Skip to main content

Main navigation

  • Documents
  • Search

User account menu

  • Log in
Home
Nashua City Data

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Finance Committee - Minutes - 6/1/2016 - P4

Finance Committee - Minutes - 6/1/2016 - P4

By dnadmin on Mon, 11/07/2022 - 09:53
Document Date
Wed, 06/01/2016 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Finance Committee
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Wed, 06/01/2016 - 00:00
Page Number
4
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/fin_m__060120…

Finance Committee Page 4
June 1, 2016

MOTION CARRIED

From: Dan Kooken, Purchasing Manager

Re: Contract Award for Single Stream Recycling (Value: Not-to-Exceed $249,925)

MOTION BY ALDERMAN SIEGEL TO ACCEPT, PLACE ON FILE AND, CONTINGENT UPON APPROVAL
OF THE FY17 BUDGET, AWARD THE CONTRACT TO CASELLA RECYCLING, LLC, IN AN AMOUNT
NOT-TO-EXCEED $249,925. SOURCE OF FUNDING IS DEPARTMENT 168, SOLID WASTE; 55, OTHER
CONTRACTED SERVICES

ON THE QUESTION

Alderman Clemons

So the motion is contingent upon the budget passing?

Mayor Donchess

| suppose that is correct, yes.

Alderman Clemons

When does the contract that we have now expire?

Mayor Donchess

At the end of the fiscal year.

Alderman Clemons

So what happens if for some reason the budget doesn’t pass until after the 1° of July?

Mayor Donchess

That’s a good question. | think to operate the city we would have to pass that continuing resolution which, not
during my tenure on the Board of Aldermen but | think has happened. A continuing resolution being basically
that we continue to operate kind of at the same level. | really would need to ask; | mean we could store the
recycling for a while but | don’t know if there would be money under a continuing level funding situation to
execute the contract. How that would work | would really need to investigate with Director Fauteux.

Alderman Clemons

My only other question to that is why is it contingent upon the budget for next year? Was it something that
wasn’t thought of and put into the budget last year?

Mayor Donchess

| think I’ve revised my answer to say | don’t know if it is contingent but | need to talk to them about how they
would do this in the context of a continuing resolution but in previous years | don’t think there was a payment
because the value of recycling was much greater so there was no requirement of a payout. This year the
conditions are much worse so it’s going to cost under this proposal $249,000 per year to dispose of the
recycling. In the enterprise fund; this is technically an enterprise fund but it doesn’t support itself because

Page Image
Finance Committee - Minutes - 6/1/2016 - P4

Footer menu

  • Contact