Search

Oo mnnows fF wo nw

wo wwn wowwo wwn wv’ WY WY WY WY WHY NY MK NO HBB RB Be Bee Re Ee ee
NY Doom BP wow nwneereoeo DWBaA Det BwWwNnNYNeR CTH WANA Dt fF won KF CO

CHAPTER 215
HB 480-FN - FINAL VERSION
- Page 5 -

incidental intermediate routing of mobile sports wager shall not determine the location or locations
in which such a wager is initiated, received, or otherwise made.

IV. Wager limits for daily, weekly, and monthly amounts consistent with the best practices
in addressing problem gambling.

V. A voluntary self-exclusion program for players to self-exclude themselves from wagering
for set periods of time.

VI. Security mechanisms to ensure the confidentiality of wagering and personal and
financial information except as otherwise authorized by this chapter.

287-1:8 Sports Wagering Supervision. The commission shall create a division of sports wagering
which will be responsible for ensuring compliance with the requirements of this chapter and any
rules promulgated by the commission in accordance with the authorities granted under this chapter.
In addition, the division, under the direction of the director and commission, shall ensure that the
commission's agents and vendors comply with the following obligations:

I. Each agent or vendor engaged in sports wagering shall submit a security and internal
control report for the division's review and approval prior to conducting any sports wagering within
the state and every year thereafter. This report shall address all aspects of security and controls
including physical security, personnel security, and computer systems security including:

(a) Surveillance plans for all retail sports book locations, including surveillance coverage
and direct access for the commission to the surveillance system.

(b) User access controls for sports book personnel.

(c) Segregation of duties within the sports book.

(d) Employment background checks and policies.

(e) Automated and manual risk management procedures.

(f) Procedures for identifying and reporting fraud and suspicious conduct.

(g) Procedures to establish connectivity with monitoring services and/or sports governing
bodies relating to suspicious activity.

(h) Any and all monitoring systems utilized by the agents or vendor to report. and receive
information on suspicious betting activities.

(i) Systems and procedures to prevent prohibited sports bettors from placing wagers.

g) Description of anti-money laundering compliance standards.

(k) Descriptions of all integrated third-party systems or components and the security
procedures relating to those systems.

II. For each wagering computer system used to conduct sports wagering, including all
mobile sports wagering platforms within the state, the agent or vendor providing such system shall
provide a detailed computer system security report to be approved by the commission prior to the
acceptance of wagers and each year thereafter. The report shall address the issues set. forth in the

security and internal control report along with the following:

Oo mnnows fF wo nw

wowwow wow wonwm Ww WM WY WY WY WM MM WNW NH HB HB HBB Be Se ee Re eB
ao vr bP wWwWwnwnr CT TOT WA De fF wo NYRR THO DFDNAN DT FSF Ww NHS KF CO

CHAPTER 215
HB 480-FN - FINAL VERSION
- Page 6 -

(a) Documented system security testing performed by a licensed third-party contractor
approved by the commission;

(b) A description of all software applications that comprise the system;

(c) A procedure for third-party auditing of financial transactions received by the system;

(d) A description of all types of wagers supported by the system;

(e) Unique identification and verification systems for wagers;

(f) Procedures to prevent past posting of wagers;

(g) A list of data recorded relating to each wager;

(h) System redundancy to ensure recording of wagers during a system outage;

(i) A mechanism to provide read only access to the commission to the back office system
for the purposes of reviewing and auditing wagering activities;

) Integration with an independent control system to ensure integrity of system
wagering information;

(k) Capabilities for canceling existing wagers, freezing or suspending wagering across
the platform, or for specific events; and

(1) Any other issue identified by the division upon review of the proposed gaming system.

Ill. Each agent engaged in sports wagering shall submit house rules for the division's review
and approval prior to conducting any sports wagering within the state and every year thereafter.
These house rules shall include at a minimum:

(a) The method for calculation and payment of winning wagers.

(b) The effect of schedule changes for a sports event.

(c) The method of notifying bettors of odds or proposition changes.

(d) Acceptance of wagers at terms other than those posted.

(e) Expiration dates for winning tickets.

(f) Circumstances under which the agent will void a bet.

(g) Treatment of errors, late bets, and related contingencies.

(h) Method of contacting the agents or vendor for questions or complaints.

Gi) Description of those persons who are prohibited from wagering with the agents or
contractor if broader than the prohibited bettors list set forth in this section.

() The method and location for posting and publishing the approved house rules.

IV. Each agent or vendor engaged in sports wagering shall submit accounting controls for
the division's review and approval prior to conducting any sports wagering within the state and
every year thereafter. These accounting controls shall include at a minimum:

(a) A process for documenting and verifying beginning of day cash balance;
(b) Processes for recording collection of wagers, payment of wagers, and cancellation of

wagers issued;

Oo mnnows fF wo nw

wo wwn wowwo wwn wv’ WY WY WY WY WHY NY MK NO HBB RB Be Bee Re Ee ee
NY Doom BP wow nwneereoeo DWBaA Det BwWwNnNYNeR CTH WANA Dt fF won KF CO

CHAPTER 215
HB 480-FN - FINAL VERSION
- Page 7 -

(c) Processes for handling cash within sports book retail locations including segregation
of duties related to counting and storage of cash; and

(d) The establishment of a segregated account related to New Hampshire sports
wagering activities.

V. The commission's agents shall submit a responsible gaming plan for the division's review
and approval prior to conducting any sports wagering within the state and every year thereafter.
This plan should include identification of posting and materials related to problem gaming,
resources to be made available to bettors expressing concerns about problem gaming, house imposed
player limits, and self-exclusion programs.

VI. The commission's agents shall maintain a cash reserve available to pay wagers as
determined by the commission.

VII. The commission's agents or vendor shall not. accept any wager on a sports event unless
it has received approval from the commission to conduct that type or category of wager. A type of
wager refers to the method of determining the outcome of the wager. The category refers to the kind
of event being wagered on. The commission shall approve wager categories and types in a
reasonable time frame. Once a particular category or wager type is approved for its first use it may
be used on multiple events without further approval.

VIII. The commission shall only approve wagers on categories of events where:

(a) The outcome can be verified;

(b) The outcome can be generated by a reliable and independent process; and

(c) The event is conducted in conformity with applicable laws.
IX. Wagers made under this section shall be made with:

(a) Cash;

(b) Cash equivalent;

(c) PayPal;

(d) Debit card;

(e) ACH;

(f) Promotional funds; and

(g) Any other means approved by the executive director.

X. Any agent or contractor who sends or receives electronic sports wagers is responsible to
ensure that any transfer of that wager is initiated and received and completed within the state of
New Hampshire and that only incidental intermediate routing of the wager occurs outside of the
state. The agent and contractor shall be responsible for periodically reviewing their information
technology systems and networks to ensure compliance with this section.

287-1:9 Proceeds to Education Fund. The proceeds received by the commission from sports
wagering, less the administrative costs of the commission, prizes paid, and payments for problem

gambling services, shall be deposited in the education trust fund established in RSA 198:39.

CHAPTER 215
HB 480-FN - FINAL VERSION
- Page 8 -

287-1:10 Limitations on Sports Wagers. The commission and its agents are prohibited from the
following activities:

I. Accepting or making payment relating to sports wagers made by prohibited sports bettors.

II. Accepting sports wagers on prohibited sports events.

III. Accepting sports wagers from persons who are physically outside of the state of New
Hampshire at the time of the sports wager.

287-I:11 Disclosure of Data Source. The commission and agents shall publicly disclose the
source of the data that will be used to determine the outcome of a tier IJ or tier II wager.

287-I:12 Risk Management. The commission's agents may take any risk management strategies
as authorized by the director.

287-1:13 Maintaining Sports Integrity. The commission and agents may participate in national
and international monitoring services and associations and may share betting information with
those entities and sports governing bodies in order to ensure the integrity of sports wagers and
sports events. The director may restrict, limit, or exclude wagering on a sports event if he or she
determines that such an action is necessary to ensure the integrity of the sports book.

287-I:14 Financial Reports. The commission may seek financial and compliance reports from its
agents periodically and may conduct audits of these reports to ensure that the state receives the
agreed upon revenue sharing proceeds.

287-I:15 Compliance Reviews. The commission shall retain oversight of its agents to ensure
that all sports wagering activities are conducted in accordance with this statute and any rules
adopted by the commission.

287-1:16 Fantasy Sports Exempted. Nothing in this chapter shall apply to fantasy sports
contests authorized pursuant to RSA 287-H.

287-I:17 Rulemaking. The commission shall adopt rules, pursuant to RSA 541-A, relative to the
operation, conduct, location, and oversight of sports books. The commission may enact. emergency
rules, which will take effect upon approval.

215:2 Bets Void. Amend RSA 338:2 to read as follows:

338:2 Bets Void. Except as authorized by the lottery commission, all bets and wagers upon
any question where the parties have no interest in the subject except that created by the wager are
void; and either party may recover any property by him or her deposited, paid, or delivered upon
such wager or its loss, and repel any action brought for anything, the right or claim to which grows
out of such bet or wager.

215:3 Education Trust Fund; Sports Betting Added. Amend RSA 198:89, I(k) to read as follows:

(k) Funds collected and paid over to the state treasurer by the lottery commission
pursuant to RSA 284:44, [and] RSA 284:47, and RSA 287-L.

215:4 New Subparagraph; Gambling; Exceptions. Amend RSA 647:2, V by inserting after

subparagraph (e) the following new subparagraph:

Oo mnnows fF wo nw

wo wwn wowwo wwn wv’ WY WY WY WY WHY NY MK NO HBB RB Be Bee Re Ee ee
NY Doom BP wow nwneereoeo DWBaA Det BwWwNnNYNeR CTH WANA Dt fF won KF CO

CHAPTER 215
HB 480-FN - FINAL VERSION
- Page 9 -

() Sports wagering as defined by RSA 287-I:1, XV.

215:5 New Chapter; Council for Responsible Gambling. Amend RSA by inserting after chapter

338-A the following new chapter:
CHAPTER 338-B
COUNCIL FOR RESPONSIBLE GAMBLING

338-B:1 Definitions. In this chapter, "council" means the council for responsible gambling.

338-B:2 Statement of Purpose. Education, prevention, and treatment relating to gambling
disorders are an integral part of a responsible gaming environment within the state.

338-B:3 Establishment. There is established the council for responsible gambling which shall
promote education, prevention, and treatment of problem gambling within the state.

338-B:4 Membership.

I. The council shall consist of 5 members appointed by the governor and executive council
and shall be qualified in the field of addiction or mental health services with a focus on problem
gambling and shall be residents of the state. A member may be removed by the governor and
executive council only for cause shown in accordance with RSA 4:1. The members shall elect one of
their number as chairperson. Three members of the council shall constitute a quorum.

II. Members shall serve 3 year terms and until their successors are appointed; provided that
for the initial appointments only, one member shall be appointed to a term of one year, 2 members
shall be appointed to a term of 2 years and 2 members shall be appointed to a term of 3 years. Any
vacancy shall be filled for the unexpired terms.

III. Members of the council shall receive mileage at the rate of state employees when
attending meetings of the council or performing duties on behalf of the council.

338-B:5 Powers and Duties. The council shall have the authority to enter into grants and
contracts for the purposes of furthering education, prevention, and treatment of problem gambling
within the state.

338-B:6 Report of the Council. The council shall submit a biennial report to the governor and
executive council on or before October 1 of each even-numbered year. The report shall include a
description of the council's activities including a financial report for the relevant time period.

338-B:7 Administrative Attachment. The council shall be administratively attached to the
lottery commission in accordance with RSA 21-G:10. In addition to the support provided to an
administratively attached agency, the lottery commission shall also provide the following to the
council:

I. Funding in an amount not to exceed $250,000 per fiscal year to conduct the activities
prescribed by this chapter. In accordance with the purpose of this chapter, these payments shall be
considered administrative expenses of the lottery commission as set forth in RSA 284:21-j.

II. Meeting and office space as reasonably required by the council to conduct. the activities

prescribed by this chapter.

& wo NO

CHAPTER 215
HB 480-FN - FINAL VERSION
- Page 10 -

III. Personnel as reasonably required by the council to conduct. activities prescribed by this
chapter, except that the lottery commission may charge the council for use of such personnel
pursuant to an agreement between the lottery commission and the council.

215:6 Effective Date. This act shall take effect. upon its passage.

Approved: July 12, 2019
Effective Date: July 12, 2019

DESMAN

Table 3: Existing Regulations Pertaining to Overnight Parking in Communities Studied

City: Nashua Albany Ann Arbor Concord Concord Manchester Mendian Portland Portsmouth Rochester West Hartford

State: AH NY MI NC NH NH Ip ME NH MN cT
1 a '

O.P. Prohibition Yes No! No No No* No* No No”* No No™ Yes

‘ a
OP. Permit Only Yes No? No No No No No ves” No |! No Yes ™
_ i

By RPP Only No Yes" Yes‘ No Yes Yes” No ves |! ves ‘4 Yes” No
7 ™ 5

No OP Regulations No Yes! Yes No No* No® ves No" No? No No

Noles:

1, On-street parking in dawntown Albany is free from $:00 pm te 8-00 am the following day on weekdays and all day on weekends and Solidays

2. Apermitis required to park overnight in Albany Parking Authority off-street fac littes

3. Albany has established several RPPs to regulate parking in residential nexghborhoods in effect from £:00 am te 6.00 pm, weekdays

4, in RPP Zones, there it a 2-hour time limit on vehicles withoul a APP

§. Overnight parking is allowed on most public streets under normal circumstances, but no vehicle can be parked in the same space fet more than 48 consecutive hours.
6. Overnight parking is allowed on most public streets under normal circumstances for private vehicles, bul prohibited for commercial vehicles between midnight and 5:00 AM
7. RPP rones are designated by the Mayor and Board of Alderman.

8, The city has established an "“Odd/Even" palicy between December | and Apri) 15.

9. Portland does not ban overnight parking, but has a lex and ictive set of regul for allowing ight parking on public streets

10. See Nowe #9 above. These restrictions include allowing for over might parking on alternating sides of the street en different districts

11. Portland has 12 defined RPP Zones, all defined by City Council.

12. AS noted previously, Portland has a elaborate set of regulations defining under what conditions overnight parking is allowed

13. Parking in any free areas is limited to 72 hours maximum, Metered areas are enforced from 9am to 3pm, with an escalation rate swuclure aber 3 hours.

14. Portsmouth piloted their Neighborhood Parking Program (NPP}in 2018-2019 and is working an expanding it wilh revisions.

15. Onily very selected areas are subject to no regulation on overnight parking.

16. Rochester has an alternate side of the street regulation in places from October 1 10 May 1 every year between 2am and Jpn.

17. Rochester has 14 distinct Residential Parking Permit areas

18. Under special circumstances, the City will grant very limited overnight parking passes ("Omit Tags") to individuals demonstrating temporary hie.

In addition to Nashua, Portland, Maine and West Hartford both had programs which allowed for overnight
parking on public streets within the framework of a permit. West Hartford’s program offered only
temporary permits for those applicants demonstrating need criteria as well as residency; the permits were
referred to as “Omit Tags” because they instructed patrolling parking officers to ‘omit’ the holder from
sanction as long as the permit was in effect. Applicants for these permits could apply for them virtually
via web portal on the City of West Hartford’s website and qualified recipients did not receive a credential
but had their vehicle license plate added to the City’s “do not cite” fist.

Portland, Maine offered permanent permits for overnight in nine defined zones across the city within an
elaborately structured program. Under this program, and depending on the zone, participants were
required to park on either the odd or even side of the street during certain prescribed hours of particular
days during the month, leaving the other side of the street open for snow removal and street
maintenance. In all but one of the zones, these requirements were in place from October 1 through May
31 each year; in the ninth zone, they were in effect the year round. No vehicle without a permit was
allowed to park overnight in these areas. The requirement to clear certain sides of the street on certain
days was in effect in most zones 11:30 PM or 12:00 AM to 7:00 AM the following day, with the exception
of one area where prohibitions were in effect from 10:00 AM to 2:00 PM on certain days. It should be
noted that these permits did NOT allow holders to park on-street during snow emergencies when all
vehicles were required to clear public roadways.

Seven of the ten communities studied had some form of Residential Parking Permit (RPP) program in
place. While Albany, New York did not have a prohibition to overnight parking on downtown streets, it
has established three different RPP zones in neighborhoods abutting downtown which restrict parking on
the street to RPP holders only from 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM on weekdays. The requirement for permits during
overnight hours and weekends was not in effect for these zones. Ann Arbor, Michigan inversely allows for
overnight parking in downtown streets without a permit, but requires a permit in eight neighborhoods to
park on street at any time. In these zones, non-permit holders may only park up to two hours without
being ticketed.

4. CITY OF NASHUA REPRESENTATIVE The City of Nashua may designate a City of Nashua
representative for this contract. If designated, all notices, project materials, requests by
Professional Engineer, and any other communication about the contract shall be addressed or be
delivered to the City of Nashua Representative.

5. CHANGES TO SCOPE OF WORK The City of Nashua may, at any time, by written order, make
changes to the general scope, character, or cost of this contract and in the services or work to be
performed, either increasing or decreasing the scope, character, or cost of Professional Engineer's
performance under the contract. Professional Engineer shall provide to the City of Nashua within
10 calendar days, a written proposal for accomplishing the change. The proposal for a change
shall provide enough detail, including personnel hours for each sub-task and cost breakdowns of
tasks, for the City of Nashua to be able to adequately analyze the proposal. The City of Nashua
will then determine in writing if Professional Engineer should proceed with any or all of the
proposed change. If the change causes an increase or a decrease in Professional Engineer's cost
or time required for performance of the contract as a whole, an equitable adjustment shall be
made and the contract accordingly modified in writing. Any claim of Professional Engineer for
adjustment under this clause shall be asserted in writing within 30 days of the date the City of
Nashua notified Professional Engineer of the change.

When Professional Engineer seeks changes, Professional Engineer shall, before any work
commences, estimate their effect on the cost of the contract and on its schedule and notify the
City of Nashua in writing of the estimate. The proposal for a change shall provide enough detail,
including personnel hours for each sub-task and cost breakdowns of tasks, for the City of Nashua
to be able to adequately analyze the proposal. The City of Nashua will then determine in writing
if Professional Engineer should proceed with any or all of the proposed change.

Except as provided in this paragraph, Professional Engineer shall implement no change unless the
City of Nashua in writing approves the change. Unless otherwise agreed to in writing, the
provisions of this contract shall apply to all changes. The City of Nashua may provide verbal
approval of a change when the City of Nashua, in its sole discretion, determines that time is
critical or public health and safety are of concern. Any verbal approval shall be confirmed in
writing as soon as practicable. Any change undertaken without prior City of Nashua approval
shall not be compensated and is, at the City of Nashua's election, sufficient reason for contract
termination.

6. CITY OF NASHUA COOPERATION The City of Nashua agrees that its personnel will cooperate
with Professional Engineer in the performance of its work under this contract and that such
personnel will be available to Professional Engineer for consultation at reasonable times and after
being given sufficient advance notice that will prevent conflict with their other responsibilities.
The City of Nashua also agrees to provide Professional Engineer with access to City of Nashua
records in a reasonable time and manner and to schedule items that require action by the Board of
Public Works and Finance Committee in a timely manner. The City of Nashua and Professional
Engineer also agree to attend all meetings called by the City of Nashua or Professional Engineer
to discuss the work under the Contract, and that Professional Engineer may elect to conduct and
record such meetings and shall later distribute prepared minutes of the meeting to the City of
Nashua.

7. DISCOVERY OF CONFLICTS, ERRORS, OMISSIONS, AMBIGUITIES, OR DISCREPANCIES
Professional Engineer warrants that it has examined all contract documents, has brought all
conflicts, errors, discrepancies, and ambiguities to the attention of the City of Nashua in writing,
and has concluded that the City of Nashua's resolution of each matter is satisfactory to
Professional Engineer. All future questions Professional Engineer may have concerning
interpretation or clarification of this contract shall be submitted in writing to the City of Nashua
within 10 calendar days of their arising. The writing shall state clearly and in full detail the basis

GC 3 of 11

DESMA

Concord, Manchester and Portsmouth all have RPP programs in place. Concord’s zones are in residential
neighborhoods abutting the main downtown core and State Capitol complex. Manchester's RPP are in
residential neighborhoods near commercial districts and were established by City Council in collaboration
with Mayor. Portsmouth recently completed a pilot program in one neighborhood and is studying
expansion of the program into adjacent areas.

Of the communities studied, only Meridian, Idaho appears to have no regulations pertaining to the use of
on-street parking at any time. This is curious as Meridian has a higher population density than Nashua and
comparable housing density, median income, and driving share. Conversations with the representatives
from the city’s Police Department and Department of Community Development indicate that competition
for curbside parking in limited by abundant development of off-street parking facilities adjacent to every
land use per local zoning code. However, both officials noted that parking is becoming a constant issue as
Meridian continues to grow and densify and that they anticipate having to institute greater regulation in
the near future to govern use of curbside assets.

As noted previously, Albany and Ann Arbor allow for free overnight parking on downtown streets without
a permit, but both cities also have RPP programs in place for residential districts abutting those
downtowns. In addition, both Albany and Ann Arbor have aggressive metering programs in place for on-
street parking outside their RPP zones during daytime hours to compel turnover. Enforcement of these
regulations in both cities is rigorous and fines are substantial for violations.

DIMENSIONAL CONSIDERSATIONS

Any manner of on-street parking, regardless of regulations and rules, can only exist if there is adequate
space along the roadway to allow for parking and safe passage of traffic. As a general rule, parking spaces
are between 8’ and 9’ in width and travel fanes are between 10’ and 11’ in width, so for a one-way street
with parallel parking along just one side, a minimum roadway with of 18’ to 20’ is required. Changing the
angle of the parking stalls, adding additional lanes of travel, and/or adding parking along both sides of the
roadway will further increase the dimensional requirements for roadway width.

The structure of the roadway along its length also will impact how many vehicles might be parked along
a particular length. As a general rule, there must be at least 20’ of contiguous, uninterrupted space along
the curb to accommodate one parallel parking space. Both the minimum width of a paralle! parking space
and its length are determined by the typical vehicle width and tength, plus allowances for lateral
clearances to open the vehicle’s door without interrupting flaw along the adjacent travel lane on the
driver’s side, reasonable clearances between the vehicle and the curb on the passenger side, and
clearances to allow for the movement of vehicles in and out of each space. Studies of U.S. vehicle sales
over the last two decades have shown that the majority of all vehicles on the road across the country are
6.5’ wide by 17.5’ long or smaller. These dimensions represent the 85" percentile vehicle size of all
vehicles in operation within the United States which is consistent with a large SUV such as a Ford
Expedition or Chevrolet Suburban.

The linear run of contiguous, uninterrupted space along the curb will define how many vehicles may be
parked along that block face. At block face with 100’ of uninterrupted, contiguous curb can conceptually
park up to five vehictes based on a standard of 8’ x 20’ per space. In actual practice, the block face may
only suppert more or less vehicles depending on the size of each vehicle and the skill of each driver. In
urban centers where parking spaces are not individually delineated, vehicle sizes are smaller than the 85"

DESMAN

percentile, and drivers are practiced at parallel parking, it possible that up to seven cars might be parked
in the same 100’. Inversely, four large vehicles parked carelessly with several feet of separation between
each could fill the same 100’ block face, even though there is enough linear distance to support five
spaces.

Any interruption in the curb will further reduce the practical parking capacity of a length of roadway. Using
the example of the 100’ curb face, if there is a driveway of 10’ in width in the middle of the block, that
would reduce the 100’ of uninterrupted space into two segments of 45’ in length each, reducing the
practical capacity to just four vehicles at an assumed set aside of 20’ per space. The addition of second
driveway on the same block could easily reduce practical capacity to just three vehicles, even if it is only
10’ in width, because it would further reduce the total number of uninterrupted 20’ lengths of open curb
space along the block face.

Other factors which impact the amount of uninterrupted, contiguous space along a curb face include
minimum setbacks from various structures. Some of these setbacks are prescribed to preserve the
efficient flow of traffic within the community, including emergency and service vehicles. As a general rule,
most communities mandate no vehicle may park within a certain distance of an intersections to
accommodate the wider turning movements of long wheelbase vehicles such as fire engines, ambulances,
snow plows, and garbage trucks. Other setbacks, such as prescribed ‘no parking’ areas adjacent to fire
hydrants, exist to assure quick and easy access to resources during emergencies.

Other setbacks such as required ‘no parking’ areas to either side of a curb cut for a driveway or alley exist
to preserve site lines for drivers so they can see oncoming traffic along the roadway from a safe vantage
point within the driveway or alleyway. Without these setbacks, individuals could park right up to the edge
of the curb cut, requiring drivers attempting exit the driveway or alleyway to pull into the roadway to see
if oncoming traffic is present before pulling out.

DESMAN reviewed the code of ordinances and zoning code for Nashua as well as the ten comparable
communities for required setbacks from crosswalks; stop signs or traffic signals; driveways; alleyways;
intersections without crosswalks, stop signs, or traffic signals; fire hydrants; and other structures.
DESMAN also collected information, where available, on dimension standard for parallel parking space,
travel lanes in roadways, and other pertinent regulations pertaining to parking on public streets. Where
there were no clear regulations regarding these items, DESMAN noted this category as “n/a”. A summary
of this research is shown in Table 3.

Table 3: Dimensional Standards for On-Street Parking

City: Nashua Albany Ann Arbor Concord Concord Manchester Meridian Portland Portsmouth Rochester West Harttord
State: NH ay Mi NC NH NH 8) ME NH MN ct
Setback from Crosswalk nfa 20° 20° 20 20° aw 2° 20 nja 20" 25°
Setback from Sign/Signal 2s 39 30 50° a0 30, x” x nfa cy nfa
Setback from Oriveway z ‘ nfa 4 nfa s 5 nfa a nja 3 nfa
Setback from Alley nfa nja 4 nfja nfa * nfa ‘ aja nfa nfa 5 nfa
Setback from Intersection r 2s * nfa Ly aga 2 2 ‘ nfa 25° 20° 2 re
Setback from Fire Hydrant 15° 1s iy is' iy y bh 19° ka 1 17
Setback from Other Various * 20-75 *o2o-7s' 7 zot7s) * az ae sae! * fa 2-75 ona
Parking Stall Dimensions 9x23" ex2s * otxz0 * gste23 * otx22 * axons? * otxax * on 22 sx2 * B7SK20 || KD
Orive Aisle Width afa woo oar Soa Fa aayzot Yo azyast * azyze yz 10y2t 12/20
Other Regulations nf ix onda wz onfa nfa aja ofa * nia ze3a' n/a

As the table shows, there are currently regulations in Nashua dictating setbacks from signs and signals,
driveways, intersections, and fire hydrants. Article XIl of the Nashua Cade of Ordinances also carries
multiple sections (320-61, 320-62, 320-64, 320-69, 320-70) which dictate where parking may or may not