Search

Graham, Donna

From: gene porter <gporter77@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 9:58 AM

To: Board of Aldermen

Ce: Klee, Patricia; Donchess, James
Subject: Mandatory Masking

CAUTION: This email came from outside of the organization. Do not click links/open attachments if source is
unknown,

Please support the Mayor's efforts to require that all people in
confined public indoor spaces wear masks.

Some few will make the specious argument that such a mandate
would unduly infringe on their freedom. But so do many rules of
public behavior, including such disparate topics as speed limits,
building codes, traffic signals, seat belts for children and
prohibitions on hunting deer with bazookas.

The mask issue is not like the motorcycle helmet issue. Helmets
almost exclusively protect the riders, who in NH are free to
take the risks. Masks primarily protect others, and

their mandate is a very legitimate and important way for the
government to protect the public health.

The opponents of the Mayor's mask edict seem very confident that the
benefits of avoiding masks in terms of personal liberty and economic well
being outweigh its costs and drawbacks. But since they seem to
downplay or even ignore the drawbacks of mask avoidance it is
hard to avoid feeling that their argument is more an expression
of ideological imperatives than of reasoned and evidence-based

1

analysis. Masks are avoided in Sweden and the Covid 19 death
rate there is over five times higher than in neighboring
countries where masking is de rigueur.

Gene Porter

Graham, Donna

ee GEE ESE ET OR EE EE AP a ae EEE a re
From: Amanda Blair <akathrynblair@gmail.com>

Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 10:06 AM

To: Board of Aldermen

Subject: Support of Mask Ordinance

CAUTION: This email came from outside of the organization. Do not click links/open attachments if source is unknown.

Good morning,

lam a Nashua resident and would like to extend my support of the proposed ordinance to require the use of face masks.
| am young and healthy but | live with my mother who is immunocompromised. | feel we all have a responsibility to
protect everyone in our community. This needs to be a joint effort and | feel that the only way to get more people on
board is to make the use of masks mandatory.

| also work at gateways community services where | serve as a case manager for many elderly Nashua residents. In
‘speaking with my clients many are afraid to leave their homes or have caregivers come into their homes because the

general public is not taking the proper precautions to keep them safe.

| admit that when this all started | felt very silly wearing a mask. However, as | saw more and more people using them |
felt more comfortable. If everyone is wearing masks then no ane has to feel silly or self-conscious.

It is my hope that this ordinance is passed in order to safeguard our community. Many of us feel powerless in facing this
virus but wearing a mask is a simple act that we can all participate in.

Thank you for your time and consideration,

Amanda Blair
2 Birchwood Dr, Nashua

Graham, Donna

ae CE ence aaa al
From: Paul & Rita Harrington <sunkingint@gmail.com>

Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 17:31 AM

To: Board of Aldermen

Subject: Masks

CAUTION: This email came from outside of the organization. Do not click links/open attachments if source is
unknown.

To the Board of Alderman

While I understand some citizens would like to have mandatory masks I am not in favor of this at all. I have
worn one for 3 weeks when I went into any stores and

I ended up getting very dizzy and did not feel well from it. Also it is a issue of freedom of choice and | am all
for that I don't want to be fined or jailed because I did not wear a mask. Let it be up to the store owners weather
they want masks and people can choose if they want to enter these businesses. Not the government telling me |
have to wear it. Also people can stay 6 feet from others or stay home if they feel that scared.

Sincerely,
Rita Costanzi
Ward 3

Graham, Donna

From: Jeff Carter Gilson <jeffgilson@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 11:55 AM

To: Board of Aldermen

Subject: Mask Ordinance

CAUTION: This email came from outside of the organization. Do not click links/open attachments if source is
unknown.

As a Nashua resident (and someone with co-morbidities for COVID-19) I urge you to please keep Nashua safer
and support the mandatory mask rule proposed by the Mayor. While masks aren't 100% effective, they are more
effective than not having masks, and in concert with social distancing can help greatly in reducing the spread.
Personal freedom ends when it comes to endangering others, so requiring masks in public spaces is not a
violation of people's rights.

Thanks

Jeff Gilson
Ward 3

HARLEY —- DAVIDSON

ELECTRA GLIDE

« Mechanical Adjustable Actuation Clutch

« Limited 3 year, 60,000 mile factory warranty
-Police Duty Use only
-Fully Transferable

-Expires at 3 years or 60,000 miles,
whichever comes first

MODEL UNIQUE FEATURES
« RDRS Rider Safety Enhancements
- Cornering Enhanced ABS (C-ABS)

- Cornering Enhanced Electronic Linked
Braking (C-EL8)

- Cornering Enhanced Traction Control System
(C-TCS)

- Drag-Torque Slip Control System (DSCS)

- Vehicle Hold Control (VHC)

- Tire Pressure Monitoring System (TPMS)

» Handlebar with bar ends turned higher to provide
more clearance to the operator's iegs

« Fareassisted oil cooler

« Batwing fairing

« Floating, dual-front open brake rotors

« Heated hand grips with adjustable six-setting
heat control

« 2-1-2 exhaust with dual tapered mufflers

« Dual law enforcement blue license plate marker
lamps (OEM standard)

» Pivoting footboards with heel/toe shift lever
e Daymaker® LED headlight

Reflex” Linked Brembo® Brakes with ABS

* 4-piston front and rear caliper

* Trigger switch activation allows approx, 15 minutes
of power to police emergency equipment with
ignition off

« Independent hazard warning switch

« Emergency light switch with 4 functions and
individual indicator lights for: OH, Both Front and
Rear On, Front On only, Rear On only

« Saddlebags with One-Touch latch, standard
saddlebag guard and luggage locks, common
with ignition key

Model shawn with optional emergency equipment.

DIMENSIONS
Length 94.7 in. (2405 mm)
Overall Width 37.8%. (960 mm)
Overall Height S7.11In, (1450 mim)
Seat Height Laden? 27.3 In. (695 mm)
Uniladen 31.7 In. (205 mm)
Ground Clearance 5.3 in. 135mm)
Rake (Steering Head) 26¢
Fork Angle 29.25°
jal 6.7 in. {170 mm)
Wheelbase 64 in. (1625 mm)
Fuel Capacity 6 gal, (22.7 L)
{warning light at approximately 1 gal}
Weight
* As Shipped 809 Ib. (367 kg)
«in Running Order 844 ib. (383 kg)

« Gross Vehicle Weight Rating $1360 Ib. (617 kg)

« Gross Axle Weight Rating
+ Front $00 tb. (227 ke)
- Rear 927 th. (420 kg)
ENGINE
Engine Mitwaukee-Eight* 114 Engine
Valves Pushrod-operated, overhead

valves with hydraulic, self-adjusting
lifters; four valves per cylinder

Bore x Stroke 4.016 in. x 4.5 it.
(102 mn x 114 mrn}

Displacement $44 cu. In. (1868 cc)

Compression Ratia 10.531

PERFORMANCE

Engine Torque® per s1249):

*NorthAmerica 123 ft. tb. @ 3000 RPM
(167 Nm @ 3060 RPM)

Lean Angle gper W168 :

Right 32°

«Left 32°

Fuel Economy* — 43

{EPA estimate = combined MPG} (5.5 L100 km)

CHASSIS

Frame Mild steel; tubular frame; two-piece
stamped and welded backbone; cast

and forged junctions; twin downtubes;

bolt-on rear frame with forged fender

supports; MIG welded.

Swingarm Mild steel, two-piece drawn and

welded section, forged junctions,

MIG welded

Front Fork 49 mm Dual Bending Valve

Rear Shocks Premium standard height

hand-adjustable rear suspension

Wheels Impeller Cast Aluminum

® Front 17 in. x3 ln. (432 mm x 76 mm)

« Rear 16 In. x Sin. (406 mm x 127 mm)
Brakes

*Caliper Type 32 mm, 4-piston front and rear

« Rotor Type (qiameter x width):
- Front (dual floating rotors} 1.8 in. x O2iIn.
(300 mm x 5.1 mm)

+ Rear (fixed rotor} 11,8 in. x 0.28 in.

(300 mm x 7.1 mm}

* Anti-lock Braking System Standard
Suspension Travel

« Front Wheel 4.6 In. (117 mm)

» Rear Wheel 3 in. (76 mm)

1 North America security system includes immobilizer;
outside North America, the security system includes
immobihzer and siren.

2 Measurement reflects 180 Ib. (81.7 kg) operator
weight.

3 Values shown are nominal.

4 The combined fuel economy numbers were derived
using a combination of estimated city and highway
values. Fuel economy estimates are derived fram US
EPA exhaust emission certification data on a sample
motorcycle from the corresponding family under

ideal laboratory conditions. Your actual fuel economy
will vary depending on your personal riding habits,
road and driving conditions, vehicle condition and
maintenance, tire pressure, vehicle configuration (parts
and ace ies), and vehicle loading {cargo, rider and
passenger weight). Break-in mileage may vary.

Viet H:D.cam/Police for additional specifications and
available calor options.

Graham, Donna

From: Lyn Danforth <lunicorn7@msn.com>
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 2:35 PM
To: Board of Aldermen

CAUTION: This email came from outside of the organization. Do not click links/open attachments if
source is unknown.

Dear Board of Alderman,

Hello Board of Alderman!
I am a concerned citizen of Nashua, NH.

Thank you for all your hard work you have done through the life altering situation, Covid-19.
Could you please make it mandatory to wear a face mask in public buildings.
This will help prevent the spread of Covid-19. People without masks, could be not sick, but be carriers

of the Covid-19.

We could place those signs on the highway that we use for storms. To let everyone coming into the
state that they will need to wear a face mask in our town.

My Mom and J are concerned with all the out of state people coming up here, and going into the
stores and other public places.

My Mom is going through chemo, and her and I are doing our best, as not to get sick.
Thank you for reading our concerns,

Evelyn Danforth
30 Salem St, Nashua, NH

Violet Vesey (Mom)
6 Pelham St, Nashua NH

Graham, Donna

ieee eae CECA STMT ee
From: Laura Wuorinen <laurajwuorinen@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, May 15, 2020 4:29 PM
To: Board of Aldermen
Subject: Face masks

CAUTION: This email came from outside of the organization. Do not click links/open attachments if source is
unknown.

To the Honorable Alderman of Nashua NH,

Please consider not only the constitutional rights of patrons in Nashua, but also the conflicting evidence on the
efficacy of face masks. There is a mountain of evidence indicating that not only are face masks completely
ineffective against the transmission of viruses, but are also harmful as they cause the wearer to re-inhale the
wastes the body is trying to rid itself of by exhaling in the first place.

They also create a false sense of security for high-risk individuals who would be better self-quarentining than
walking out amongst the general public.

This is not a question for legislation but but a question for individual judgement and choice.

Respectfully,
Laura J. Wuorinen

Graham, Donna

From: Ralph Kelloway <RAFEO317@hotmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 11:30 AM

To: Board of Aldermen

Ce: Klee, Patricia

Subject: Masks

CAUTION: This email came from outside of the organization. Do not click links/open attachments if source is
unknown.

Asa former firefighter for the City }am more then aware of all safety guidelines that need to be addressed when it
comes to certain things.

This being said, despite with what the vocal minority is saying about the closing of local business and blaming the BOA
for this,| happen to think the Governor is doing a damn good job compared to others around the country and it has
nothing to do with political parties either and it is not the BOA, so they need to do some research maybe.

| also think that the face mask thing is just another issue that is being blown out of proportion,

i happen to wear a mask when entering a store and have no issues with it. | think if you can’t breathe with one on maybe
you need to stay home then.

| will continue to do so and | myself don’t need to be mandated to do so.

| hope the Board does not force the issue as | feel it is up to store owners to regulate this. lf a mask needs to be worn in
a store per owner and people do not like it ~SHOP ELSWHERE.

| don’t think it is up to our elected officials to play Nanny. The Government is involved in enough of our lives now as it is,
lam not anti VAX or MASK but fee! the person should be able to choose and forcing the issue causes more issues.
Please vote down the forced mask wearing/ fine thing as it will only cause more issues that are not needed to be piled
on to the people who already are stressed enough with this . The enforcement of this will only back log the PD with a
tiny matter such as this.

It is simple -#1- Wear a mask. #2 — lf store requires one and shopper doesn’t like it , shop elsewhere. They complain
about store closing yet threaten to go shop somewhere else(Another town).

| again am a mask wearer and will continue for my benefit and my family.

It might not help as the “experts” say whoever they are but I will take the chance of not spreading virus and possibly
keeping that 1 droplet coming out of their mouths when complaining from entering mine.

Thanks in advance
Ralph Kelloway
11 Standford Rd
Ward 3

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

Graham, Donna

SEAIEE Ee AEA EI A EE aE TENT wine al
From: Beth Scaer <bscaer@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, May 16, 2020 11:52 AM
To: Board of Aldermen
Ce: NashuaNews@unionleader.com; Nashua Telegraph News
Subject: _ Nashua restaurants are suffering

CAUTION: This email came from outside of the organization. Do not click links/open attachments if source is
unknown.

Dear Aldermen,

NH restaurants are being allowed to start serving customers at outdoor tables starting this coming Monday, May
18. Manchester has already passed an ordinance to allow restaurants to expand seating in parking areas and
sidewalks in front of adjacent businesses during the shutdown. Restaurants can submit a site plan and
Manchester is striving for a 24-hour turnaround time to approve plans. Meanwhile, at your most recent meeting,
I heard that an ordinance for expanded outdoor restaurant seating hasn’t been written and won’t be available for
a vote until a future meeting. How long after that until the restaurants get their plans approved? I thought one of
the major goals of the board was to make a vibrant downtown. In this situation, how many restaurants will be
left in the city? We have already lost Country Tavern. How many more restaurants owners are out of time and
out of money and giving up?

Beth Scaer
111 E Hobart St, Nashua