Board of Aldermen 03-12-2019 Page 18
Could you refer the motion because there was another subsequent motion made by parliamentary inquiry
we are voting on the motion that | originally made, correct?
President Wilshire
No we are voting on the motion to re-refer.
Alderman O’Brien
So the motion to re-refer has the higher priority motion? Ok.
President Wilshire
The motion is to re-refer Resolution R-18-073 as amended back to the Personnel and Administrative Affairs
Committee? Further discussion on that motion?
Alderman Klee
Just one more comment and this is again to Attorney Bolton in reference to Alderman Lopez's comment. If
we hear this on April 1° would that be a public hearing at that time or is that just a discussion and then
whatever comes out of that, then it goes to a public hearing? | just want to make sure that we get a little
timeline I’m a little concerned about the June date.
Attorney Bolton
Where you are now, you are simply sending it back to Committee, you are not scheduling another public
hearing.
Alderman Klee
If it gets changed as perhaps was discussed, then it would be best to have a public hearing correct?
Attorney Bolton
Yes
Alderman Klee
And then that would take so much time and then we would vote on it on the same day like we are doing it
today? Is that the way it would work?
Attorney Bolton
If that’s the will of the Board, sure.
Alderman Klee
| just want to make sure that we are meeting the time line.
Attorney Bolton
We'll know that as things progress | guess. It is certainly possible that you can still meet the timeline.
