Finance Committee Page 21
August 3, 2016
MOTION BY ALDERMAN SIEGEL TO TABLE PENDING ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION
MOTION FAILED
Vice Chairman Cookson
We won’t wait for additional information, but we would certainly appreciate it being made available to us, those
that are interested.
Alderman Caron
That is what | was going to say. | think having that information for future reference, because obviously there
will be other vehicles that will be coming up, will help us down the line.
Vice Chairman Cookson
We will go back to the original motion which is to accept, place on file and authorize the purchase from MHQ in
the amount of $25,080.
MOTION CARRIED
Ms. Peek
If | could just add a little bit more. It has made me nervous hiring somebody potentially without a vehicle. Our
lab director lives within walking distance. Sometimes he has walked to work. | think it would serve the city well
to look into some of those policies a little bit better. | know other departments just automatically get a stipend
for mileage. We don’t do that type of thing. We are depending upon our cars. We now have four people who
are primarily field people using three vehicles. There will be a reduction in mileage, but | was always a little
worried if | hired somebody without a vehicle. What were we going to do with them and how are we going to
handle that.
MOTION BY ALDERMAN SIEGEL TO TAKE FROM THE TABLE O-16-015
MOTION CARRIED
O-16-015
Endorsers: Alderman-at-Large Lori Wilshire
Alderman Richard A. Dowd
Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien, Sr.
PROVIDING FOR CONFIDENTIAL REDACTIONS ON THE RECORD OF EXPENDITURES
e Tabled — 7/20/16
MOTION BY ALDERMAN SIEGEL TO AMEND O-16-015 IN ITS ENTIRETY BY REPLACING IT WITH
THE PROPOSED AMENDMENT PLACED ON OUR DESKS THIS EVENING
MOTION CARRIED
MOTION BY ALDERMAN SIEGEL TO RECOMMEND FINAL PASSAGE AS AMENDED
ON THE QUESTION
Alderman Siegel
Before you are the changes. There’s one line that got changed. Part B, Item 3. Section B got changed to
remove all generality in the way we can redact information from the Record of Expenditures. It’s only wage
garnishments; workers’ compensation payments and payments where disclosure could endanger or
compromise police department personnel. Redactions in this situation may be overridden by a vote of the
