerman will discuss the current condition of our DPW facilities.

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P5

Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P6

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
6
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_m__121620…

Special Board of Aldermen Public Hearing — 12/16/2019 Page 6

Joel Ackerman, Board of Public Works Commissioner

Thank you Director; Joel Ackerman, Board of Public Works Commissioner. As you know the Department of
Public Works oversees several facilities. The new building committee project in question, we looked at the four
Administrative Facilities comprising the Administration and Engineering Office; Street Departments; Solid
Waste; and Parks & Rec. Currently the administration offices at these four locations provide an unhealthy
work environment for the City’s employees. Our immediate areas of concern include visible evidence of mold,
below standard air quality and live rodent activity, in adequate bathroom facilities, lack of useable office space,
inadequate storage, over-crowded lunch room and too few conference rooms available. Equally as important,
limited parking present insurmountable challenges every day for the City employees and visitors alike. Lastly,
each of these facilities are not within the ADA Federal Compliance Regulation. Nashua, as we know, is
growing exponentially, housing, traffic, streets, waste management, as well as proper sewer management and
engineering projects all require more and more attention of the Department of Public Works. The present
facilities are not equipped or prepared to meet this growth if we do not take such much needed change. Our
goal is to provide a healthy environment for our much valued City employees. Thank you.

Ms. Fauteux
Thank you Commissioner Ackerman. Rob Prunier of Harvey Construction will now present the study that they
completed comparing renovation of our existing facilities to building a new facility. | think I'll hand this over to

you.

Rob Prunier, Harvey Construction

Good evening everyone, my name is Rob Prunier and | am with Harvey Construction Corporation. | am here
tonight to make your night as exciting as possible and | am sure all these slides are going to be very enthralling
to you but it was part of the due diligence that we were asked to help the Department of Public Works with to
really assess their current facilities and what it would take to bring those facilities up to snuff. With that we
went ahead and we are not architects, we are builders, so we really took a perspective from a building
perspective. We looked at the Admin Building, the Streets Department, the Solid Waste parking and Parks &
Rec Department. We were focused on the office components of each of these facilities and that is important to
really hone in on is that we are talking about the administration and office aspects of these programs.

We went in and we analyzed each building, visually, physically, we asked a lot of questions. We tried to
conceptualize some thoughts in terms of what each Department needed for future growth and future
programmatic benefits to each Department. We tried to put numbers together for each one of those buildings
so that you could make some educated decisions on whether or not or where you want to invest your money.

The first building we looked at was the Administrative Building. Again these are the slides that are really going
to excite you. The DPW Administration really utilizes the front of this building, the back and the side is used
more for the Police Department for storage and what have you. The DPW utilizes the first and second floor;
the first floor is about 9,600 square feet and the second floor is about 8,700 square feet. So our task was “how
do we renovate those areas to bring them up to code, to bring them to where systems are adequate for every
day work”. There was a small reorganization of the front entry way with bathrooms and reception areas
including an elevator that needed to be put in. It still did not meet all programmatic needs of the Administrative
Offices. They needed a little bit more space, we said, “Where can we put that space in conjunction with this
building”. The area in the red there is the only space that made sense. We went through a little of a
programmatic effort, played architect for a little bit and came up with some ideas in terms of what they needed
and this is the result of that. So it was about an additional 2,200 square feet, one story. Of course that means
you are taking some parking out so we had to figure out where we could put some more parking. Again the
area in the red identifies that area and it is kind of a net on the parking side of things. But that allows you to
get the parking and the space you need.

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P6

Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P7

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 22:31
Document Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Mon, 12/16/2019 - 00:00
Page Number
7
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_m__121620…

Special Board of Aldermen Public Hearing — 12/16/2019 Page 7

So again, we are talking about renovating about 18,300 square feet, that is major renovations to the reception
area, new HVAC systems, an elevator, new lights, fire alarms, sprinklers, new roof over the admin and the
engineering areas. The addition, we figured it is going to take about 12 months, we went through and this is
going to be a common formula that you see for all these buildings, we estimated, we’ve got detailed estimates
as best we could. On the construction hard costs, we put some contingency in there, we figured out what the
architectural and engineering costs would be, GEO-technical engineering, HazMat survey, we put some money
in there. We did not include money in the hard costs, we are hoping in the contingency maybe that could be
covered. But it is important to know that there were some costs that were not included in these estimates and
that is, what do we do with folks while we are renovating for temporary space? What is the definition of the
HazMat remediation or the mold remediation that has to happen? And certainly a structural engineering study
probably should be done on that building. So at the end of the day, we figured it is about, all in, about $5.5
million dollars to renovate that building.

Next we looked at the Street Department and again we only looked at the office component of the Street
Department Building; we weren’t looking at the maintenance and the shop portions of that building. To the left
is the existing drawing that we had for the first floor, that would obviously require some renovations. The
second floor, again we talked to the Department, talked about what programmatically they could use. There
was a multi-purpose room that could be used for beds for those long storms and what have you, some
gathering space, some locker rooms and of course elevator and stair towers are going to be required if you
add a second floor.

In total, the first and second floor would be 10,400 square feet; again you are renovating all the systems, you
are putting new life safety systems in. When you go through the whole process, including contingencies and
architectural, you get down to about $4.2 million dollars to expand and renovate the Street Department Facility,
the office part of that.

Then we looked at the Parks & Recreation Department and again we only looked at the office side of things:
we did not look at the maintenance or the shop pieces of the facilities. That building is kind of in two pieces,
the newer piece is in the purple there, about 1,360 square feet. The 1902 building is about 1,287 square feet.
Our feeling, after going through that, is that that 1902 building should just come down. It does not make a lot
of sense to put money into that building, | am sorry Alderman Caron. Again | am showing you this because we
tried to do as much homework as we can. We tried to get measurements and we tried to figure out what this
space would look like and what would it feel like and what kind of square footage that would mean.

So we assessed that this program would work to help the Park & Recreation Department out. The first floor is
about 1,485 square feet. This is what it would like combined with the existing building on the first floor, excuse
me, that would be the second floor, this is kind of the basement, there’s two access points. So you take down
the 1902 building, you would add a new two story addition which would total 2,900 square feet, you renovate
the existing space, all new systems, life safety, what have you; you get to about $3.192 million dollars.

Finally we looked at the Solid Waste Department. It is about 6,400 square feet and our assessment that it is
best if that building comes down to the ground. You can reuse the footprint, but the building itself has really
used its life and we don’t see the value of trying to rebuild that building. So we took a shot at what it might look
like, again we are not architects | can’t emphasize that enough. We put a program together, interviewing the
Directors and talking to staff and figuring out what the minimum was that they would need. We came up with
this floor plan and the total cost for that is about $3 million dollars. | will emphasize that we looked at the
minimal work that has to be done to get these buildings up and running, there is nothing emphatic, there’s
nothing exciting or architecturally beautiful about any of the things we are proposing here, but they just get
back to useable buildings. What they don’t do, what none of these estimates really address are future growth
or proper programmatic needs; this was kind of the minimum if you will.

So in summary when you add up the four buildings and the work that we think needs to be done there, this is
all in, hard and soft costs, you are almost at $16 million dollars. Immediately we realized that $16 million
dollars is not something that would pass muster here. It doesn’t get you what you need in terms of program, in
terms of future growth.

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 12/16/2019 - P7

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹‹
  • …
  • Page 412
  • Page 413
  • Page 414
  • Page 415
  • Current page 416
  • Page 417
  • Page 418
  • Page 419
  • Page 420
  • …
  • Next page ››
  • Last page Last »

Search

Meeting Date
Document Date

Footer menu

  • Contact