Board Of Aldermen

SIEMENS

Appendix A— Resumes

9225 Bee Cave Rd Www. siemens.usa.com
Building B, Ste 101 512-837-8000
Austin, TX 78733 Page 26

Proposed quantity | Proposed Wattage shanieaetie Proposed Fixture Ordering Information (1) eee ani oy ters! Unit Cost Per a noel i we MEE ATER DS
| anufacturer Per Fixture (3) Fixture (4) (0*)) | Cost Per (a* Mm) (mA) I
(D* H) |_Fixture {5) (D*L) (H+J+L)
3906 24 Leotek GCJ1-20G-MV-NW-2-GY-270 $ 130.35 | $ 509,147.10 | 5 43.97 $ 171,746.82 | $ 53.06 | $ 207,252.36 $ 227.3815 888,146.28 270
367 38 _ Leotek GCJ1-20G-MV-NW-2-GY-: $ 130.35 | $ 47,838.45 | $ 43.97 § 16,136.99 | $ 53.06 |$ 19,473.02 $ 227.38 | $ 83,448.46 480

riupuscu

pWiatenial wie Cus

tutes

recs wie ura 1g)

Unive Gunreiie

SIEMENS

Attachment B — Cost Proposal

9225 Bee Cave Rd www, Siemens.usa.com
Building B, Ste 101 512-837-8000
Austin, TX 78733 Page 23

ID ~~ Task Name Duration Start Finish 716 Qtr 3, 2016 Qtr 4, 2016 Qtr 1, 2017
Oo cones uum vine May dun dub Aug. Sep. Oct. Nov.) Dec. Jan Feb.
Q Nashua, NH SL Conversion Project 155 days Mon 6/13/16 Sun 1/15/17)
1 Contract Award 0 days Mon 6/13/16 Mon6/13/16 @ 6/13
2 Pre-Construction 50 days Mon 6/13/16 Fri 8/19/16 errr
3 Install 3000K fixtures - Trial Period 20 days Mon 6/13/16 Fri 7/8/16
4 Pre-construction meeting 1 day Mon 7/18/16 Mon7/18/16
5 NOTICE TO PROCEED 0 days Tue 7/19/16 Tue 7/19/16 7/19

Conceptual Schedule

The following page is a conceptual schedule showing staffing, product procurement lead time, and
proposed monthly minimum installation quotas.

9225 Bee Cave Rd www, Slemens.usa.com
Building B, Ste 101 512-837-8000
Austin, TX 78733 Page 21

can make an informed decision about whether to further pursue this option. Regardless of the
community's choice, Siemens recommends the incorporation of a 7-pin photocell receptacle so that at a
minimum, the LED fixtures installed via this project are “controls ready” so that wireless controls could
be incorporated at a later date following Eversource tariff acceptance and if the future project
cost/benefits are deemed acceptable by the City/Town.

Construction

After reviewing the quotes, the decision was made to present Leotek/Cimcon pairing in our base
proposal since the combination of initial capital cost and 10-year operating costs were the lowest. For
reference and further consideration, Acuity pricing was approximately 15% higher across the board, and
Philips was approximately 46% higher. However, we also understand that the City may have other
priorities and factors which may lead to selection of a different controls manufacturer.

We specialize in maintenance, so we gravitate toward lighting fixtures that are well-designed and
provide the longest proven maintenance-free service. We have extensive experience in assisting in the
selection of appropriate fixtures, performing test installations, light level studies, and helping our
customers promote the financial and environmental benefits of the initiative. Our objective is to
provide both vendor neutral and objective information to the City, enabling informed decisions at each
project phase.

Energy Savings Analysis

SIEMENS

Fixture Selection/Energy Savings Analysis

Fixture Selection