Skip to main content

Main navigation

  • Documents
  • Search

User account menu

  • Log in
Home
Nashua City Data

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Finance Committee - Minutes - 8/2/2017 - P1

Finance Committee - Minutes - 8/2/2017 - P1

By dnadmin on Mon, 11/07/2022 - 10:21
Document Date
Wed, 08/02/2017 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Finance Committee
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Wed, 08/02/2017 - 00:00
Page Number
1
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/fin_m__080220…

REPORT OF THE FINANCE COMMITTEE
AUGUST 2, 2017

A meeting of the Finance Committee was held on Wednesday, August 2, 2017, at 7:00 p.m. in the Aldermanic
Chamber.

Mayor Jim Donchess, Chairman, presided.

Members of the Committee present: Alderman-at-Large Mark S. Cookson, Vice Chair
Alderman-at-Large Lori Wilshire
Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien
Alderman June M. Caron

Members not in Attendance: Alderman Benjamin M. Clemons
Alderman Ken Siegel

Also in Attendance: Corporation Counsel Steve Bolton
Dan Kooken, Purchasing Manager
Assistant Fire Chief Brian Rhodes, Asst. Fire Chief, NFR
Bill Mansfield, Radio Systems Coordinator

PUBLIC COMMENT - None
COMMUNICATIONS

From: Steven A. Bolton, Corporation Counsel
Re: Agreement with Patrick Engineering, Inc.

MOTION BY ALDERMAN O’BRIEN TO ACCEPT, PLACE ON FILE AND AUTHORIZE THE CITY TO ENTER
INTO THE LETTER AGREEMENT WITH PATRICK ENGINEERING, INC.

ON THE QUESTION

Attorney Bolton

This relates to the ongoing litigation with ED Swett, Inc. and the city. It concerns the construction of the bridge
as part of the Broad Street Parkway project. Mr. Dye and Mr. El-Beik were at that time employees of the
design engineer that we had on the project part Sprinklerhoff. They are both fact witnesses and expert
witnesses in terms of how the piers were supposed to be constructed, the difficulties encountered by the
contractor during construction, and as you know, the litigation dispute is about a $2 million level of change one
way or the other. We basically need to retain these gentlemen who now work for Patrick Engineering to assist
us in the litigation and provide testimony about what they observe what their knowledge of the standard
practice. We intend to depose them and utilize their expertise in the litigation.

Not entirely unheard of but a little bit different in these situations is the indemnity provision where we’re going
to indemnify Patrick Engineering. The reason for that is that Patrick Engineering was not involved at all in the
design or construction in this project. They just happened to be the current employer of the two professionals
that we're interested in. That’s the extent of it.

Alderman Cookson

Who is Wadleigh, Starr, and Peter selected as a firm to represent Patrick Engineering?

Page Image
Finance Committee - Minutes - 8/2/2017 - P1

Footer menu

  • Contact