2s should be made to the Plan to accommodate projects that have failed or are not considered feasible after an evaluation and revie
ansistency with the benefit cost analysis, STAPLEE analysis, timeframe, community’s priorities, and funding resources. Mitigation
ties that were not ranked as priorities during the 2018 update should be reviewed as well during the monitoring, evaluation, and upi
Plan to determine the feasibility of future implementation. New mitigation actions or plans proposed upon adoption of this Plan sh
the benefit cost and STAPLEE analysis methods utilized in this Plan to ensure consistency with the adopted Plan and to help the Resi
3 Initiative stakeholders evaluate overall potential for success.
tion to Resilient Nashua Initiative quarterly meetings, these stakeholders will meet after any hazard occurrence as part of the City’s
fing exercise. The Hazard Mitigation Plan will be updated following this meeting to reflect changes in priorities and mitigation strat:
ive resulted fram the hazard event. It is especially important to incorporate updates within one year after a Presidential Disaster
ation.
‘y of Nashua will utilize its website, official posted meeting notices, local cable channels, and existing social media outlets, including
10k and Twitter to notify members of the public about the Resilient Nashua Initiative meetings and to involve them in the update pri
iblic input that is received will be incorporated into the Plan update. All Resilient Nashua initiative agendas, meeting minutes, and s!
ttee minutes are available to the public to aid with their continued involvement in the update process. Furthermore, public meetin;
ly held prior to implementing mitigation projects or when addressing specific issues related to hazard mitigation. For example, a ser
meetings were held regarding the Jackson Mills Dam, Crest Gate Flood Mitigation Project. Meetings and associated outreach are
sted by the department responsible for the project.
