Skip to main content

Main navigation

  • Documents
  • Search

User account menu

  • Log in
Home
Nashua City Data

Breadcrumb

  1. Home
  2. Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 1/2/2020 - P7

Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 1/2/2020 - P7

By dnadmin on Sun, 11/06/2022 - 23:17
Document Date
Thu, 01/02/2020 - 00:00
Meeting Description
Board Of Aldermen
Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Date
Thu, 01/02/2020 - 00:00
Page Number
7
Image URL
https://nashuameetingsstorage.blob.core.windows.net/nm-docs-pages/boa_m__010220…

Board of Aldermen 1-02-2020 Page 7
Steve Bolton, Corporation Counsel

Back on the table is the wrong expression, it would be more proper to say “back on the floor” or “back
before the Board of Aldermen for its consideration”. Tabled is where things are put pending further action
at another time. So there was just a misuse of the phrase, but essentially the explanation was correct.

Alderman Jette

Ok thank you.

President Wilshire

Anyone else? The motion is to reconsider Resolution 18-102 amended by roll call.
A viva voce roll call was taken which resulted as follows:

Yea: Ald. O’Brien, Ald. Gidge, Ald. Harriott-Gathright, Ald. Dowd
Ald. Klee, Ald. Laws, Ald. Lopez, Ald. Caron, Ald. Kelly,
Ald. Melizzi-Golja, Ald. Tencza, Ald. Schmidt, Ald. Clemons
Ald. Wilshire 14

Nay: Ald. Jette 1
MOTION CARRIED

R-18-102, Amended
Endorsers: Alderman-at-Large Lori Wilshire
Alderman-at-Large Michael B. O’Brien, Sr.
Alderman Richard A. Dowd
Alderman-at-Large Brandon Michael Laws
Alderman Jan Schmidt
Alderman Linda Harriott-Gathright
Alderman Mary Ann Melizzi-Golja
APPROVING THE COST ITEMS OF A COLLECTIVE BARGAINING AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE
NASHUA BOARD OF POLICE COMMISSIONERS AND UFPO LOCAL 645 PROFESSIONAL
EMPLOYEES OF THE NASHUA POLICE DEPARTMENT FROM JULY 1, 2018 THROUGH JUNE 30,
2022 AND AUTHORIZING RELATED TRANSFERS
e Mayor Vetoed — 12/30/19

MOTION BY ALDERMAN CLEMONS TO OVERRIDE THE MAYOR’S VETO OF R-18-102, AMENDED,
BY ROLL CALL

ON THE QUESTION
Alderman Jette

| voted in favor of this the last time we voted, the time before that | voted against it. And! voted against it
because at that time the contract provided for allowing employees who were hired after September 16,
2003 to have unlimited sick leave. If you may allow me to explain, my understanding is that prior to that,
back in 2003 as the Mayor had explained, the City was trying to reduce the amount of sick leave that
employees could cash out upon retirement or death. On other issues | think | have explained to you my
feeling about sick leave is that it is designed to allow employees to take time off when they are sick and to
be continued to be paid so that they and their families do not suffer financially because of their illness and |
fully support that.

Page Image
Board Of Aldermen - Minutes - 1/2/2020 - P7

Footer menu

  • Contact