Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 6/13/2022 - P20
Special Board of Aldermen 6-13-2022 Page 20
Special Board of Aldermen 6-13-2022 Page 20
Special Board of Aldermen 6-13-2022 Page 19
look brand new and they are functioning perfectly well but they’re 20 years old. The high school before that didn’t
even last 15. So you have to spend your money wisely and having that constraint on it that was opposed didn’t do the
City any favors and it didn’t do any taxpayers any favors either.
Alderman Cathey
Thank you Madam Chairwoman. | just noticed that there was no public comment tonight. Can | motion for public
comment before we adjourn?
President Wilshire
You can.
Special Board of Aldermen 6-13-2022 Page 18
left under the cap. In my tenure here, the exclusions were looked at more of an override. So there was kind of a
challenge to not want override and not want to exclude. So that’s what | lived with from ‘13 to ‘17 and then the
spending cap was deemed unenforceable by the courts. Thank you.
Alderman Lopez
Special Board of Aldermen 6-13-2022 Page 17
It was a citizens’ initiative that put this on the ballot, yes.
Alderman Klee
So the wording of it is how the citizens put it there not how it was necessarily worked appropriately and so on. | just
wanted to kind of get that — | thought that was the case but | didn’t want to make that statement without...
Steve Bolton, Corporation Counsel
Special Board of Aldermen 6-13-2022 Page 16
It was a hypothetical question just to try to make it easy because we’ve been dancing around this a lot about what to
exclude, what not to exclude.
Steve Bolton, Corporation Counsel
Well then | don’t understand your question. (inaudible) you don’t have the authority to do it.
Alderman Sullivan
Special Board of Aldermen 6-13-2022 Page 15
You're welcome. Alderman Cathey?
Alderman Cathey
Special Board of Aldermen 6-13-2022 Page 14
be even though we don’t have an override provision, there seems to be quite a bit of room there if we voted to exclude
principle and interest on bonds and capital expenditures. There seems to be quite a cushion there to me.
Special Board of Aldermen 6-13-2022 Page 13
correctly, the number on your calculation on line item 14 if I’m reading this correctly, 14 total appropriations. That's
based upon the Charter provision of 56C which says total expenditures. Is that correct?
John Griffin, CFO/Treasurer/Tax Collector
Madam President - John Griffin, CFO/Treasurer/Tax Collector. That’s correct.
Alderman Jette
Special Board of Aldermen 6-13-2022 Page 12
So just to clarify that, there is nothing constitutionally in the NH State Constitution that they based their decision on. It
was purely Statutory?
Steve Bolton, Corporation Counsel
Yes.
Alderman Clemons
Special Board of Aldermen 6-13-2022 Page 11
The good news is eventually it gets paid back because if you don’t spend it, it’s there. It doesn’t just go to the general
fund. It has to be either transferred to another capital project which the Aldermen find necessary to do or it gets paid
back to retire the payments on those bonds - retire that debt or a portion of it. So it’s not a waste and assuming
there’s no theft or misappropriation involved, it effectively lowers to the extent it’s not needed and never spent it
lowers taxes in the future.