| explained on social media, that | had watched Lynn Cameron deal with some pretty difficult people (they
were men) who came into the assessing office upset about exemptions. They were verbally and aggressively
confronting her. She was accosted by them. She stood up to questioning beautifully and was no shrinking
violet.
The information from the police investigation has not been made public yet. | am still waiting for my RTK
request to be filled. It has been 8 months since the warning was issued and | have no idea what was said by
every employee to warrant the warning given to me.
Have the Aidermen and Jan Schmidt been made privy to the information in that investigation and should she
be posting the results on social media when the person accused does not have access to the information and
no real means to defend themselves?
So, when Jan Schmidt writes employees were accosted, in tears and frightened. Who is she referring to?
This is not the first time that Alderwoman Schmidt has used social media to address the police warning.
| was sent a post this weekend by a Nashua resident who was on Jan’s personal Facebook page. Here is what
was written,
“Lam trying to have a conversation with a woman who has inflated her self-importance by attacking a
city department.
You know that person who has an argument by increasing the load of horseshite by bringing up every
single slight she has ever encountered?
Even if each has been resolved, years ago?
And then her friends jump in to tell you that you are shite and have to be removed from office?
Yes, Have a problem with letting people get away with manipulating the facts and manipulating
people —/ don’t know why | bother.”
She the writes on her page, “I have to say that 99% of my own constituency is incredible. Thoughtful,
caring, part of a community- but there’s those few — one called me a Schmidthead today...sigh.”
It is not clear, if Aldermen Schmidt is referring to me in this post. But what is clear is that it is incredibly
inappropriate to write this way about any citizen who chose to reach out to Jan.
If this post is, in fact, about me, then Jan is doing quite a bit of information manipulation herself. She writes
that each of the issues has been resolved years ago. My issues have not been resolved. My appeal and
abatement will continue for the next several years, my Right-To-Know lawsuit is scheduled for a 2 day trial in
November, and my police investigation data has not been released. We still do not have a Chief of Assessing
and no policies have yet to be written to guide the office. The by-laws for the Board of Assessor were started
last September and are not publicly available. Public input has been eliminated. Moving forward to replace
paper data with digital data has not even been locked at.
