Board Of Aldermen

From: James B. and Mary E. Cutter
86 Palm St., P.O. Box 69-Nashua, NH 03061 Ph. 889-4246
Date: June 14, 2016
To: Alderman-At-Large Brian S. McCarthy, President
Ce: Jim Donchess, Mayor, Steve Bolton, Corporaion Counsel,
Thomas Lopez, Alderman, Ward 4.
Subject: 1949 Plat Plan error at 88 Palm Street.

Dear Alderman McCarthy,

You have heard me talk many times about the City error that gave a

large part of our driveway/clothesline area to
We would like it very much if the

But, as far as I know,

Lovering, Susan

From: Bob <rhkkeating@yahoo.com>

Sent: Monday, June 13, 2016 10:26 PM

To: Lovering, Susan

Subject: in support of 0-16-003 Adm. Enf. Ordinance

To the Nashua Board of Aldermen,

The Telegraph

It's your Community.

Founded 1832
Editorial Board ¢ Jim Konig, publisher
Roger Carroll, editor

Kathleen MacFarline, evening news editor

594-6467 | fax: 882-2681 | letters@nashuatelegraph.com | The Telegraph, 17 Executive Drive, Hudson, NH 03051

Trump and Clinton
are not in same boat

From: Siegel, Ken [mailto:SiegelK@nashuanh.gov]

Sent: Friday, June 10, 2016 7:50 PM

To: Peter Nicosia <Nicosia@Nicosia-Associates.com>; Lovering, Susan <LoveringS@nashuanh.gov>

Good morning Aldermen & Mayor Donchess,

CONCLUSION

In light of the foregoing, the Petitioners respectfully request that the proposed Ordinance
be rejected in its current form by the Board of Aldermen.

Respessa submiyha,
7 IONERS BY THEIR COUNSEL,

violation such a time frame is patently unreasonable. There needs to be an
Administrative Appeal mechanism that allows a property owner to provide
evidence to justify expansion of the time frame to comply on a case-by-case basis.
One size does not fit all here. What if the job is complex? A contractor is
unavailable? A property owner is out of state/communication? A natural disaster
occurred? There are insurance or tenant issues? The way the proposed ordinance
is written does not comport with a fair analysis of what reality is likely to be here.

ARGUMENTS

1. The City of Nashua already has a mechanism for enforcement of building, fire
and health code violations pursuant to RSA 502-A:11-a and RSA 676:6.
Inclusive in those statutory protections is the ability to also fine non-compliant
property owners. As such, the proposed ordinance is duplicative. Moreover, the
adoption of the ordinance will not eliminate the need for a future District Court
proceeding if a property owner wants to contest the violation.

Standard of Review

LAW OFFICE OF

NICOSIA & ASSOCIATES, P.C.

259 MIDDLESEX ROAD
PETER J. NICOSIA (MA, NH & ME) P. O. BOX 721 TELEPHONE: (978) 649-4300
TYNGSBORO, MASSACHUSETTS 01879 FACSIMILE: (978) 649-9308

LAWRENCE M. BEANE (MA) . .
W www.nicosia-assoclates.com TOLL FREE: (866) 2!5-9248

COURTNEY JOHN BALL (MA & NH)

MEMORANDUM IN OPPOSITION TO
PROPOSED NASHUA ORDINANCE O-16-003, CHAPTER 74
(Board of Aldermen Meeting June 14, 2016)