Search

Hypercapnia can cause drowsiness, headaches dizziness and shortness of breath among other
things. If can even cause one to pass out.

Hypercapnia will lower the O2 level in your blood. This will lead io Hypoxia which is an absence of
enough ©2 to sustain bodily tissues. Wearing a mask will also increase blood pressure and cortisol
ievels. These things can be particularly harmful for people with cancer or heart conditions - the very
people who have been iold to wear masks to protect their health. .

Additionally the Inside of the mask gets warm and moist becoming a petri dish for any germs you've
exhaled. You will then be inhaling more germs into your body then you exhaled out and these germs
can make you sick.

If you don a mask, you are likely to touch it frequenily for adjustments. This will transfer germs from
your hands {or gloves) to add to the petri dish growing on the inside of your mask.

There are many doctors and scientific studies to confirm the above information. There is virtualy no
evidence that shows a positive effect for wearing a mask Links below

CDC AUGUST 24
httos://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/cdc-quidelines-say-wearing-a-mask-durin…-
exposure-to-coronavirus-wont-prevent-possible-infection

WHO June 6
hitos://m.youtube.com/waich?feature-youtu. be&v=NOQTBIbx1 Xjs

SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES

1) https://drive.google.com/file/d/127UF1DP7wNOQpSTEZF4-

LUGvbITJbq0av/view?fbclid=IlwAR3CC6RkigCjJ9aoT UCKSocgxgN 1sAr7ig64c3v2g8Y9icGrSaqqllPnu
vw

2)ntips://www.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/pme/articles/PMC4420971/

3)https:/jwww.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2020/04/data-do-not-back-cloth-mask…-

19-experts-say

4)https://pubmed. ncbi.nim.nih.gow/18500410/

5)httos://pubmed.nebi.nim.nih.gov/32405162/?fbclid=IwAR25MaLMSvZW PhX9kcMHQQZH932ZMLo

BGOed5Eqn69 OkYFvYvDxta3oJ/1yA

6)https:/Avww.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/pme/articles/PMC7219423/

7 )https://oubmed.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/15340662/

8) https://academic.oup.com/annweh/article/54/7/789/202744

9)\https://pubmed.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/31479137/

10)}httos:/Awww.neim.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMp2006372

11 https:/Avwwne.cde.gov/eid/article/26/5/19-0994 article

12)https://visionlaunch.com/more-than-a-dozen-credible-medical-studies-pro…-

work-even-in-hospitals/

13)hitips://pubmed.ncbi.nim.nih.gov/32668444/

DOCTORS AND OTHER MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS

1 )https://www.technocracy.news/blaylock-face-masks-pose-serious-risks-to-…
2)nttps://m.youtube.com/watch? v=F6B96XoBboc

2)httos://m.facebook.com/story.php?story fbid=3227186510704784&id=34 1163402640457
3)https://m.youtube.com/watch?feature=youtu. be&v=YQo7bV2hzBY
A\nttps://iennifermargulis.net/healthy-people-wearing-masks-during-
covid19/?fbclid=lwAROWNwuczAdy4vs08upwPujolLvAZr4O rOghi4zZ xPz8hNNnctEAyXxGZbM
5)httos://deeprootsathome.com/masks-facts-from-an-rn-and-6-things-that-weaken-our-immune-

systems/
6)https://youtu.be/RaE6NeHyDtU

7 )https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story fbid=27623 1940292992 &id=1429618713952936
8)https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story fhid=2605347879682836&id=14296 18713952936
9)https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story fbid=2605347879682836&id=1429618713952936
10)https://fee.org/articles/europes-top-heaith-officials-say-masks-arent-h…
11 )httos:/Awww.bitchute.com/video/zM7YEOTI36qN/
12)hitps://podcasts.nu/avsnitt/london-real/dr-sherri-tenpenny-face-masks-are-not-effective-against-
covid-19-how-masks-are-being-used-to-control-the-population

13)httos://m.youtube.com/watch? v=bkxaGVQyfrA&feature=youtu. be

14) https://articles. mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2020/07/19/are-face-masks-
effective.aspx?cid_source=dnl&cid_medium=email&cid_content=arti HL&cid=2020071921&mid=DM6
00307 &rid=920161191

OSHA PPE CERTIFIED EXPERTS
1)https://youtu.be/8pr7nirqOzA
2)https://www.bitchute.com/video/tOMvJtmxXn8JE/

SURGEON GENERAL ON MASKS
hitps:/Avwww.foxnews.com/media/surgeon-general-explains-masks-public-coronavirus

DR FAUCI SAID NO MASKS
htto://adam.curry.com/html/NOMASKSORG-7SvkmhpzqCvPckCJKPOwkKrd& mxsfaG html

COMMENTARIES

Thttps://m.youtube.com/waich?v=U47_ sRuGOYqg
2)https://m.youtube.com/waich?v=bkxaGVQytrAéfeature=youtu.be
S)https://youtu.be/J6Z6KTSncaY
4\hitps://swprs.org/face-masks-evidence/

DEMONSTRATION THAT THE MASK CHANGES 02 & CO2 RATIO IN BREATH
hitos:/Avww.bitchute.com/video/piICQnZVzhmQa/

INFORMATIVE VIDEOS

1)https:/Avwww.instagram.com/p/CDJmDyQHEQ8/?utm_ source=igq web button share sheet
2)https://m.facebook.com/story.php? story fbid=172645448083537 7 &id=272455363101 747
S)https://youtu.beAVad4pEgHb80

4)

https:/Avww.facebook.cony/1457447671152590/posts/289 1013137796029/?extid=Ud4msTNrOoFmRLhA
WO0&d=null&vh=e

5)https://themodelhealthshow.com/maskfacts/

NEWSWORTHY ARTICLES ABOUT MASK HARM

1 Jhitps:/Avww. foxnews.com/health/chinese-jogger-coronavirus-mask-suffers-burst-lung-wuhan-
hospital-says

2 )https://nypost.com/2020/05/06/two-boys-drop-dead-in-china-while-wearing…-
class/
3)https://www.foxnews.com/us/nj-police-say-excessive-wearing-of-n95-coron…-
to-woman-passing-out-crashing-car

4)hittps:/Awww-bostonherald-
com.cdn.ampproject.org/v/s/www.bostonherald.com/2020/07/08/massachusetts-man-pulls-qun-on-
maskless-man-in-walqreens-parking-lot-amid-coronavirus-mask-order-

3

police/amp/?7amp js v=a3& _gsa=1&usgp=mg331AQIKAGWASDAAGQE %3D#aoh=159741544557308
ct=1597415459703&csi=1 &referrer=https%3A%ZF%2Fwww.google.comé& tf=From%20%251%24s
&ampshare=https%3A%2F %2Fwww.bostonherald.com%2F2020%2F07%2F08%2Fmassachusetts-
man-pulls-gun-on-maskless-man-in-walgreens-parking-lot-amid-coronavirus-mask-order-police%2F
5)https://www.clickorlando.com/news/local/2020/06/04/sketch-released-of-m…-
lake-mary-child-police-say/

RESOURCES

1} hitps:/Awww.makeamericansfreeagain.com

2 www.thehealihyamerican.org

3)htip:/Awww.askdrbuttar.com/facemask

4\htips://books.google.com/books/about/The Case Against Masks. himl?id=T8DwDWAAQBAJ&print
sec=frontcover&source=kp read button

To receive an emailed copy -send an email to maskfree@protonmail.com

| have attached an additional pdf with other relevant information.

Sincerely,

Chery! Rounds
25 Olesen Rd
Derry, NH

weenen ee Forwarded message ---------

From: Cheryl Rounds <blissfullyvhealthy@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, Sep 22, 2020, 10:36 AM

Subject: Masks

To: Cheryl Rounds <blissfullyhealthy@email.com>

Face Masks and Covid-19

Many people think masks should be mandatory to control the spread of infection.
This handout is intended for governors, mayors, alderman, employers and business-
es considering a mask policy and also for those people who would be affected by
such a policy.

There are several things that need to be taken into consideration regarding requiring
the wearing of masks. Are they necessary, legal, safe, effective and warranted?
| will attempt to answer these questions in this handout.

First, are masks necessary? Fe animes ws COUR IBCne yo st Ot sh 8
For the first four months of Covid-19 we were all walking .
around in big box and grocery stores without masks. It is aeaenttoneotngi

my contention that if the virus were as deadly and conta- ws
gious as it was said to be, we all would have been dropping
like flies during this time. Yes, there were many deaths that
occurred in these first four months but the vast majority te
were among seniors in nursing homes and there is no evi- "
dence the virus was being spread through shoppers. Now, baectoran

four months later, mask mandates are being initiated when

the death rate has dropped off to near zero. Here is a graph showing the rise and fall of Covid-19
deaths in Ontario along with the time table of mask introduction to illustrate this point.

Mandatory Niask
implemented...

Why are yall wearing a mask? Mask recommendations are based on three assumptions:
Even the box is saying it doesn't . . . -
protect against covid19 or other (1) Covid-19 is spread by asymptomatic carriers, (2) masks

viruses.

will work to stop the virus and (3) the virus is deadly.
Regarding asymptomatic carriers, The WHO said on June 6th that asymptom-
atic carrier spread was rare. The study “A study on ineffectivity of asymptomatic
SARS-CoV-2 carriers” that can be found on PubMed.gov https://www.ncbi.nim.
nih.gov/pmce/articles/PMC7219423/, exposed 455 people, which included hos-
pital staff, family members and patients, to an asymptomatic carrier. None of the
people exposed developed the virus. Regarding the effectiveness of masks, there
is no science that definitively supports the theory that masks will work to stop

a virus. Even the mask boxes clearly state the masks are not effective. And furthermore, the current
recovery rate per CDC statistics is 99.76%. Stockholm University
says the chances of surviving Covid-19 at over 99% for people under
60 and just slightly less if you are over 60. These survival rates show
Covid-19 is causing far less deaths than the flu has most years.

No Underting
Condillans Condition
SO9CRS5
S0.50006
33.9998
gy. 9095
So. G95 Do.5iSs
BRAaES Op edT
59.9562 ORES
WAM B7,6EB8
£9027 O25152

Is a forced mask policy legal?

While not yet legally challenged (to my knowledge), it can be argued
that a mask policy can be interpreted as practicing medicine without oe
a license. A mask is a medical device. (According to life changing “ded oat ter eden hu omer By
interventions: -A medical device is an instrument, apparatus, implant, re
machine, tool, in vitro reagent, or similar article that is to diagnose,

prevent, mitigate, treat, or cure disease or other conditions, and, unlike a pharmaceutical or bio-
logic, achieves its purpose by physical, structural, or mechanical action but not through).

Furthermore, since a mask can easily be shown to have a negative impact on bodily functions in

3 ways: (1) with a finger oximeter that will show blood oxygen levels will drop, (2) with an OSHA
meter that measures O2 & CO2 levels that is in the area where one is breathing and (3) with blood
pressure readings taken before and after a period of time with a mask, the mask has consequences
to the health of any individual and therefore should only be prescribed by a medical doctor that
has evaluated a person for their ability to safely wear said medical device.

Ordering universal mask use can be said to be practicing medicine without a license which is

not legal. Additionally, OSHA has standards and regulations regarding mask use in the work-
place. The standards require that a person needs to be medically evaluated before a mask can be
worn, For more information on OSHA standards on PPE see https://m.youtube.com/watch? fea-
ture=youtu.be&fbclid=IwAROGKfIn0Qp YceA-NGmXJNZ-WwsR3 YQbRVUrLUTdAluW V_qw-
J4TSYe6nU4U &v=KeovvuviAJM#menu. Aside from these legal issues is the question of whether
an ordinance not passed by a legislative body can be legally enforced. And lastly there are issues as
to whether a mask mandate goes against our constitutional and civil rights.

What about the liability issues with a mask policy?

You may be concerned about the liability issues of someone who acquires Covid-19 and claims
they got in in your shop or business if you don’t have a mask policy. Such a lawsuit would have
no merit as there would be no way to prove the causation of a person’s illness. On the other hand,
if you have a universal mask policy, you could be deemed liable if the mask causes harm to one
of your patrons or employees. Short term use of a mask can cause a person to become dizzy and
faint. If this happens and the person injures themselves on your premises and you have a manda-
tory mask policy, you could be legally liable.

There are also health issues that can be caused by prolonged wearing of a mask. This is because
the mask will collect germs that are being exhaled. The warm moist interior surface of the mask
will then act as a petri dish and multiply these germs. Rebreathing these bacteria and viruses can
cause illness to the mask wearer. Some medical conditions that can be caused by prolonged mask
wearing include, but are not limited to: pleurisy, bronchitis, Legionnaires’ Disease, collapsed lung,
impetigo, staph infections, heart attacks and even Covid. If you are requiring employees to wear

a mask and they develop a medical condition that can be attributed to the forced mask wearing,
you could be found liable for their medical problems.

At this point, you may want to argue that medical doctors wear masks
all day. Until recently they were not frequently used outside of surgery or dental offices. They
are actually called surgical masks because they were designed to be used in surgery to stop spittle
from the medical staff from contaminating an open sterile surgical site. Surgery takes place ina
controlled, air-conditioned environment. In addition, extra oxygen is pumped into the room to
compensate for the mask wearing. Surgeons are trained to wear masks, know not to touch them
and change them frequently. When they are used in a doctor's office, they are changed between
each patient encounter to avoid cross contamination. The pores on both surgical masks and N95

masks are too large to stop a virus which is only 0.1 microns in size. Cloth masks have even larger
pores. These masks were never designed to stop viral transmission and requiring untrained per-
sons to wear a mask can have unintended consequences.

Some other things to consider:

1) Deaf and hard of hearing persons lose the ability to communicate when they can't
read lips.

2) Veterans, rape victims and others with PTSD cannot wear a mask without serious
psychological effects and may also be triggered emotionally when they see others wearing masks.
3) Masks hide faces and make it harder to identify persons committing crimes.
Shoplifting becomes easier. And heaven forbid, a child is abducted in your establishment, even
with video footage, it would be difficult to identify the perpetrator.

4) And lastly masks hide smiles, a normal human emotion. A smile is contagious and
promotes a sense of wellbeing. A lack of smiles can create an atmosphere of fear and anger. If an
establishment has a required mask policy, some patrons believe they have the right to confront
and intimidate others with no masks. This can put the safety of all at risk and has even escalated
to gun fire on at least two occasions so far.

In closing I would iike to implore you to take all these points into
consideration. Are your citizens, customers and/or employees going to be safer and healthier
with the mask policy you choose to go with? Is the policy going to lead to a positive or negative
environment? Are you following science or just kowtowing to the fear mongering that is currently
sweeping our country? A report with links to scientific studies, medical experts and news articles
relating to mask wearing is included along with this handout for further information.

~ Written by a member of #healthfreedomNH

From: Daniel Steagald <dansteagald@icloud.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 6:23 AM

To: Board of Aldermen

Subject: Mask Mandate

CAUTION: This email came from outside of the organization. Do not click links/open attachments if source is unknown.

Good morning folks

| just read a news article about the update to Nashua’s face covering policy. It’s not like me to reach out to politicians
but | wanted to say thank you for continuing to take this pandemic seriously and for doing what’s necessary to keep our
city safe (even if it somehow offends many people}. It’s a hard spot to be in, but please know some of us in Nashua fully
support these actions. Thanks again

Dan Steagald
17 1/2 Arlington St
Nashua NH 03060

Sent from my iPhone

Graham, Donna

From: Laurie Ortolano <laurieortolano@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 24, 2020 9:09 AM

To: Board of Aldermen; Brown, Louise

Subject: Fwd: Adopting new abatement procedures

CAUTION: This email came from outside of the organization. Do not click links/open attachments if source is
unknown.

I want to share with you all a procedural change I would like to address with the Board of Assessors but will
also be addressing with the Aldermen. I am requesting that Lousie Brown and Donna Graham place this
correspondence in the next Board packet for the respective Boards.

Thank you,

Laurie Ortolano
41 Berkeley St.
Nashua, NH 03064

n--------- Forwarded message ---------

From: Laurie Ortolano <laurieortolano@gmail.com>

Date: Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 8:57 AM

Subject: Adopting new abatement procedures

To: Board of Assessors <boassess@unashuanh.gov>

Cc: Leonard, Celia <LeonardC@nashuanh.gov>, Legal Department <Legal@nashuanh.gov>,
<normandr(@nashuanh.gov>, Mandile, Michael <mandileM@nashuanh.gov>, Dame, Douglas
<dameD(@nashuanh.gov>, Turgiss, Gary <GaryT(@nashuanh.govy>, Turgiss, Greg <GregT(@nashuanh.gov>,
Kleiner, Kimberly <kleinerK(@nashuanh.gov>, Gerry, James <James.Gerry@dra.nh.gov>

THIS IS NOT A RIGHT TO KNOW DOCUMENT REQUEST - NO DOCUMENTS ARE BEING
REQUESTED

September 24, 2020
Board of Assessor members,

I am requesting that this letter be accepted as a correspondence for the next Board packet.
Laurie Ortolano

41 Berkeley St

Nashua

I am concerned about the method used to address or fail to address my 2019 abatement. | had an opportunity to
speak with 3 well respected Chiefs and the DRA this week. I do not understand why my abatement was allowed
to expire without action and I would like to understand why that method was used. I have submitted discovery
questions to help me understand the process.

That being said, I would like to offer some of the remarks shared from my communication with other officials
on this matter.

Every abatement is treated as a separate entity by the BTLA or courts.

An abatement is not litigation, an appeal is.

The purpose of an abatement is to determine an opinion of value for a property based on the April 1 date of the
abatement year.

It is believed that the language "failure to respond is a denial" appears to have been added to RSA 76:16 at some
later date. I have not researched this yet, but will do so.

Based on information and belief in communicating with state experts, they believe the language was added to
account for an accidental abatement misplacement or oversight that would cause an abatement to inadvertently
be overlooked.

Based on information and belief in communicating with state experts, it is not intended to be means for
deliberately deciding to skip it.

The Board of Assessor or Selectmen are responsible for approval, denial, or failure to respond.

One Chief stated that they had never used "failure to respond" for a denial and that all applications are acted on.
One Chief stated that they act on all abatments that do not have a representative. They did say that commercial
properties that do have a representative sometimes do not receive a letter of denial, but the Chief is in frequent
communication with these people and knows them well, for example, CPTM as a representative.

One Chief said they almost never do not respond to an abatement and only have done so on commercial
properties with representatives. They said that the BTLA frowns about just ignoring an application without
good cause.

Here are some procedural changes I would like the Board to consider:

1. All abatement applications submitted, that do not have a representative assigned, will be acted on, either
approved or denied, with a letter sent.

2. The final abatement list provided to the Board will clearly show abatements that were deemed denied by
failure to respond. The board will then be able to monitor what properties fall in this category.

3. Anyone who submits an application that is being acted on will be allowed to know who the Certified
Supervisor Assessor is assigned perform the abatement or provide oversight. If the abatement is
assigned to a certified assessor to do the work, this information will be public for the property owner.

4. As it stands right now the abatement list does provide the name of the assessor assigned to the property,
so this is a public document and property owners can have this information. Additionally, the assessor
contacts the property owner to visit the property and review the card.

5. However, property owners whose properties are listed with consultants are not allowed to have the name
of the consultant. I believe this may not be legal and may be an unfair process for those with abatements.
Property owners whose abatements are assigned to a consultant have no way to verify that a certified
supervisor assessor is addressing their application. They have to use a more cumbersome and extensive
Right-To-Know process to figure this out.

6. All property owners that request placement on the agenda for communication regarding their abatement
will not be denied the request. You can establish the rule that they will only have 1 opportunity to
address the board, etc.

Here is why I am requesting these procedural changes.
1. J was told by Attorney Bolton that Ms. Kleiner was handling my 2019 abatement. Ms. Kleiner is not a

certified supervisor assessor but she did provide a list that showed the abatement was placed with a
consultant.

2. Mr. Greg Turgiss was a certified Supervisor Assessor but could not address my 2019 abatement because
ofa conflict of interest.

3. When I asked Ms. Kleiner to provide the name of the consultant assigned to my abatement, I received no
response and she would not provide the name.

4, Because I receive no response, and I have a hostile relationship with the Assessing office, Legal Office,
and Mayor, I believe that the City did not use a consultant to determine an opinion of value.

5. T have not had the opportunity to speak with an expert about my 2018 appeal or 2019 abatement,
because the City has provided no expert for me. The Legal office provided no expert for the mediation
on February 13, 2020 for the 2018 appeal. Ms. Kleiner provided no expert or name for the 2019
abatement. I seem to be overlooked and believe it is retaliation.

6. I was denied four times the opportunity to address the Board regarding my 2019 application when other
property owners were granted the opportunity to speak with the Board.

7. The Board can only prevent this from happening again, if you enact procedures to prevent this from
happening again.

Sincerely,
Laurie Ortolano