Search

Board of Aldermen Page 7
January 10, 2017

would suggest reaching out to them via e-mail or the phone because it is my intention to not have them come
again to the meeting.

MOTION CARRIED

REPORTS OF COMMITTEE

Finance COMMiIttee........ occ ceccceccceccceceeeceeeeeeeaueeauseaeseaeeeaeseaeeeaeenaes 12/21/16

There being no objection, President McCarthy declared the report of the December 21, 2016
Finance Committee accepted and placed on file.

WRITTEN REPORTS FROM LIAISONS — None

CONFIRMATION OF MAYOR'S APPOINTMENTS — None
UNFINISHED BUSINESS — RESOLUTIONS

R-16-084
Endorsers: Alderman David Schoneman
Alderman Richard A. Dowd
Alderwoman Mary Ann Melizzi-Golja
Alderman Don LeBrun
Alderman Tom Lopez
Alderman-at-Large Brian S. McCarthy
AUTHORIZING A TWENTY YEAR EXTENSION (FROM 2047 TO 2067) OF THE MASTER LEASE
TO THE NASHUA AIRPORT AUTHORITY
Given its second reading;

MOTION BY ALDERMAN SCHONEMAN TO AMEND R-16-084 IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REPLACING IT WITH
THE GOLDEN ROD COPY PROVIDED WITH THE AGENDA

ON THE QUESTION
Alderman Schoneman

The only change is to change the term. The Nashua Airport Authority initially asked for a 20-year extension
from 2047 to 2067 and the master lease has in fact been amended and extended for various lengths of time
since its inception in 1974. In this case for two purposes, one to avoid what could seem to be a haphazard
periodic extension process and two, to give more authority to the Nashua Airport Authority or more ability to
attract investments. All of the buildings out there are built with private investment on leased land so to give
more security to investors we have asked for or changed it to amend it say that the master lease will continue
until December 31, 2115; that’s a 99-year extension which went through the Finance Committee in December
of 2016.

MOTION CARRIED

MOTION BY ALDERMAN SCHONEMAN FOR FINAL PASSAGE OF R-16-084 AS AMENDED
MOTION CARRIED

Resolution R-16-084 declared duly adopted as amended.

Board of Aldermen Page 8
January 10, 2017

UNFINISHED BUSINESS — ORDINANCES

MOTION BY ALDERWOMAN MELIZZI-GOLJA TO WITHDRAW FROM COMMITTEE ORDINANCE
O-16-020, CLARIFYING AND UPDATING THE ELDERLY HOUSING SUPPLEMENTAL USE
REGULATIONS
MOTION CARRIED
O-16-020

Endorser: Mayor Jim Donchess

CLARIFYING AND UPDATING THE ELDERLY HOUSING SUPPLEMENTAL USE REGULATIONS
Given its second reading;

MOTION BYALDERWOMAN MELIZZI-GOLJA TO AMEND O-16-020 BY REPLACING IT WITH
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENTS MADE AT THE PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT
COMMITTEE MEETING OF JANUARY 3, 2017

ON THE QUESTION

President McCarthy

The purpose of this is to amend it and schedule a public hearing and re-refer it to the Planning Board
which needs to be done before action can be taken on it.

Alderman Siegel

Will another action be to re-refer it to committee for debate at the Aldermanic level? | didn’t expect to
be debating this now. | didn’t Know it was coming out of committee; | just made the assumption that
we were just going to debate it at that point potentially.

President McCarthy

We can re-refer it the committee as well if you like.

Alderman Siegel

It’s the will of the Board.

President McCarthy

The committee is basically done with it and produced amendments at their last meeting but if you want
to re-refer it to the committee so that they get another look at it after the Planning Board has
commented. It actually is referred to the committee essentially because the public hearing will be
scheduled at the next committee meeting.

Alderman Siegel, just to clarify, it was necessary for the Board to amend it before the public hearing
could be scheduled.

Alderman Siegel

Thank you for the clarification.

Board of Aldermen Page 8
June 14, 2016

and have the support of the residents of the city. There is certainly a potential with the fines and the
increases that it could go over the statutory limits of RSA 31:393 which is a $1,000 limit for per offense
and that hasn’t been addressed in the ordinance. Once again, if there was an event based violation that
you could set up based on the seriousness of the event. That’s basically some of the points of the
memorandum itself. It could use a definition section on exterior standards versus building code
violations; it’s very ambiguous in a lot of instances. Ultimately, we understand that you are trying to cut
down on litigation and trying to cut down on the district court process but what you are doing essentially
is you are front loading the judge, jury and executioner so to speak with the inspectional people. At that
time the people are there to explain and to talk to people and probably get a break. If they are not around
at the time then they are not going to have an opportunity to explain anything. If there is appeals
process then now you have a back loaded process where people will always have an opportunity to
speak their minds and you are going to find a situation where people are going to be stuck paying fines
and they are going to demand to get to court even if it costs them more money, it’s just human nature,
they are going to want somebody to hear their story. Finally, there is a potential that this backfires and it
really causes rents to sky rocket. You may even see a new category in rents; first month, last month,
security deposit and all of a sudden there may be a new category, administrative fine deposit. You get
your money back at the end of the year if you don’t cause administrative fines at the property. | want to
thank you for listening to me and once again, | think that if you listen to the people in the city and get a
little bit more input then you are working in the right direction but it’s just not quite there yet. Once again |
request that you deny it, send it back to sub-committee or table it for another two weeks and just allow
more input to come in. Thank you very much.

Mr. Greg Lombard, 106 W. Parish Road

| own one building in this city and | don’t have much to add to what’s been already said other than to
point out that this type of an ordinance; | am just a small landlord and this is the kind of thing where you
say you are telling me to trust you code enforcement staff and that they will always be well intentioned
and | believe that they are. By the way, | support cleaning up the bad properties because that’s good for
all of us. It’s hard to look at something like this and not feel some anxiety when | know that | might be
facing some of the fines in here, particularly with the ten day notice; that’s not enough time to fix a lot of
problems, particularly the more expensive ones. These might put my kid’s college funds at risk, my
investments. Although | do trust the good intentions of everyone here, | think there really is a lot of
benefit talking with the landlord’s here because they are the ones that are going to know best.

Ms. Cecile Marquis, P.O. Box 3854

Mr. Whitney had written an article in the paper and he was going to be late so he asked if | could pass it
out to all of you. Also, | do understand, Mayor, that your concern with the hotels and the rooming house
and all that and | don’t take that away from you. | know that you do care about the city and the Aldermen
do too. The problem | have with this is that when you are looking at rooming houses and that is a
different; if this ordinance came through it’s supposed to be going against rooming houses is what we
were told. The next thing you know we find out that it’s about regular landlord’s; two-family landlord’s to
100-unit landlord’s and single-family homes too because if their siding is bad on a single-family home this
ordinance says that you have to fix it and if you are poor and you don’t have the money to fix it or you
can't paint it, some of these people don’t have anyone to do this work. | am concerned about that. The
other concern | have is as embarrassing as it was, it happened. We have to move forward and say this
isn’t good and work as a city including the landlord’s — which is the rooming houses. All | am saying is to
the Aldermen and to the Mayor is that this to me is only one sided and it’s not against the tenant. This is
against the whole thing of what is going on here and who is going to hurt the tenant. Some landlord’s
may say forget it, I’m not going to deal with this and sell their building to an out of town landlord and it’s
already happening. Everybody that | here is that the legislators are saying the best thing for Nashua is to
have owner occupied properties but owner occupied properties; especially if they are elderly or low
income, they are going to have issues with fixing things around the building and if you are giving them

Board of Aldermen Page 9
January 10, 2017

MOTION CARRIED

MOTION BY ALDERWOMAN MELIZZI-GOLJA TO RE-REFER O-16-020, AS AMENDED, TO THE
PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AND THE NASHUA CITY PLANNING
BOARD AND THAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 2017,
AT 7:00 PM IN THE ALDERMANIC CHAMBER

MOTION CARRIED

NEW BUSINESS — RESOLUTIONS

MOTION BY ALDERMAN SCHONEMAN THAT THE RULES BE SO FAR SUSPENDED AS TO ALLOW
FOR THE FIRST READING OF A RESOLUTION RECEIVED AFTER THE AGENDA WAS PREPARED
MOTION CARRIED

R-17-085
Endorser: Alderman-at-Large Brian S. McCarthy
Alderman-at-Large Mark S. Cookson
Alderman Richard A. Dowd
Alderman Ken Siegel
Alderwoman Mary Ann Melizzi-Golja
Alderman Sean M. McGuinness
Alderman Don LeBrun
Alderman-at-Large Daniel T. Moriarty
Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien, Sr.
Alderman-at-Large David W. Deane
Alderman David Schoneman
SUPPORTING A BILL IN THE STATE LEGISLATURE TO REDUCE THE COST OF REGISTERING
AIRCRAFT IN NEW HAMPSHIRE
Given its first reading;

MOTION BY ALDERMAN SCHONEMAN THAT THE RULES BE SO FAR SUSPENDED AS TO ALLOW
FOR A SECOND READING OF R-17-085
MOTION CARRIED

Resolution R-17-085 given its second reading

MOTION BY ALDERMAN SCHONEMAN FOR FINAL PASSAGE OF R-17-085
ON THE QUESTION

Alderman Schoneman

We have heard some comment on this tonight. We had a chance to talk with some of the corporate tenants on
the field only to discover that there are some issues that they have with being located in New Hampshire and
some issues that might cause some of those hangars to be empty over there. A few years ago in 2015, the
NH DOT conducted a study on the economic impact of aviation in the State of New Hampshire and it rightly
said that we have great benefit from aviation in this state and not just for pilots and mechanics but for the
companies that own these things and employ people and pay property taxes. A further review of that report
indicates that although the benefit is great, the number of airplanes based and the operations conducted in the
State of New Hampshire is in decline and if the based aircraft and operations conducted in New Hampshire are
in decline then it stands to reason that great benefit is also in decline. In line with what we heard it looks like
the New Hampshire registration fee structure, which at one time may have been competitive, is today non-
competitive particularly with regard to competing with Hanscom Field in Bedford, MA. We heard that an

Board of Aldermen Page 10
January 10, 2017

aircraft that was $40 million could have a $300,000 first year registration fee in New Hampshire and maybe a
$350.00 registration fee in Massachusetts. Massachusetts has a sales tax but anyone who lives near the
border as we do knows that periodically Massachusetts has sales tax holidays. A number of years ago
Massachusetts declared a permanent sales tax holiday on anything to do with airplanes. If someone were to
buy a $50 million jet they would have a $2.5 million tax bill and that would look a lot worse than a $300,000
registration fee but now that they have voided that sales tax and declared a permanent sales tax holiday in
Massachusetts to compete with us, we are now the high cost competitor with registration fees in the vicinity of
$300,000 for the first year. The registration fee calculation charges fees to all aircraft that are based here and
it's a scale. The scale is dictated largely by what we call millage. Millage is in the first ten years of an aircraft's
life there is a value portion that is charged, that’s why it winds up being $300,000 on an expensive airplane. At
the 11" year that same jet might only be $1,000 to register because it falls off of that first ten year schedule. It
would seem to me that registration fee might have been in lieu of a sales tax, ten years of registration fees to
be still competitive with the sales tax that Massachusetts used to have. Massachusetts has seen growth while
our numbers, as reported to the NH DOT study, are trending down. Again, the value that can come from a
company that bases itself here and happens to rely upon corporate travel to conduct their business could be
great. The property tax associated with it, the jobs associated with it and right now the registration fee is a red
flag, it's a stop sign that says don’t come to New Hampshire. Representative LeBrun put together some
legislation, HB-124, which is going to have a public hearing at the Transportation Committee next week and we
are bringing this now under suspension as an endorsement hopefully for the City of Nashua to support some
kind of registration fee reform and to improve the business climate in New Hampshire and especially in
Nashua. The nearest airport of course is Hanscom and they are getting a lot of our business. We are by the
way, Nashua is the busiest airport in the state and Nashua is trending down. In an effort to have a statement
from the city to present at that committee hearing next week, we brought this in and | would be happy to
answer any questions about it. | am sensitive to the desire for there to be some revenue neutrality to it. The
goal of this legislation is that it is not revenue neutral, the goal is that it is overwhelmingly revenue positive and
that’s what drawing new businesses here could do for the state. There are some fee issues and maybe we
can have the state committee take a look at some of the options for restoring some of that revenue lost in the
short-term.

President McCarthy

Alderman Schoneman, do you remember off hand what the total number of aircrafts are registered in the state
is?

Alderman Schoneman
| don’t know but 1,100 sounds familiar to me.
President McCarthy

If | recall correctly, the total revenue from the registration fees statewide is about $850,000?

Alderman Schoneman
Yes, approximately.

President McCarthy

Which works out to about $8,000 per aircraft which means there aren’t very many that are paying $300,000
registering the state, is that correct?

Alderman Schoneman

That is correct. Where Massachusetts may 50 large jets we might have 3 or 4 of the same type. | spoke with
a chief pilot who is based down in Hanscom. He was the chief pilot for EMC which was bought by Dell and

Board of Aldermen Page 11
January 10, 2017

now is a chief pilot for Dell. He says that there are about 275 corporate aircraft based in Hanscom, the ramp is
full and the hangars are full. As soon as someone says they want to build a new hangar he says there are
people lining up dropping money on their desks to say | want to be in your new hangar. Green Mountain
coffee was looking to come to New Hampshire but while they were looking in Portsmouth their accountants
alerted them to the fact that the registration fee would be astronomical and to get that airplane out of New
Hampshire just as quickly as they can. Green Mountain Coffee is now down on Route 3 in Burlington and
wouldn't that have looked nice in Nashua or Portsmouth. It’s about the whole State of New Hampshire.

Alderman Dowd

As the former chair of the Nashua Airport Authority | agree with everything that Alderman Stoneman just said
and the registration fees have been an impediment to bringing aircraft in here for years and | think that
anything we can do to lower the fee will be offset by having more aircraft come into New Hampshire. We are
losing out on a lot of business because of that astronomical registration fee.

Alderman Siegel

| would hope that our representatives that are also Aldermen here would have a bipartisan agreement in the
legislative body for Nashua and this is hopefully not a partisan issue and there is a favorable response from
both sides of the aisle. | will also point out that we don’t have to figure out ways to make up the revenue, the
revenue has already flown away so it isn’t like we have to be revenue neutral. It’s an airplane unlike a fixed
building and it’s typically with those expensive airplanes the come with pilots so you can just sum them from
wherever it is and they are cheaper to have. | strongly urge everyone to support this all through the legislature.

Alderman O’Brien

Fortunately this bill will be appearing before my committee which is the Transportation Committee and as | do
with many things, | make sure | vote for Nashua and this is definitely a bill that would benefit Nashua and | will
urge my colleagues up there to see it as that type of issue, that we are being drained and we have a wonderful
airport that | support and | want to keep it going.

MOTION CARRIED
Resolution R-17-085 declared duly adopted.
NEW BUSINESS — ORDINANCES

O-17-028

Endorser: Mayor Jim Donchess
Alderman Richard A. Dowd
Alderman Ken Siegel
Alderman Sean M. McGuinness
Alderwoman Mary Ann Melizzi-Golja
Alderman Don LeBrun
Alderman-at-Large Daniel T. Moriarty
Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien, Sr.

AUTHORIZING LEFT TURNS ONTO AMHERST STREET FROM CHARRON AVENUE
Given its first reading; assigned to the COMMITTEE ON INFRASTRUCTURE by President McCarthy

Board of Aldermen Page 12
January 10, 2017

O-17-029
Endorser: Alderman-at-Large Brian S. McCarthy
Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien, Sr.
Alderman-at-Large Daniel T. Moriarty
Alderwoman Mary Ann Melizzi-Golja
REGARDING SIDE AND REAR SETBACKS FOR A LOT WITH MULTIPLE PRINCIPAL
BUILDINGS
Given its first reading;

MOTION BY ALDERWOMAN MELIZZI-GOLJA TO ACCEPT THE FIRST READING OF O-17-029, ASSIGN
IT TO THE PLANNING & ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT COMMITTEE AND THE NASHUA CITY PLANNING
BOARD AND THAT THE PUBLIC HEARING BE SCHEDULED FOR TUESDAY, FEBRUARY 7, 2017, AT
7:00 PM IN THE ALDERMANIC CHAMBER

MOTION CARRIED

PERIOD FOR GENERAL PUBLIC COMMENT

Ms. Mary-Elizabeth Carroll, 91 % Chandler Street

I’m here about the environment again. Massachusetts is worse than New Hampshire. | went to my mother’s
house last week and there was glass everywhere and I’m on fire. I’ve had two tests in November and these
doctors don’t believe in God they believe in science. It’s microscopic like dust. Heidi, the Environmental
Health lady, doesn’t believe me and she thinks | am hallucinating. My mother thinks | am lying. | should be
quarantined like the Ebola people. If everyone dies then it’s on Heidi. | shouldn’t have to get other people sick
to prove | am sick.

REMARKS BY THE MEMBERS OF THE BOARD OF ALDERMEN
Alderman Wilshire

| want to thank the fire department and Harbor Homes, the Mayor’s office and anyone involved in the Safe
Stations Program. It’s so well run and | think it’s really working and whatever we can do to support the
program is really incumbent on us, these are our citizens and our neighbors.

Alderman Deane

| would like to send my condolences to the friends and family of Don Mayo who passed away the other day. |
had known him for many years and he was an interesting guy.

Alderman Siegel

I’d like to mention that this Thursday at 7:00 p.m. in the New Searles Elementary School Café | will be hosting
a Ward 9 Informational meeting and all are welcome to attend. | realize that overlaps the Ward 3 meeting that
Mayor Donchess is having. For our legislatures, you probably noticed that there was a 1% report return on our
pension, this is very bad and undoubtedly means that bill to increase the effective expected rate of return to
7.75%, most likely dead on arrival. | would urge our legislatures to please revisit the funding percentage to
introduce legislation, if possible, to make it less than 100% per the discussion that we have had several times.
| just don’t see any real alternatives. We are in a lot of trouble.

Alderman Schoneman

The Mayor is having a Ward 3 meeting on Thursday and would like to invite anyone who would like to come.
It’s at the Amherst Street Elementary School at 7:00 p.m.

Board of Aldermen Page 13
January 10, 2017

Alderman O’Brien

| did attend one of the Mayor’s meetings recently in Ward 1 and it was good to see the people there, it was well
attended. | urge the citizens at home to attend these meetings.

Committee announcements:

Alderman Cookson

The Committee on Infrastructure meets tomorrow evening at 7:00 p.m. in these chambers.

Alderwoman Melizzi-Golja

PEDC meets next Tuesday, January 17" at 7:00 p.m. in the chamber and Director Marchant will be to talk
about the accessory dwelling legislation that has come down from the state and what it might mean to the City
of Nashua.

ADJOURNMENT

MOTION BY ALDERMAN WILSHIRE THAT THE JANUARY 10, 2017 MEETING OF THE BOARD OF
ALDERMEN BE ADJOURNED

MOTION CARRIED

The meeting was declared adjourned at 8:30 p.m.

Attest: Patricia Piecuch, City Clerk

SAFE STATION

A Gateway to Recovery in Nashua, NH

STATISTICS ON THIS DOCUMENT ARE FROM 11/17/2016 — 1/9/2017

Number of Walk-In uests at NFR for Safe:Station: 75
Number-:of Participants Taken:to PSL Facilities: — 65
Number of Participants Taken to a Hospital Emergency Department: 9 Total
. SNHMC: | 5
SJH: | 4
Average Number of Minutes AMR / NFR Companies "Not Available”:
Number of UNIQUE Pa nts to Nashua SafeStation: . 65
Number of REPEAT Participants to Nashua SafeStation: 10
Number of Nashua Participants Seen in Manchester's SS Program: 16
Number of Nashua Participants Seen for an Opioid Overdose PRIOR to SS: | 15
«Number.of Nashua Participants Seen for an Opioid. Overdose SINCE SS: 0
Number of Telephone Inquiries about the P m Received at NFR: 50
e Range of Participants:
Gender Breakdown: —

‘| Station 4 15 Amherst St 26 Station 5 101 Pine Hill Rd
Station 2 177 Lake St 6 Station 6 2 Conant Rd
Station 3 124 Spit Brook Rd | 1 Fire Alarm 38 Lake St
Station 4 70 East Hollis St, | 37

>
oO

Londonde
Lowell, MA
Manchester
Merrimack
Milford

New Boston
Rindge
Woburn, MA

Nashua
Allenstown
Concord

De
Dracut, MA
Greenfield
Haverhill, MA
Hooksett
Hudson
Litchfield

NPR PTR IR lI NR [eR fe

1/9/2017

BDAS Fundi

Personnel Coverage: 24X7=168 hrs X 52 wks = 8,736

r

Taxes 14,077|Taxes 8% of salaries & running rate
Benefits 31,674| Benefits 18% of salaries and running rate

Staff Education and Training 3,500|To provide staff training on crisis intervention and any other

Client Supplies 3,500/To purchase personnel care items for clients.
Food 4,200 mth to food for clients

Occupancy 14,400|$1,200/mth - electric, water, sewer, mortgage etc...

Vehicle Lease 6,000 a month for a lease
Vehicle irs/Maintena 2,500 to cover of veh